its too bad that he uses a law made to help LEOs so that he can carry concealed. Once I found that out, I lost all respect for him.Ted is great on the 2nd, self defense and illegal immigration but some of his other stances are a little out there
its too bad that he uses a law made to help LEOs so that he can carry concealed. Once I found that out, I lost all respect for him.Ted is great on the 2nd, self defense and illegal immigration but some of his other stances are a little out there
Ted Nugent has a right to his own life. That should reconcile his words with his deeds.
Corrupt men cannot be trusted...
It will not be the fault of the rotten anti-Americans out there who don't believe in individual rights that rape and pillage our Constitution, it will be the fault of those who know better but failed to speak up.
I also find it interesting that Nugent feels anyone who doesn't agree with the Constitution in the way he does is anti-American. I guess every group championing amendments to the Constitution are anti-American too, which makes for some interesting considerations
So in other words you believe in rule by military junta.John Wayne was another chicken hawk. Charlie Daniels is yet another.
I loathe chicken hawks.
No wonder the government succeeds in taking away our liberties.
Joe Demko said:When that totally awesome draft dodger indulges in rhetoric like this, it makes me want to hurl. It spites me to be on the same side as that POS with respect to gun rights.
Many people believe that mandatory conscription is a form of slavery.
junyo said:The messenger doesn't change the validity of the message, and to impugn the character of the messenger instead of addressing the content of the message is an all to common logical fallacy.
(Don't read alot into the racial context of the example above. It was just an example of how the speakers reputation can impact the speech.)
Rachen said:We understand
The government works for "we the people", not the other way around
EDIT: Rachen, what's that "Loves Mao" thing about?
Rachen said:But I don't mind at all.
Some one supports the 2A and you guys whine about f'ing paragraphs.
No wonder the government succeeds in taking away our liberties.
When that totally awesome draft dodger indulges in rhetoric like this, it makes me want to hurl. It spites me to be on the same side as that POS with respect to gun rights.
I also find it interesting that Nugent feels anyone who doesn't agree with the Constitution in the way he does is anti-American. I guess every group championing amendments to the Constitution are anti-American too, which makes for some interesting considerations.
I consider Ted to be a vital part of our fight for rights. Sometimes you need to have a calm, intellectual discussion about politics and the Constitution. Sometimes you need to turn the Nugent firehose on a moron, though. Each has its place.
So in other words you believe in rule by military junta.
John Wayne was another chicken hawk. Charlie Daniels is yet another.
I loathe chicken hawks.
Ted's a nut. I got nothin for the guy. A friend of mine was a hunting guide for him a couple times. My friend will speak badly about very very few people in this world. Ted's on his short list of complete idiots.
Um, no...and there is nothing I posted that in any way indicates that.
What I object to is some miserable pile of dung who weaseled out of the military when he had the chance to serve being all oorah and pro-war now. I especially want to kick his teeth in for running his mouth in interviews about what he would have done if he'd been there. What a mendacious, contemptible POS Nugent is...and yet ya'll line up to kiss his *** because he says things you like about guns now.
I may agree with him about the 2A, but I wouldn't piss on him if he was on fire.