Type 99 Arisaka questions

Status
Not open for further replies.

Jack Package

Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2014
Messages
76
Location
The Great Country of Texas
Hey, I am new to the form and new to the Type 99 Arisaka. I recently got one at a gun show for a steal and know pretty much nothing about the rifle. Is it similar to having a Kar98k and a mosin? I have heard that some of them can be really dangerous with the wrong type of ammo. Will appreciate any help!!!
 
i own and shoot one in 7.7 and its a very good rifle, please post pictures.eastbank.
 
To answer your questions, the Arisaka action is basically a Mauser with some "improvements". The 7.7 round is approximately the same ballistically as the 30-06 and the 7.62x54. The safety is not as straight forward as the Mauser but is easier to work than the MN. Bolt disassembly is very easy and I have never seen a broken firing pin. Shoot it as is, they don't make very attractive sporters. Some people have said the Type 99's are not safe because of a few "last ditch effort" rifles. Any that have survived 60 to 70 years since they were made are surely OK for a few more.
 
Need more info and good photo's of the receiver & tang.

Some of the 'last ditch' Type 99 Ariska's had cast iron receivers with the rear tang cast in one piece with the receiver.

They Are Not safe to shoot with any ammo!

Post photo's and markings and someone will have enough information to steer you safely.

Otherwise, not so much!

rc
 
My rifle builder of choice, he usually prefers to work on '03 Springfields, tells me that the Type 99 action was the strongest action to come out of WW II.

The danger of course comes from ones that were converted to other chamberings by less than proficient gunsmiths. As with all surplus guns, it is a good idea to have them checked by a reputable gunsmith for headspace

Does yours have an intact Chrysanthemum stamp on the top rear of the action?
 
I have a kar98k, m1903 Springfield and I find it funny how all the bolts are the same. I will try to post pictures as soon as possible. I have only shot it a handful of times and it was on point haven't got to do any real accuracy tests yet. What about the mum I know that at the end of the war the US government let the Japaneses government grind off all the mums. Mine still has it but it looks like someone took a bayonet to it and put 4 good cuts into it. Possibly a souvenir gun?
 
Interesting weapon, I've heard the "last ditch weapon" store before too but this one seems ok to me.

IMAG0032_zpsz5z5f0v2.jpg

IMAG0033_zpsj7yjqfpv.jpg

IMAG0035_zpsrpee8xts.jpg
 
For many years the Japanese military rifles were looked down upon because of their rough appearance and their less than butter smooth operation. But in recent decades they have been given more credit for what they are; brilliantly designed and well built weapons which were far ahead of their time in many areas.

The Japanese were the first to realize the advantages of a chrome lined bore in tropical environments; it doesn't rust. It is also rather impervious to corrosive ammo. The entire bolt and firing mechanism consists of only six parts; bolt body, extractor, extractor collar, firing pin, firing pin spring and safety knob. The two piece stock is ugly, but it saves wood. The bolt cover did a good job keeping dirt out of the receiver and a smart soldier knew that pinching it slightly eliminated the rattling sounds it made.

The bad ones are easy to spot. The upper tang at the rear of the receiver will be intregal WITH the receiver. The receiver itself will have almost no machining marks because it is a cast piece. The bore will not be chrome lined and the rear sight, if there is one, will usually be a simple apature tack welded to the barrel. The safety knob will probably be smooth, without the knurling present on a production piece.

Which brings us around to ammo. 7.7 Japanese ammo is the easiest thing in the world to make. Run 30-06 cases into a 7.7 full length die and trim the neck. Use 303 British loading data. There were rumors, spread years ago, that the 7.7 Japanese round is larger than the 30-06 at the base, and that it was dangerous to make ammo from 06 brass. Not true! Go look it up in Cartridges of the world. They are within a couple of thousands of each other, with the 7.7 actually being the smaller of the two.

I have found that my 7.7s are pretty much equal to any Mauser or Springfield I have fired. I get two inch groups with all of them on a good day

Enjoy that Arisaka!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top