Quality of Remington 7400

Status
Not open for further replies.

147 Grain

Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2005
Messages
178
Just curious as to your opinion on the quality of Remington's 7400 semi-auto rifle - particularly in 30-06?

Does the action function reliably or jam once in a while / all the time? Any extra maintenance issues?

....And is the accuracy suffient up to 300 yards? Other good / bad points about this rifle?

Thanks in advance of your reply!
 
Rem 7400

You asked! May not be what you wanted to hear but..............
I've fired three different Remis and two different BARs and was not impressed with either. I know many folks who hunt with them and swear that there is nothing better. The best I could get out of them was 3.5 MOA. At 300 yards that's a 10.5" group which to me is not acceptable hunting accuracy.The only good I have to say about them is that they never missed a beat-0 jams!
 
:barf:

And every other attempt Remington made in a semiauto.

The pump actions are pretty bad too.
 
NMshooter, I beg to differ with you concerning the 7600 pump. I have one
with syn stock and the thing is a 1MOA rifle. (30-06). On the 7600's the
fore-arm and magazine tube are completly separate from the bbl. The bbl is
totally free-floated from the receiver out. That is why everyone that I have
seen are great shooters. The older 76's and 760's were connected at the end
of the slide/mag tube to the bbl. Mine is the 18" bbl carbine. My Father has
the longer 22" bbl and his is also a 1MOA shooter.
 
Bunch of folks here have them, especially the older models. IME, most are solid 2.5 MOA rifles. The big key seems to be getting a solid (non-see through) scope mount and decent glass. Couple of smiths here (one a Remington warrenty center) have told me that the semi's have a finite life. Sooner or later, some important part breaks that just totals out the rifle. :(

The pumps, OTOH, seem very good. I've shot a couple that were capable of giving most bolt guns a real run for their money.

Both the pump and semi have poor triggers and you can't get them as crisp as a good bolt action.
 
I have an old 742 woodsmaster in 06. It would probable shoot 2 moa. I rarely pulls a hunting shot of over 200 yards. Plenty accurate for that. I still prefer my bolt guns.
 
Hey 147,

If you are interested in one, there is a pawn shop here in Southeast Texas that has EIGHT of them on the used rack. One .280 (740), one .308 (742), and six .30-06s (two 7400s, one model 4, and the rest looked like 742s).

IME, as far as the pumps go, the 760s will shoot tighter than the 76/7600s, and all of them will shoot close to MOA with a load the rifle likes. I have seen quite a few of them in police cars, because they have the same controls as an 870.

Just my .02,
LeonCarr
 
I've shot some that are good, and some that aren't. Some will approach MOA and some are 3-4 MOA guns IME. Typical Remington toss-up for quality it seems.
 
And really most eastern whitetail hunters will never notice the difference! I rarely shot deer at over 100 yards as a kid because the pine forests of Alabama and Georgia (and yes every the areas of hard woods ) are so dense that you'd rarely see a deer beyong that.

The guns mags have everone convinced that if they aren't shooting 4 inch groups at 400 yards that there is something wrong with themor their rifle. Shooting at that distance is a hairy mixture of a lot of differnt factors.

Each year I see lots of tripod antelope, deer and elk because lots of riflemen forget to learn how to estimate range. Long distance shooting skills in hunting are a poor substitute for learning the fieldcraft necessary to sneak on an animal and harvest it within an ethical range limit.

I hear of 1000 yard elk shots each year. I think anyone who has read a ballistics table would recognize these for the silly boasting that they are.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top