OP
OP
troy fairweather
Member
Ya that sounds right, I think they made a few changes before the transition year.
Price check on fn mauser
- Thread starter troy fairweather
- Start date
- Status
OP
OP
troy fairweather
Member
FN “Commercial” Action/Rifle Production Changes I cannot speak directly to the various FN military mauser products. In respect of FN sporting rifle and component action production, perhaps the following information may be useful in answering the original question posed.
First two areas of concurrence with prior posts. I agree fully that prewar FN actions designated for sporting purposes appear mechanically and structurally identical to their military counterparts. I also agree that the basic quality of all FN actions appear the same regardless how employed. Final finish even within sporting actions often differed based upon the various sporting manufacturers that employed them in rifle building. Second, although I have no metallurgy expertise I would be quite surprised if the steel utilized was not the same for both military and sporting actions. In respect of barrels, I suspect that the use of chrome vanadium steel in FN barrels were exclusive to their sporting rifle. I assume FN military mauser products used good quality carbon steel as it seems unlikely that CV steel would have been required by military clients.
The following are highlights of FN commercial post WWII action production changes as they increasingly departed in features from their military brethren. .
1. Introduction in 1946 of a sporting model action. Principal modification of the military action limited to bolt handle redesign. This introduced the sweeping low scope bolt configuration that would become a signature element of the commercial line.
2. Approximately1948, significant modifications consisting of: elimination of the ‘thumb cut’ to facilitate a strengthened solid left receiver wall, elimination of elevated receiver bridge and clip loading recess, low scope safety more often incorporated on models designated for the U.S. market. “Chrome Vanadium Steel” barrel markings routinely appeared.
3. Approximately 1950, engineering modification of the so-called ‘full C’ inner receiver ring. The inner ring against which the barrel abuts was altered from a single cut necessary to accommodate the long mauser extractor, to include a second non functional cut. The modification was made for production simplification. Technically the receiver strength was slightly compromised. The practical effect was nil. It is my belief that this change was all FN mauser action production, sporting and military.
4. Early nineteen fifties: A transitioning period during which receivers were routinely tapped for telescopic sight mounts and corresponding low scope safeties always supplied. The FN logo atop the receiver ring was slowly phased out.
5. Mid nineteen fifties. Introduction of the FN Mauser “Supreme” action which incorporated a redesigned cocking piece housing and side safety lever. Their standard FN mauser action continued also to be offered for some years as a less expensive alternative..
This constituted the principal market wide course of FN mauser product development of their long extractor mauser action. One caveat in interpreting production changes. The ‘newest’ of these rifles are now fortyish years old. Manufacturer component substitutions, special orders, repairs and customizations may be erroneously misinterpreted as standard product-wide production features.
Throughout production, these FN mauser military and commercial actions stood second to none in their markets.
First two areas of concurrence with prior posts. I agree fully that prewar FN actions designated for sporting purposes appear mechanically and structurally identical to their military counterparts. I also agree that the basic quality of all FN actions appear the same regardless how employed. Final finish even within sporting actions often differed based upon the various sporting manufacturers that employed them in rifle building. Second, although I have no metallurgy expertise I would be quite surprised if the steel utilized was not the same for both military and sporting actions. In respect of barrels, I suspect that the use of chrome vanadium steel in FN barrels were exclusive to their sporting rifle. I assume FN military mauser products used good quality carbon steel as it seems unlikely that CV steel would have been required by military clients.
The following are highlights of FN commercial post WWII action production changes as they increasingly departed in features from their military brethren. .
1. Introduction in 1946 of a sporting model action. Principal modification of the military action limited to bolt handle redesign. This introduced the sweeping low scope bolt configuration that would become a signature element of the commercial line.
2. Approximately1948, significant modifications consisting of: elimination of the ‘thumb cut’ to facilitate a strengthened solid left receiver wall, elimination of elevated receiver bridge and clip loading recess, low scope safety more often incorporated on models designated for the U.S. market. “Chrome Vanadium Steel” barrel markings routinely appeared.
3. Approximately 1950, engineering modification of the so-called ‘full C’ inner receiver ring. The inner ring against which the barrel abuts was altered from a single cut necessary to accommodate the long mauser extractor, to include a second non functional cut. The modification was made for production simplification. Technically the receiver strength was slightly compromised. The practical effect was nil. It is my belief that this change was all FN mauser action production, sporting and military.
4. Early nineteen fifties: A transitioning period during which receivers were routinely tapped for telescopic sight mounts and corresponding low scope safeties always supplied. The FN logo atop the receiver ring was slowly phased out.
5. Mid nineteen fifties. Introduction of the FN Mauser “Supreme” action which incorporated a redesigned cocking piece housing and side safety lever. Their standard FN mauser action continued also to be offered for some years as a less expensive alternative..
This constituted the principal market wide course of FN mauser product development of their long extractor mauser action. One caveat in interpreting production changes. The ‘newest’ of these rifles are now fortyish years old. Manufacturer component substitutions, special orders, repairs and customizations may be erroneously misinterpreted as standard product-wide production features.
Throughout production, these FN mauser military and commercial actions stood second to none in their markets.
- Status
