pikid89
Member
Mods, I realize this isn't the competition area, but since it discusses the idea of getting new people into the games, i put it in general discussions
with the popularity and awesome level of fun in games like IDPA, IPSC, USPSA etc...
AND
the constant (correct) advice of how everyone should have a 22 of some sort for its huge fun/cost ratio
i start to wonder, why havnt these 2 thing been combined
I realize there is the USPSA Steel Challenge, but thats not the same
I think that shooting an IPSC competition with a Ruger MKII/ Buckmark/ S&W M-63 and a red dot would be a riot, and pretty cheap to boot
A lot of people have a gun like that and it would be much easier for people with just a 22, or poor college students (like me ) to shoot more competitions
I decided to do a little googling and i came across another shooting forum (forum name withheld) where they were discussing just this conundrum. I figured there would be resounding support for the fun, the cost savings, and the ease of introducing newbies into action shooting.
but that wasn't the case
the general consensus was totally negative, some almost even snobbish towards rimfire
Why such hostility??
I agree that rimfire isn't what IDPA (defensive pistol) is about and that makes sense, but why can't we have something along the lines of that or IPSC or USPSA...I could even see that taking off into its own sport as ammo and components and guns get more and more expensive
What say you fellow HighRoaders: You guys that shoot one of the games, would you be accepting of a rimfire division in your game, or even a dedicated rimfire organization?
Or you guys that don't shoot, why not, are ammo and the special guns to cost prohibitive; would you play if you could run your favorite 22?
with the popularity and awesome level of fun in games like IDPA, IPSC, USPSA etc...
AND
the constant (correct) advice of how everyone should have a 22 of some sort for its huge fun/cost ratio
i start to wonder, why havnt these 2 thing been combined
I realize there is the USPSA Steel Challenge, but thats not the same
I think that shooting an IPSC competition with a Ruger MKII/ Buckmark/ S&W M-63 and a red dot would be a riot, and pretty cheap to boot
A lot of people have a gun like that and it would be much easier for people with just a 22, or poor college students (like me ) to shoot more competitions
I decided to do a little googling and i came across another shooting forum (forum name withheld) where they were discussing just this conundrum. I figured there would be resounding support for the fun, the cost savings, and the ease of introducing newbies into action shooting.
but that wasn't the case
the general consensus was totally negative, some almost even snobbish towards rimfire
This should NEVER be made an official division of USPSA. SteveJ is right, a .22 is not a suitable caliber for 'Practical" pistol shooting
Just so it's in writing....USPSA can simply cancel my membership the moment that a 22LR division is legalized in USPSA.
It's time for people to get a clue. USPSA just went and bought the Steel Challenge, which is a sport that essentiallly does NOT recognize power and is eminently suited for new/inexperienced shooters. Shoot your 22 there. At the USPSA match, everybody needs to pull up his/her big people pants and shoot ammo that makes PF.
Why such hostility??
I agree that rimfire isn't what IDPA (defensive pistol) is about and that makes sense, but why can't we have something along the lines of that or IPSC or USPSA...I could even see that taking off into its own sport as ammo and components and guns get more and more expensive
What say you fellow HighRoaders: You guys that shoot one of the games, would you be accepting of a rimfire division in your game, or even a dedicated rimfire organization?
Or you guys that don't shoot, why not, are ammo and the special guns to cost prohibitive; would you play if you could run your favorite 22?
Last edited: