Return to Mayberry (Service Revolvers)

Status
Not open for further replies.
"Controlled, aimed fire" from a revolver vs. "spray and pray" from a semiauto is a false dichotomy.



More than one cop has been killed while trying to reload his revolver after scoring six misses ...
 
Last edited:
Try it sometime. With targets that move and shoot back. Let us know how well you do

I will freely admit- In the events where I was taking incoming fire as a civilian (at age 18 and age 21), the situations ended before I had to actively engage with my sidearm. More probably, it would have been the Lee-Enfield or SKS in my hands at the time that would been my primary response.

How well did you do in your events?

Anyway, getting back to reality and not imagination, the Houston mag drop incident has all sorts of good lessons to learn. When the LEO in question had plenty of ammo early in the two-way engagement, he actively demonstrated the "advanced" Bullet Hose 101 technique. However, after he was down to the balance of a single partial mag recovered off the ground, what do you know- controlled aimed fire at the perp's vehicle attempting to flee the area. It all very interesting, and opens all sort of discussions, including concepts of moving to a place of cover/bracing for accuracy versus the "stand & deliver" freehand mag dump protocol.
 
Last edited:
I just retired from 29 years as a classroom teacher. We had SRO officers on campus for more than half the time. The current one is excellent. The kids seek him out. He knows their names (out of 900+ kids) and dabs them up and asks how things are going with them. Or they pull him to the side if they have a problem and want to talk to someone. That's a lot of kids growing up who see a LEO as a friend.

The officers have too much equipment hung all over them. On one hand, it's necessary. On the other, it gives them back problems (in my limited experience).
 
According to a few Deputy Sheriff's I know, the radio (backup), taser and tear gas cannister are their primary carry "weapons" and the service automatic is just for show. If a country Deputy needs a real weapon, they grab the 3" 12ga. out of the front rack or the M4 out of the trunk rack.
 
Back in the 80’s, while in the Air Force, I had to qualify with the .38 M15 revolver. Two NCO’s were required to be armed whenever we left the base with our AR15 rifles to perform military funerals. I qualified as expert. Found it easy to shoot.
 
According to a few Deputy Sheriff's I know, the radio (backup), taser and tear gas cannister are their primary carry "weapons" and the service automatic is just for show. If a country Deputy needs a real weapon, they grab the 3" 12ga. out of the front rack or the M4 out of the trunk rack.


True. Handgun keep you alive until you get to a long gun.
 
I know it's just a movie but I've always liked
the '50s depiction in "L.A. Confidential." In it,
the police, including detectives, are armed
with revolvers. But they also have very
handy at all times 12 gauge
shotguns under the seats of their cars.
 
I commented in another thread that I sometimes think it would be best if uniformed police carried classic looking DA/SA revolvers in .38 Special even today.

Someone sort of dared me to start a thread about it so here it is.

My reasoning will seem stupid to some folks and that’s fine. we are just sitting around the cracker barrel jawing and I am not yet named Emperor to simply will it so, so no threat to Static Woe.

#1. I believe a Barney Fife gun looks less threatening to the vast majority of common folks. The militarization of police is one of the reasons for the distancing of the police and other citizenry. How police look to the public IS important.

Old Bobby Peale over in England understood the Need of the Citizenry to not feel oppressed by their Government’s military forces, of course he went so far as to have Police armed only with billy clubs and a whistle, and no firearm.

Unfortunately if a cop today was using his billy and began to get the worse of things and whistled for the Hue and Cry the folks that showed up would just as likely join the bad guy as the cop.

Believe it or not Colt made a lot of money selling his 1849 .31 revolvers to pre war American police many of whom belonged to departments that did not allow a policeman to be armed with a fire arm. They liked being able to carry concealed (and against department regs) so much Colt Started his Police line on that frame.

Still the guns were in those days concealed so as to not upset the populace.

But I digress.

