Should rule two be revised or reworded?

[Owen Sparks]

I started this thread and it would suit me if it were closed.

 

[Warp]

Anybody with a reasonable level of intelligence and firearm experience that reads this thread along ago decided that you don't get it. I am not trying nor do I need to try to explain it to you. Others have done so already.

 

[Loosedhorse]

No, Warp.

I do not presume, as you do, that posters at The High Road who disagree do not have "a reasonable level of intelligence and firearm experience"--I just assume they hold a different opinion, and I respect that. That's the High Road thing to do.

Many posters here have said they prefer the rules as is, and that's fine. I see no need to respond to their reasonable comments; only to read and consider them.

It is the folks like you and we are not amused who have decided to insult people who express a different opinion. It is an antigunner's tactic, as I have shown, and very low road. And now, you've even decided to insult the High Road membership generally by presuming to speak for them, saying that they join in your assumptions regarding the inexperience and lack of intelligence of others here.

I started this thread and it would suit me if it were closed.

Here, here. I second the motion.

 

[Warp]

Actually you have it backwards as I was joining their statements...not the other way around.

 

[Loosedhorse]

Actually you have it backwards as I was joining their statements...not the other way around

Very few posters here have made insults. You wear the fact that you have joined those few as a badge? Fine; it marks you for who you are.

 

[Kleanbore]

Enough.