gc70
Member
Cosmoline said:I suppose that may be the thinking, but it's still a horrible idea. First off that target demographic is small and getting smaller. The "middle aged moderate" is highly likely to either play or be aware of violent video games. And since they didn't make HIM a killer, he's going to be very suspicious of claims to the contrary.
The only people this might reach are older women who simply have never played the games and might have an inherent dislike of violent games. Maybe Wayne things he can distract the women with this kind of sideshow, but I think he's again way out of touch with the times. The older liberal women I know don't like violent games, but they aren't about to fall for rhetoric this out of date or stupid.
Look at the December 19th Gallup poll. 78% of poll respondents thought that "decreasing the depiction of gun violence on TV, in movies, and in video games" would either be "very effective" or "somewhat effective" in "preventing mass shootings at schools."
The relatively small numbers of people who are well informed about guns, or video games, or etc. will not be the deciding factor in this debate. The outcome of this discussion hinges on perceptions held, or developed, by the masses of the uninformed. To the extent that we can get the attention of those masses -even by pandering to their prejudices- and get to them to listen to our arguments, the better off we are.
Gun owners, through the NRA or otherwise, must reach out to sway the opinions of the masses because our opponents are certainly busy doing so.