I know that the Sig P226 is highly regarded in 9mm by many paramilitary units the world over, including the SEALs.
However, this is in 9mm, and I'm looking for something as highly regarded in .45ACP.
Basically, without the need for a double-strike capacity (i.e. external hammer verse striker fired), would you consider the Glock in .45 as reliable, durable and worthy as a SIG-Sauer?
Or should I just go with the SIG. I already own a Glock .40 S&W, a CZ-75B 9mm, and a Ruger Revolver.
I'm obsessed with reliability and durability issues, as this will be my primary carry weapon from now on.
A genuine thank you for your anticipated feedback.
However, this is in 9mm, and I'm looking for something as highly regarded in .45ACP.
Basically, without the need for a double-strike capacity (i.e. external hammer verse striker fired), would you consider the Glock in .45 as reliable, durable and worthy as a SIG-Sauer?
Or should I just go with the SIG. I already own a Glock .40 S&W, a CZ-75B 9mm, and a Ruger Revolver.
I'm obsessed with reliability and durability issues, as this will be my primary carry weapon from now on.
A genuine thank you for your anticipated feedback.