Range report: CZ85 and M&P9

Status
Not open for further replies.

Quoheleth

Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2007
Messages
3,195
Location
The Land of Bowie, Crockett, Travis & Houston
Mondays are my day off, so I loaded the car this morning with 300 rounds of 9mm (125gr Missouri Bullet LRN (Smallball) over 4.0gr Universal) and my CZ 85 and my M&P9. The CZ is relatively new to me; the M&P has been with me almost 2 years. It was a beautiful morning in SE Texas - temp around 90-92, slight breeze, and bright & sunny.

I decided to use the CZ first. The mag easily accepted a full load of 15 rounds and inserted crisply into the belly of the pistol. Slide cycled smoothly by hand as I loaded the first round into the chamber. Decided to forgo the DA shooting and see what I could do with the first shot, SA. At 10 yards, shooting at the July rimfire target (I had some in the range bag, never getting to the range in July), I put the first couple rounds in the 3x4 target square. The next two mags full proceeded to punch a golf-ball sized hole in the center of that 3x4 square. It shoots like a bloody laser - put the front sight where I want it to shoot, and BINGO, that she blows! There were some dirt clods at the 50 yard berm. I could engage those without difficulty as well. Maybe not every shot was a hit, but it was close! Recoil is very managable in this all-steel gun. Trigger is smooth. After a few mags I got a good feel for the trigger: it has a bit of creep and with careful focus, I can notice the slack being taken up just before the seer breaks. I had a few flyers around the target while experimenting and focusing extra-hard on the trigger break and less on the precise sighting alignment. Nevertheless, this is a new range favorite. Whether it makes it into carry rotation remains to be seen due to its weight. However, it's excellent shootability puts it into contention. A hundred rounds through this gun was a pleasure (I ran about 50, shot the M&P, then came back to the CZ at the end).

With the CZ getting warm, I set it aside for the M&P to take a turn. I have been trying to shoot this gun well for 2 years. It consistantly shoots low for me and it is only with EXTREME focus on front sight and SLOW trigger squeeze that i can get it to hit CLOSE to where I aim. Yes, I qualified for my Texas CHL with this weapon, but at 3 yards, that's not difficult. And, truth be told, the further I backed up (last 10 shots were at 15 yards) the lower I hit. I've been told that I anticipate recoil with this gun and I'm pushing the gun, thus lowering my POI from my intended POA. OK...I was determined to shoot cleanly, no anticipation, tight focus and good trigger discipline. Like the little engine that could, I thought I could do it.

I was horribly disappointed. I cannot get this gun to shoot POA-POI worth a darn. At 10 yards, I was shooting 6" low (nice fist-size group, by the way...just low!). I was focusing so hard that my eye hurt - I had to close my right eye (I'm a southpaw) and really zero in on the front sight. (I am not flinching -- at least, not that I can discern. I was there by myself, so i could not get a 2nd opinion to watch for flinch.) Per the Hogdon data, this load should be @1000-1050fps, slower than factory stuff, so I thought the low POI might be due to a slower velocity. I had a box of factory 115 gr Monarch - tried it. It maybe pulled up a little bit, but not much - still shooting 4" low.

I don't think it's the gun. A friend shot it and shot it remarkably well. Made me jealous...

Is it possible that the M&P and I are just not compatible? Perhaps I need to do an eHarmony listing and see if we can work this out or if we need to part company.

The CZ says "I like you." The M&P apparantly doesn't care for my toothpaste, deoderant, or aftershave. Anyone else have a logical reason as to why I can't shoot the one but the other is just fine? As of right now I am frustrated with the Smith and am strongly considering selling/tradint it - after all, if it doesn't shoot where I want it to shoot, it's not doing me much good, is it?

Q
 
Sounds like the front sights need adjusted, do it yourself or send it back to smith and wesson.
 
(I am not flinching -- at least, not that I can discern. I was there by myself, so i could not get a 2nd opinion to watch for flinch.)

To determine if you are flinching or not, try interspersing some A-Zoom snap caps (they are all metal and usually will function the same as live rounds in terms of feeding) with some live rounds in your magazine. The random loading will betray a flinch when the firing pin strikes the snap cap and nothing moves except your hand.
 
+1 Swampwolf: on the snapcaps, the cheap nylon work for this too. They just dont last as long.

Put some in and juggle your mags while not looking. It can be an eye opener..:)
 
Can a fellow have a pistol he just can't shoot well?

Very much so. And if your friend shot it just fine then it seems like you found the one that doesn't fit you. You could try the snap cap trick but for it to work well you really need to have a buddy load your mags with a snap cap or two in random order so you're not expecting the dreaded "click" and he should be watching you to see if you flinch.

