ruger 10-22 essential upgrades?

Status
Not open for further replies.
In it's stock form. a 10/22 is IMO arguably one of the best 22's available. it's a but spendier than a few of it's primary rivals. but it more than makes up for it in reliability. seems like there's almost nothing out there that a stock 10/22 won't send down the bore.

I put a few mods in my 10/22 that totally transformed it's shooting from merely good, to outstanding. It's still no target rifle, but it's in the 1/2" or so at 50 yards all day long now with automatch, cci, or blazer ammo.

Like others have said, a trigger job is almost a necessity. If I were to do one and only one thing to it. I would stop there. the rest of the gun really is a fine unit.

In addition, if you want to go barrel, aftermarket barrels can do wonders. I'm not a fan of bull barrels - so I hunted around and found a factory taper one. The biggest thing there is chamber - the stock chambers are very generous - which does add a lot to the reliability of the 10/22. tighter chamber helps tons. That and well, the stock barrels these days are parkerized I think. I like the old walnut and blue, so I found an old walnut stock from at least 20 years ago, and the ER Shaw factory taper I have is just a gorgeous dark blue. for me it was merely a cosmetic thing. the improvement in accuracy was a happy side effect.

With the OP having the takedown model - an aftermarket barrel might not be feasable, but there is an individual who will modify the chamber on the stock barrels. really tightens up the groups - but it does come at the cost of limiting your ammo selection. there's a chance of higher failures with some of the bulk ammo brands.

I also had a bit of work done to the bolt. not much, just tightening up and squaring off the stock dimensions.

yeah, it made my 22 a bit overpriced, I figure I spend a little over $250 on the mods. which makes it something like $500 invested in it. way too much for a 22, but it's a real nice shooter now, and still retains mot of the original ability to digest pretty much any 22 out there.


all that aside - the humble 10/22 may be the most customizable firearm in existence today. I know of no other long gun or pistol with such a wide range of styles, quantity, and quality of aftermarket replacements, doo-dad's, add-on's, and custom options. Even the mighty AR platform lacks the sheer number of total and absolute transformative options out there. Esprcially when you consider there's nothing I know of to transform an AR into a wood stocked humble looking woods gun - but the possiblities do exist to turn a 10/22 into every bit the shining example of tacticool anti zombie TEOTWAKI monster.
 
Last edited:
In it's stock form. a 10/22 is IMO arguably one of the best 22's available. it's a but spendier than a few of it's primary rivals. but it more than makes up for it in reliability. seems like there's almost nothing out there that a stock 10/22 won't send down the bore.
Hard to argue with the reliability... after having been on scores of Appleseed firing lines over the years I have seen a lot of semi .22s, and the 10/22s are the most consistently reliable.

The only thing keeping them from being a truly great rifle right out of the box is their horrible factory sights. Would it kill them to put even some sort of push/pull screws on the rear sight assembly so it could be adjusted for windage without getting out a hammer and drift? The Williams Firesights unit for the 10/22 is cheap enough and is fully screw-adjustable at the rear... you'd think over 50 years of production they could have at least come up with something along those lines that wouldn't run the cost up too much if any.
 
Enjoy it as is and don't try to make it something it's not.
So it's not really a half-MOA rifle that is barely heavier than a stock carbine but has a benchrest quality 2-stage trigger and service rifle iron sights??? For the life of me I can't understand the logic that a rifle that is exactly what I want it to be is being "something it's not". :confused::banghead::confused::banghead:

IMG_8118b.jpg


So it's not really a midnight varmint killing machine? I only imagined it being better for its purpose than a stock carbine???

IMG_9052b.jpg
 
henschman said:
Hard to argue with the reliability... after having been on scores of Appleseed firing lines over the years I have seen a lot of semi .22s, and the 10/22s are the most consistently reliable.

In other 10/22 threads I've mentioned the terrible family shame of a firearm that lives one of our mules at the ranch, and how it's convinced me that a Ruger 10/22 can't be killed short of dropping it in the fires of Mt. Doom. Well, I finally decided to take a picture of it:

20141115_134751_zps37095ee9.jpg

It has never failed to fire and maintains minute of armadillo accuracy out to about 100 yards. The best .22 carbine out there IMHO.
 
