CapnMac
Member
My thanks to Bartholomew Roberts for the reference.
Mind, I've been told by more than one County Prosecutor that §45.15(b)(3) would only apply after arrest until a test case went through the AG's office.
None of that much helped by the "generally recognized" part--if a body ahs not hiked and/or camped in javelina country the need for quite a lot of 'discouragement' may not be recognized, generally or specifically.
I'm still feeling hopeful after having read the HB 910 text. This looks to be a net gain for Texas.
Mind, I expect that there will be a BBQ rig or two to be seen in Lockhart, Thrall, and the like. And equally unlikely at County Line in Traxis Co (and for sure not at Artz).
Mind, I've been told by more than one County Prosecutor that §45.15(b)(3) would only apply after arrest until a test case went through the AG's office.
None of that much helped by the "generally recognized" part--if a body ahs not hiked and/or camped in javelina country the need for quite a lot of 'discouragement' may not be recognized, generally or specifically.
I'm still feeling hopeful after having read the HB 910 text. This looks to be a net gain for Texas.
Mind, I expect that there will be a BBQ rig or two to be seen in Lockhart, Thrall, and the like. And equally unlikely at County Line in Traxis Co (and for sure not at Artz).