bats v. blades
A solid smack to the head with a baseball bat would likely remove the threat quicker than a slash/stab to some other part of the body. Head=CNS=immediate incapacitation.
The good Mr. Lee makes a good point there.
In general, if you can crack that pumpkin and damage the neural tissue inputing sensory information or motor regions routing action potentials to the muscles, or better yet, the brainstem (lower back of skull near intersection with spinal cord), then instant incapacitation. Battle over (at least that part of it).
Problem i still have with a bat is time & room to swing. Not that i have anything against bats. I've had one nearby for years. Part of the arsenal (and during graduate school days when I couldn't afford a gun for a short time, it was THE arsenal. Never again, thanks.)
But if we're talking what would i grab in the middle of the night other than a K9 or 870, "bat" just still isn't my first choice.
I'm actually leaning towards the short sword side right now. I've even been looking at some on line, just for grins of course (
). {{{Darnit people, quit posting such interesting threads! I've got work to do!
}}}
<WARNING! non expert warrior pontificating ahead; hip boots may be required...>
I'm thinking the guy has just surprized me by jumping from around a corner or i'm trying to get out of bed quickly cause i've just realized he's only 10' away and coming on, so I've got seconds to grab a weapon. (As opposed to lots of time to prepare a strategy.)
To be effective, a bat needs to be raised and lowered with force. I guess a jabbing gut punch would be useful as a first pass, then a head whack, but that incapacitating head blow would require raising above head or to the side over shoulder (as in baseball), and then a return.
Same thing for a hatchet, tomahawk, machete: up first, then down.
For a smaller guy like me (~140#), that's a lot of mass to accelerate, decelerate, then accelerate again towards a pumpkin with enough force to crack it.
Or am i missing something here? Is "ready" for such a weapon in the "up position" rather than "low ready"? Seems like that would be unwieldly and tiring. I wouldn't want to remain that way long. Balance issues, easier disarmed with arms up and back, etc.
<Reminder: I'm not an expert fighter with such weapons. Hell, I'm not an expert fighter with ANY weapons...just thinking out loud trying to learn something...>
But if I've got a razor sharp sword with a 20" blade with a real pointy tip, from a low position (remember, i just picked it up, or am walking with it at low ready) it seems one could either:
1) come nearly straight in with an upward (45*) jab through the upper abdomen, through the diaphragm up into the rib cage from below and into the heart and/or lungs. There's an aarta in there as well. Incapacitation is not as quick as a head shot, but the stroke with a 3# sword is faster than that with a 5# bat, and with fewer strokes.
or 2) take a slashing swing across face or neck area, then jab.
If he tries to grab it on the way in, or take it away from me using the blade, his fingers & hands are going to pay dearly. (Unlike with a bat.)
Honestly, if it were me, and i had to choose between facing a bat or a sword, i think i'd take the bat. I'm pretty fast on my feet, so something tells me i could move outta the bats path quicker than the blade. (Geez, i hope i never have to make that decision...)
OK, I know someone can erither blugeon my thinking or cut it up with a sword. I know there are lots of knife and or pole fighters in here.
Show me the errors in my thinking.
N~