It's an odd thing but lower power reloads don't shoot low. They tend to shoot higher. It's because the gun begins to recoil at the point of ignition and the slower round spends more time in the barrel as the muzzle is rising so it comes out the end when the gun is higher.

I shoot "Revovler Roullete" with my .357 wheelguns quite often. 5 rounds of .38Spl and one of .357 Mag. The mag round consistenty hits the target about 2 to 2.5 inches low at 15 yards compared to the little 2.5 to 3 inch group of the other 5. This happened often enough that I asked a old time target shooter about it and he told me why.

The other way to test if it's you or not is to shoot the M&P from a pistol rest.

In the end there's worse things in the world than not being a plastic pistol sort of guy.... :D
 
I've had several guns that I just did not shoot well no matter what I did. I just sell them and move on. Life is too short to worry about it.

I have found that in 9mm, I shoot CZs better than any other pistol. So now I have a bunch of CZs. :D

Best regards.
 
Tightening your grip as you pull the trigger can also result in low hits.

Swampwolf is right on the mark re: mixing snap caps randomly in your magazine and seeing how you react when you get to them as you go through the magazine. It's really telling on any faults you have when you are firing.
 
Can a fellow have a pistol he just can't shoot well?

Absolutely. I generally prefer guns that have a slim grip profile, but my best shooter is a Sig P226ST with a grip as wide as a brick. I have also owned a Beretta 92FS and I couldn't shoot it worth a darn, even though my son could eat the center out of a target with it.
 
Have you tried a different grip back insert?

Have you tried covering the target with the white front sight dot instead of using a six o'clock hold?
 
Had a few I just couldn't shoot well, most notably an Astra A-100 in .45 ACP everyone else could shoot straught, and I couldn't.
So, I do like Craig, own a few CZ pistols instead! :)
 
Thanks, all.

re: snap-caps, I'll either buy some or make some (punch the dead primer out, fill the primer-hole with hot glue or latex caulk, then seat & crimp a bullet to correct OAL) and see if it makes a difference.

I've tried all three backstraps. I settled on the largest b/c of the palmswell.

What gets me is with the CZ I literally shot out the center of the target. Even with double-taps I was still covering a CD-sized area around the bull. With the M&P, even with the 12:00 hold, I was way low.

I'm going to try it one more time in the next week. If I can't get this thing reined in, I'll put it up WTT here.

Q
 
Q,

We sound a lot alike. I "had" 2 M&P's, great guns. A .45 with manual safety and a 9L, the longer slide 9mm. Same thing happened to me. I could shoot the M&P's well, but I was down right deadly with a CZ.

I tried and tried to "love" the M&P's, but for me, the CZ was like a siren in the night. I finally gave up on the M&P's after about a year. I sold both.

I have tried hard not to become one of those brand loyalist snobs (still not a snob), but I am now, most definitely a brand loyalist.

I now have 6 CZ's.

(Great wtite up, I really enjoyed reading it!!)
 
Of all the pistols that I've owned over the years, I shoot CZs the best.

In my case: CZimply The Best ..applies to very well

In concern to the M&P. My wife's Compact shot very nice.

I could get good hits with it, but it didn't point as well..
or should I say, it wasn't ergonomically erotic for me, like
CZs are.

We both shoot the new PCR more accurately than the M&P.
Pcrkev3.jpg

I always say that there is a CZ out there for everyone.

Looks like you have found yours!

KEV

Gunstuffs09-1.jpg
 
M&P or CZ-75

Mastering the striker trigger on the M&P is a problem. Strikers do not have the smooth pull of a hammer gun,like the CZ. After much practice I can shoot the M&P very well. Took lots of time and rounds down the tube to get there though!:D
 
Re Striker-fired pistols

Does the Springfield XD have a smoother trigger than the M&P? I know it's classified as a SA trigger.

I'm quite honestly looking for another option besides the M&P at this point. This is not a flame against the M&P - I think they are great guns. Just, not a great gun for me.

Q
 
Last edited:
The only XD I'm familiar with is a Subcompact .40 my son has, it's pretty smooth, but I don't think any striker gun is anywhere as smooth as a traditional hammer gun. I picked up a CZ-75 in a store a few weeks ago and no striker gun is as smooth as the typical hammer style gun on the single action pull ,at least in my opinion. I guess I have just learned to shoot the M&P through lots of practice and dry fireing.
 
It was a beautiful morning in SE Texas - temp around 90-92

First off,^^^^^^^^That don't make sense:D Thats a terrible day in Michigan:neener:

I never found a person that didn't like shooting my CZ75, and didn't shoot it well.
I can't shoot any Keltec product very good. They shoot low for me, and I hate the triggers. So, yeah, some guns just don't fit your hand, and shoot poorly.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top