AJC1
Member
The difference between mag and regular is important but not for the reason most people use them 1. They have slightly more power, useful for cold weather and hard to ignite powder like h110. 2. That additional power will unsettle the case more and raw accuracy will be effected. Most people don't shoot good enough or have guns capable of those differences. The ppc cartridge uses a small primer for this reason.Walkalong,
Thanks for your response. I learned on another THR reloading thread that powder choice is a driver on what primer must be used. I also see how every reloading manual I have and see online seem to default on regular primers for standard calibers and magnum primers for magnum calibers. That is my confusion.
I am specifically referring to N340. I look up load data from the Vihtavuori app on .38 and .357. Same powder (N340), same projectile (158gr XTP), but .38 load calls for SPP and .357 calls for SP magnum primers.
.38 Spl powder range (5.2-5.8 grains) is less than .357 (7.1-8.6 grains).
So my question is if I work up a warm-hot load for the .357 (say 8.0-8.2 grains), can I effectively use standard small pistol primers?
I would anticipate a slight difference in velocities, but I would not expect it to be significant…or am I wrong?
Finally, these rounds would be used in both a 4” GP-100 and a 18” lever action rifle.
I know the best thing to do would be to ladder some loads with both SPP and SPM primers, shoot through a chronograph, check accuracy, and analyze data for best loads…and at some point in my evolving reloading life, I will. But I don’t have the time or resources to really get that deep at the present time.
So I’m just trying to be safe and conservative on this load. And the bottom-line question I am asking is if I can use SPP with the .357 load safely based on the scenario above.
Thanks!
To your question directly yes use spp unless you observe an ignition problem or your SD numbers show irratic ignition