By the 20th Century many Police openly carried and up into the late 1980’s what most carried was a revolver.

A semi-auto matic was considered by most to be a military weapon and a weapon of war. Hollywierd even typically gave bad guys autos and good guys revolvers.

To this day there are many that see a revolver as a cop’s gun and a semi auto as a weapon of war and the revolver as a necessary thing and the semi auto as “excessive”.

Now before the LEO’s jump on my case let me say if I knew I was walking out the door now into a fight and had to have something .38 caliberish …. yes, I would personally rather tote my CZ75 than a S&W M15 Revolver…. but the whole point of policing is to serve the needs of community and not the desires of individual officers (whew, here it comes)

#2. The number of shots fired to stop a bad guy has gone up since revolver days…. and more importantly the number of MISSES has gone up. Is having more bullets flying about that missed better for the community?

Traditionally Private citizens in a “gun fight” fire less rounds than police to stop a bad guy and have fewer misses…. and as semi autos have pretty much taken over police work the numbers got worse … oddly more “civilians” (police are civilian, too) are using semi autos but still do not seem to blaze away so much as officer no longer so friendly.

If you study any sort of stressful shooting, whether shooting games or actual “combat” you will likely find that the first and second shots are most likely the ones to go where you wanted. Visit a man on man plate match some time…. sure the hot rodders never miss, but most folks have to go back for a plate, typically number three of four.

Now no one wants to send out a cop with a two shot, but for a century six was plenty.

Watch some of the officer camera films on line, you see bursts of fire with four to six shots as fast as a trigger can be pulled…. and seldom a hit.

We talk a great deal about today’s improved training and “Professionalism” but burst ofsix shots where most miss say an entire car do not look like professionally trained shooters, only shooters using “spray and pray”

Not having a 15 to 19 round magazine fed hand gun might reduce that.

#3 Todays ammunition is MUCH better than Barney’s one round of .38 Special LRN “Widow Maker”. Back when departments started going over to Semiautos most were restricted to FMJ as HP and such of the time were less than reliable with all semi autos. A.38 SPL today loaded with today’s Personal Defense Ammo is not 1Adam-12’s “Widow Maker” loaded .38.

# 4. Training flex ability.
I know “train with what you carry” but any trigger time beats NO trigger time.

Yes there are new electronic training devices but many departments are lucky to have access to older training material now stored. When I was coming along many departments did close range training with things like the Speer Plastic training round for training in such things as being attack during a traffic stop

Machines that projected moving images on a screen and one popped primed cases and the machine saw and registered where shots would have gone.

One could train with reloads that barely left the barrel on say a Hogans alley so one could concentrate on tactics more than say recoil control or sight recovery.

Revolvers gave more training options with less new equipment.

Well there I have said it and await my savaging.

Nope, not going to provide cites, this is a cracker barrel, not the reserve section of the library!

If you wish to provide cites feel free.

please keep personal attacks down to civil in case my kids are looking over my shoulders.

Have fun guys.

-kBob

I quoted you so I could easy look back up and address your comments. And for the record I work at a cop shot and will retire in ~3 years....so been here a bit, not the revolver days, but a while.

#1, you are forgetting the other side of that coin, not counting the......deal.....in Texas a little bit ago there is a reason why the "young guys" walk around looking like they are ready for battle, and that is they should be and are. When things go sideways you run to the gunfire not away, and you don't stand outside. So you are going to need that tool on your side and likely that rifle in your patrol car. Just a few years ago we went from under the shirt body armor to outer carriers, it looks so much more "military" but the trade off is you are so much cooler. Body armor does not breathe and on a 98deg day with 98% humidity it is just horrid. I had one person kill his issued cell phone with sweat...he got that sweaty it killed his phone. The days of having something like a "cool cop" are over. A cool cop is basically a hose that clips onto your AC vent and you can put the other end down your shirt. It can be 40 in that car and you are still sweating.
So it can be nice knowing these guys are....or at least should be ready to come to your aid when some crazy starts with the flying bullets.