So it's not really a half-MOA rifle that is barely heavier than a stock carbine but has a benchrest quality 2-stage trigger and service rifle iron sights??? For the life of me I can't understand the logic that a rifle that is exactly what I want it to be is being "something it's not". :confused::banghead::confused::banghead:

IMG_8118b.jpg




So it's not really a midnight varmint killing machine? I only imagined it being better for its purpose than a stock carbine???

IMG_9052b.jpg

That's top rifle is not a Ruger receiver gun, correct?
 
What do you actually NEED? As stated above, ammunition.
What do you WANT is another issue. You can spend enough on pimping it out to equal or surpass the cost of a Cooper or Anschutz. The rest is up to you and your willingness to dig into your pockets.

Please just remember- a $250 rifle is still a $250 rifle. You will be able to kill rodents and such but will never qualify for an Olympic slot with it.
That's why you buy an action and build it from the ground up.
 
In other 10/22 threads I've mentioned the terrible family shame of a firearm that lives one of our mules at the ranch, and how it's convinced me that a Ruger 10/22 can't be killed short of dropping it in the fires of Mt. Doom. Well, I finally decided to take a picture of it:

20141115_134751_zps37095ee9.jpg

It has never failed to fire and maintains minute of armadillo accuracy out to about 100 yards. The best .22 carbine out there IMHO.
Now that there is a rifle with a lot of character.

Bet there's a lot of good stories & memories around that rifle.
 
I have had the same 10/22 for 23 years, it was accurate and reliable out of the box and still is. I recently tied for first in a sporter match, me shooting a good CZ 452, the other guy an older stock 10/22. My Marlin 75 never shot anywhere near as accurate as my 10/22.
 
I can just get the stock in with the scope (Nikon) attached. I'd hate to have to detach it each time. That said, I have low rings, which makes the takedown action a little (but only a little) trick because when turning the barrel end, it may touch the bottom of the scope. But there's a technique that allows it all to work.
For the OP, the only part I added (beside scope and rings) was the VQ bolt release mod. Getting the bolt closed with the stock part was, at times, very frustrating.
There's a gazillion things you can do to the 10/22. I'd much rather just shoot it.
B
 
If you are seriously getting ready to drop 600 on a 10/22 do yourself a favor and look at either a miroku browning automatic, or a winchester 63. These are what a semi auto 22 is supposed to be.
 
Essential = Ammo + Practice

Almost Essential = Better Sights or a Scope

After those, I think the best thing to add is a good suppressor. It just makes shooting much more enjoyable.

The more I think about it, if one of your intended uses for this weapon is as a BUGOUT gun , a suppressor moves up pretty close to "essential" in my opinion (especially if this is your only rifle).

An accurate suppressed 10-22 and a couple of bricks of quality subsonic ammo are more likely to keep you and yours safe and fed during hard times than a whole safe full of AR's, AK's, M1A's and H&K's ever would.
 
Last edited:
The only thing I do to my 10/22s is drop in a VQ hammer---gets the trigger pulls down to 3---3.5 lbs. I don't even use the springs they give you---just the hammer into all the original factory parts.
 
10/22.

The only modification I have done to my 10/22 is glued two 10 round magazines together back to back. That way, I have ten 60 grain rounds in one magazine that hit dead on at 50 yards and ten 40 grain rounds in the other magazine that is dead on at 100 yards. Most my varmint hunting is done at night time when you can’t see a thing. I mounted a PVS-4 starlight night scope on my rifle. I can hit a beer can at 100 yards day or night with this rifle. :)
 

Attachments

  • pvs-4.jpg
    pvs-4.jpg
    46.7 KB · Views: 16
Last edited:
The only thing I do to my 10/22s is drop in a VQ hammer---gets the trigger pulls down to 3---3.5 lbs. I don't even use the springs they give you---just the hammer into all the original factory parts.

I installed the trigger return spring when it came in and it wouldn't reset the trigger, so I went back to the Ruger spring by necessity. But, as you say, the hammer/sear alone was a huge improvement. It made an even bigger improvement on my Remington 597 magnum when I installed the hammer. That one didn't even come with springs.

I think I've said it already, but the only mods I made are a Hogue stock because I like it and a scope because the stock sights are pretty crappy. I've thought of putting an aperture sight on it, but I got a new .22 with an aperture on it that I like, so I think I'll stick with the scope. :D Besides, I've got 62 year old eyes that were never that good in the first place.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top