WelshShooter
Member
- Joined
- Jun 10, 2014
- Messages
- 491
Hi folks,
There's been a good thread recently on developing a good load by @Nature Boy and thought I'd add some further knowledge via my Lee Enfield No.4 Mk1. Whilst the method described by Nature Boy looks at changes in bullet velocity between powder charges and shifts in point of impact, I only focused on precision and vertical shifts between powder charges. Note: I cannot measure velocity using a MagnetoSpeed using this rifle due to the full length wood work.
This rifle is factory standard but the rear battle sight has been replaced with a Parker Hale PH5C rear aperture sight. This sight has a fine micrometer adjustment for windage and elevation and also features an adjustable size rear aperture hole. For load development, I tend to shoot this rifle from a bench, using a front and rear bag at a distance of 100m to ensure that the rifle is in a stable platform. I do not use the sling. See picture below from Saturday 15th June 2019.
Back in November of last year, I developed a great load using fired PPU/Privi brass, 180gr S&B bullets, Vihtavuori N140 powder and CCI 200 primers. The brass had the shoulders bumped back 0.002" (measured using a shoulder bump gauge) and trimmed to 2.212". The charge of 39.7gr produced a very precise group which also gave the same point of impact as my zero load.
I've recently bought 500 brand new PPU cases, and this is where I made a major learning point and hence the purpose of this thread. The Lee Enfield is known for having a very generous chamber to ensure reliable feeding when shooting in dirty conditions as you'd expect during wartime. This is of no benefit to the reloader. I measured the new brass from case-head to shoulder datum using my shoulder bump gauge and found that this measurement is 0.040" shorter compared with my shoulder bumped, fire formed brass! Therefore, it is highly likely that my previously developed load of 39.7gr N140 is not going to shoot well in this rifle as there will be a change in pressure when shooting. This may result in a shift in the point of impact and/or precision.
I sized the brass using my full length die, which made no difference to the shoulder bump length, but it did straighten out case mouths which had dinged during transit but at least they're all uniform now. I decided to back off the powder charge to 38.5gr and work my way back up to 39.7gr in 0.3gr increments. I then shot a string of 5 shots of each powder charge, then repeat the same test using another 5 shots of each powder charge. The reason behind this is that I always have a feeling in the back of my head that my group size tends to open up at higher charges due to fatigue.
Both cycles confirmed that 38.5gr of N140 produced a good, precise group and that my idea of shooters fatigue is not an issue. However, using new brass required +3 clicks in elevation from zero to achieve the same point of impact as per the fired brass test. During the first cycle, I did decide to move the final group (39.7gr) up by +6 clicks as I was struggling to see my bullet impacts. In hindsight, I should not have changed this if I wished to see a shift in vertical, but in the end this was confirmed with my second string. The second string of shooting showed that all groups had the same point of impact, with no major shift in the vertical direction. This was a bit strange for me as my first test on fired brass showed vertical shifts whereas using new brass I did not see any vertical shifts.
In conclusion, I have learned that with the Lee Enfield there is a significant difference between using fire formed brass and brand new brass, especially if you have a generous chamber. I've now got a good load which can be used with the remaining 450 new brass cases and after these have been used, I can continue using my previously developed load. Back to the reloading bench I guess!
1st Round of New Brass
2nd Round of New Brass
There's been a good thread recently on developing a good load by @Nature Boy and thought I'd add some further knowledge via my Lee Enfield No.4 Mk1. Whilst the method described by Nature Boy looks at changes in bullet velocity between powder charges and shifts in point of impact, I only focused on precision and vertical shifts between powder charges. Note: I cannot measure velocity using a MagnetoSpeed using this rifle due to the full length wood work.
This rifle is factory standard but the rear battle sight has been replaced with a Parker Hale PH5C rear aperture sight. This sight has a fine micrometer adjustment for windage and elevation and also features an adjustable size rear aperture hole. For load development, I tend to shoot this rifle from a bench, using a front and rear bag at a distance of 100m to ensure that the rifle is in a stable platform. I do not use the sling. See picture below from Saturday 15th June 2019.
Back in November of last year, I developed a great load using fired PPU/Privi brass, 180gr S&B bullets, Vihtavuori N140 powder and CCI 200 primers. The brass had the shoulders bumped back 0.002" (measured using a shoulder bump gauge) and trimmed to 2.212". The charge of 39.7gr produced a very precise group which also gave the same point of impact as my zero load.
I've recently bought 500 brand new PPU cases, and this is where I made a major learning point and hence the purpose of this thread. The Lee Enfield is known for having a very generous chamber to ensure reliable feeding when shooting in dirty conditions as you'd expect during wartime. This is of no benefit to the reloader. I measured the new brass from case-head to shoulder datum using my shoulder bump gauge and found that this measurement is 0.040" shorter compared with my shoulder bumped, fire formed brass! Therefore, it is highly likely that my previously developed load of 39.7gr N140 is not going to shoot well in this rifle as there will be a change in pressure when shooting. This may result in a shift in the point of impact and/or precision.
I sized the brass using my full length die, which made no difference to the shoulder bump length, but it did straighten out case mouths which had dinged during transit but at least they're all uniform now. I decided to back off the powder charge to 38.5gr and work my way back up to 39.7gr in 0.3gr increments. I then shot a string of 5 shots of each powder charge, then repeat the same test using another 5 shots of each powder charge. The reason behind this is that I always have a feeling in the back of my head that my group size tends to open up at higher charges due to fatigue.
Both cycles confirmed that 38.5gr of N140 produced a good, precise group and that my idea of shooters fatigue is not an issue. However, using new brass required +3 clicks in elevation from zero to achieve the same point of impact as per the fired brass test. During the first cycle, I did decide to move the final group (39.7gr) up by +6 clicks as I was struggling to see my bullet impacts. In hindsight, I should not have changed this if I wished to see a shift in vertical, but in the end this was confirmed with my second string. The second string of shooting showed that all groups had the same point of impact, with no major shift in the vertical direction. This was a bit strange for me as my first test on fired brass showed vertical shifts whereas using new brass I did not see any vertical shifts.
In conclusion, I have learned that with the Lee Enfield there is a significant difference between using fire formed brass and brand new brass, especially if you have a generous chamber. I've now got a good load which can be used with the remaining 450 new brass cases and after these have been used, I can continue using my previously developed load. Back to the reloading bench I guess!
1st Round of New Brass
2nd Round of New Brass