#2, shots fired, yes the number of rounds has gone up, and personally I think this is due to the larger round count in the modern hand guns. Back in the "old days" they still had what a target shooter would call a pretty horrid rounds on target ratio. Personally I think this is very different from being in the military, there you are with your buddies day in day out.....a bad stop you are alone. And if you have never been on a two way shooting range it is a pretty stressful deal. If you go back to something like Newhall, you will see the many lessons learned, and how things changed. If you go to the North Hollywood shootout several years ago you will again see lessons learned and changes made, each one of these changes brings us closer to that "military look" for cops. You can even go back to the 30's and the hay day of people like Bonnie and Clyde or Machine gun Kelly and see the police are out gunned and they learned lessons to be on par with the "bad guys". Police type agencies are nothing but .gov and generally don't get the money they need to start with, let alone the defund the police and don't want to spend money on rifles in every car, but north hollywood told us we really do need that.

#3, true, and a few years ago we moved from 45 to 9, this is good or bad depending on your point of view, yes the performance is there with the smaller and lighter bullet, and you don't deal with the recoil as bad, helping the smaller in stature people, it also adds to your round count you have on hand, and that could be a good thing or bad thing.

#4 Training is really a non issue, different places have different policy, we just qualify once per year, but we are a pretty rural county and most of our folk shoot and hunt, some don't but with current budgets we do what we can. We also have Sim rounds and guns for training, and what could only be called the most cool video game you have ever seen with CO2 powered side arms, rifles and shotguns all tied into a computer that will lock the slide back when you go empty....cool stuff, but not equal to lead down range.

I can see where you are coming from and do understand that, but sadly in this day and age where the bad guy is likely to be wearing body armor you don't want to be stuck in a law enforcement not equipped to deal with the X. That kind of crap will really weigh on you.
 
Back in the 80’s, while in the Air Force, I had to qualify with the .38 M15 revolver. Two NCO’s were required to be armed whenever we left the base with our AR15 rifles to perform military funerals. I qualified as expert. Found it easy to shoot.

i too had some excellent, intensive, training on the s&w m10 38sp revolver in a government civilian capacity, with fine results. a dozen years earlier the army gave me a hurried, p###-poor, check-the-box, familiarization fire session, by a bunch of loudmouth sergeants, that was supposed to be qualification training, with the m1911 45acp pistol.

serious, motivated, qualified instruction trumps the choice of sidearm.

however, regardless of the issued sidearm, a society that esteems personal responsibility, common-sense, normality and sanity trumps the fellow with the badge bearing that sidearm.
 
Gotta keep up with the bad guys... Would you want a revolver going up against a guy with an AK?
A lot of the bangers the cops are going up against here in Houston are using Glock 17s with illegal full auto switches. The cartel drug flunkies are even better armed with full auto submachine guns and rifles. Even the 2-4 thug carjacking and home invasion crews are using large capacity semi autos in most cases.

I understand the cosmetics of what you are saying regarding changing how police are viewed in a lot of areas. But I work south of downtown Houston about 3 miles, and more than once this year police have had to block off streets for hours and bring in full SWAT units because a couple of warrant knocks turned into full scale shootouts with cartel bad guys. Even the college where I work has its own SWAT unit. Now I know Houston isn't typical of most American cities, but the only guy I'm likely to be evenly matched with my 1911 or Glock 36 or 43 is the road rage ****** trying to kill me because I wasn't going fast enough on the internet for his tastes.
 
.....a dozen years earlier the army gave me a hurried, p###-poor, check-the-box, familiarization fire session, by a bunch of loudmouth sergeants, that was supposed to be qualification training, with the m1911 45acp pistol....

This snippet reminds me of a fellow worker who
served with the MPs. I asked him how good was
he with the 1911. He said he hated it; got two
training sessions with it involving less than two
dozen rounds. And that was his primary weapon
when he served as an MP for his two years.
 
