This place doesn't sound like The High Road anymore...

Status
Not open for further replies.
I find it a bit disheartening that the thread starter, and others, are being accused of being "people with overly thin skins." In my view, those who would say that still don't get it ...

Were you offended when that same level of nastiness was aimed at Bill Clinton?
Yes I was. And if somehow Hillary Clinton is elected, I'll be offended if (when) the inevitable stupid nicknames begin ... (Even though I loath the woman with every fiber of my being.)

If not, then it's not the tone that bothers you, it's the fact that it's aimed at YOUR GUY.
This is what really amuses me -- as though anyone would think that -- even IF George Bush was "my guy" -- he needs me to defend him on a freakin' internet forum! It's almost insulting to think that some would think that I think I need to defend him on an internet forum ...

Surprise, surprise... Not everyone here worships George Bush.
Sarcasm not required here -- most of us get this!

Deal With It
Maybe I'm being think-skinned here ... but that's a comment that I always rather regard as insulting ...

PS If you complained about the attacks on Clinton, too, then you are standing up for the office, not the man. In which case, I owe you an apology.
Another thing I find ironic ... when I stand up for the office -- I am labeled an "apologist" and a "statist." Hmm ...
But thank you.

Statist apologist is no more of a "Personal Attack" than calling someone a NeoConservative or libertarian.No, of course not -- because it's simply another label that in the great scheme of things means absolutely nought.
 
cropcirclewalker said:
I guess sometimes my writing skills can't keep up with my rapid-fire thoughts.

A multipart question.
1) is the threads author wrong? Yes. Please see L&P purpose for existance.

Odd. The moderators who have posted in this thread seem to disagree with you. Healthy debate is welcomed, personal attacks and slander are not.

2) Do I think he had to sustain such personal attacks? Yes.
Poke a bear with a sharp stick and you will get to sustain an attack. He was not forced to start up this non-conforming and ill-conceived thread.

Interesting suppositions. You know nothing about me. Nobody poked me with a stick. I just got tired of all of the childish rantings.

What he did is severally similar to going to a hockey game and asking the spectators to please stop yelling.

This is the internet and I'm darned glad of it.

No, I went to a hockey game where the spectators were beating each other with 2x4s and asked them to yell instead of beating each other. Do you see the difference? :confused:

This thread is proving to me more and more that L&P has been overrun. I am saddened, but not surprised at all by the comments that have been directed at me by so many people who feel they know me well enough to make such comments that are intended to do nothing more than to shut the peanut gallery up.

All I asked for was civility, what I got was more of the same, but with an added dose of rancor.
 
All right. I think this one's gone far enough.

If you want to help us out, please use the little red triangle at the bottom left corner of the screen to report anything you think moderators really should see.

If someone's posting style annoys you, you can either use the ignore feature, ignore the problem poster the old-fashioned way, or drive them crazy by consistently responding to their inanities in a calmly logical fashion which does not include name-calling.

Thread closed.

pax
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top