Well we are slowing down and perhaps it is time to stir the pot a bit.

Some great points here (in both camps) but onward and up ward.

First keep in mind despite some in government and law enforcement’s confusion, LEOs are CIVILIANS….. can I get an Amen from the vets here?

So are like the Non-Sworn ( non LEOs) “Citizens”

Them bad guys are often heavily armed. Guess what? LEOs are not the only folks they threaten.

Yet politicians, often with the support of LEOs, want to limit us “un-sworn un-born” as to what firearms we may have and what capacity those fire arms may have. Some of those politicians want to tell the night clerk at the convenience store they can not own body armor to conceal under their company shirt and home owners they can not keep a vest with spare mags, lights, and phone by the bed. (as taught by Mas Ayoob)

Ah and teaching…. Several LEOs and vets both have commented on lack of quality training. I would be willing to bet there are numerous “civilians” on this board with more training and by better instructors than 80 percent of LEOs at the Non federal level.

Yet politicians feel those lesser trained LEOs are somehow more qualified for “military grade” gear than those of us that had to pay for our own training and lost vacation days or paid work days to get it.

There are likely more than a few “un-born” here that have been on the “two way gun range” or even the very bad “one way range called IN COMING”

There are likely a few that have prevented violent felonies, perhaps multiple times.

If politicians can control what firearms and defensive equipment I can have and use, what makes LEOs think politicians will not limit them?

Can police do their job with a Barney Gun?

Sure they can. Could they perhaps do it better and safer for the officer, at least, with a 17 shot crunch and ticker … maybe.

Maybe all us “un-born” can do better and be safer with whatever we feel like toting as well.

A Lot of us do just fine with “ancient technology” Wheel guns…and also have been on two way ranges, have had good training, (and even given good training), and have experience wearing both concealed body armor and heavy vests.

Some of us question if arming LEOs with high cap semi auto pistols and actual Assault Rifles and dressing them like SciFi Storm Troopers serves the community, the Population, the Citizenry as best as can be.

It is not about what or how I would like to be armed and outfitted if I were a “Cop” but whether the Citizens (and tax payers that pay the police and for that equipment) are better off with “toning things down a bit”

-kBob
 
Lots of dumb in this thread.

1. You can't refer to police as a monolith when it comes to how things are done. Outside of the fed agencies all departments are local, county, or state level. They all run things a little differently. Each state is has different training and hiring standards. Each department in that state is going to have their own standards that either meet or exceed the state standards.

2. Before anyone starts talking about how cops with modern semi auto handguns just spray and pray vs the old days with revolvers, tell me what the hit percentages are of the revolver days vs modern. The FBI already has problems with gathering good information with modern technology. Going back to the days of the typewriter isnt going to make searching records by hand through thousands of paper databases more accurate. At best you'll have reports compiled through a select few agencies that were willing to take the time to calculate that info.

3. In the spirit of point 2, I'll take my agencies hit percentage and put it up against anyone. Last time I saw it calculated, we were a decent amount above 50 percent. But it's been a few years.

4. Beards and tattoos just are not the problem to the younger generation than it once was. Two officers I work with come to mind. Both have full sleeve tattoos. One is marvel comic book stuff and the other is Star Wars.

5. The departments have tried going with the college graduate with a squeaky clean record and no tattoos. What they are getting (not all of the time, but a decent amount) are officers who are scared to do the job.... hmmm... where have we seen that recently. Historically a large portion of the police force has come from military veterans. But if you hire the guy that's been chewing the dirt of Afghanistan and Iraq over the last 20 years he'll probably have *gasp* tattoos.

6. When Im off duty I carry a J frame 38 Special much of the time. Im fine with that because my job as an armed citizen is different. If I observe a car full of gang members do a drive by, I'm not going to chase after them. On the flip side when I am on the job I am going to chase that car. I dont want to potentially fight multiple armed suspects with a 6 shot revolver.

7. Just to clarify some stuff regarding the guy in Ohio that got shot 40 something times.
- He fled from the traffic stop in his car
- When the officer pursued him, he fired a shot out of the car window
- This shot was recorded on the officers body camera
- This shot was recorded on a nearby highway traffic camera
- A casing was found where the two videos show the shot being fired
- When he stops the car, he exits the car wearing a ski mask.... a bit odd clothing for the middle of summer
- Multiple officers chased him and when he turned back to them, reached to his waste, and then brought up his hand towards them in a drawing motion... All officers believed he was drawing a gun, and fired on him.
- So he was in fact not just some Door Dash guy that got gunned down by the police for a traffic violation.
 
I got hired as a cop in 1992 - the department still issued revolvers but approved personally owned pistols in 9mm or 45 acp were allowed.
Guy I knew that use to work in a gun store was a cop at the department, carried a revolver and had a "top gun" lapel pin.
In all seriousness, I said to him, "You know I'm going to have that top gun pin".
With my personally owned Glock 17 I handily won the "top gun" competition and again the next year with a Glock 21.
The misconception of revolvers being more accurate is just that.

Public perception? Cops should carry a handgun that puts them at a disadvantage (revolver) because of feels? No
Statistics to rationalize less capacity? No, heck no, not for cops nor the handgun (pistol) I carry everyday.

This thread should have been in general handgun discussion, I usually stay out of the revolver (antique) forum; but, this thread is an exception.
 
Lots of dumb in this thread.

7. Just to clarify some stuff regarding the guy in Ohio that got shot 40 something times.
- He fled from the traffic stop in his car
- When the officer pursued him, he fired a shot out of the car window
- This shot was recorded on the officers body camera
- This shot was recorded on a nearby highway traffic camera
- A casing was found where the two videos show the shot being fired
- When he stops the car, he exits the car wearing a ski mask.... a bit odd clothing for the middle of summer
- Multiple officers chased him and when he turned back to them, reached to his waste, and then brought up his hand towards them in a drawing motion... All officers believed he was drawing a gun, and fired on him.
- So he was in fact not just some Door Dash guy that got gunned down by the police for a traffic violation.

Coroner's report said 46 shots either hit or grazed
the fleeing driver. The shooting involved 8 LEOs.

Are we to believe that only 46 shots were fired?

The concept of "spray and pray" may well have
been at play in this case.
 
Today's carry is my S&W M-19 carried iwb in a Tucker holster with a couple HKS 10-A speed loaders in my pocket. Going old age though and just 158 JHP.

Can't believe how absolutely right this feels. Damn, it's been far too long since I felt this way.
 
Not a cop, but was an explorer scout with the PD, way back in the Barney days.

As far as "equipment", I feel too much is carried.

As to firearm, no difference in what I do, carry what you are comfortable with. Large depth that force uniformity, I can understand, but do not agree with totally.
I shoot my revolvers well. I shoot 1911s well. I don't like Glocks. Hate the triggers and grip angle. Would I be better off being forced to carry a Glock, because that is what others had?
Having a 12ga AND M4 readily available is a must.

We will not go back to Mayberry, society has deteriated too far. BUT, I would prefer the rank and file patrolman in a uniform, not dressed as a storm trooper.
 
I really don't care how I look to bystanders. I bring my people home safely at the end of every watch. If my appearance in some unfathomable way threatens and frightens you then that is the cost of doing business in this century. Monday morning QB/range rangers simply aren't up to speed. If you think going to the range and popping targets is akin to real gunfighting you are sadly mistaken. Get shot and stay in the fight and then we will talk. This is a ridiculous thread.
 
So, you approach a group of millennial, with their pants hanging off their azz, cap sideways, boom box thumping, differently than a group of 50+ year olds in business suits?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top