TTv2
Member
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2016
- Messages
- 4,990
Every gun I've let go had an issue of some sort, but those that work fine and I shoot well would be kept because that's kind of the point of buying guns is you take what you discovered in your research and philosophical use and see if it pans out in the real world.
This question tho reminds me of all those who have said over the years how they use to own and shoot Tokarevs, which they admitted were fine shooters and reliable, but then sold them the minute the cheap milsurp ammo dried up.
When I hear that I'm dismayed because these people got a lot of trigger time with one gun, became proficient with it, it proved to be reliable and they were likely bought cheap so that holding onto it for years with a few boxes of ammo for a time of need wouldn't cripple them financially, but nope, as soon as ammo cost goes up that's the end of the ownership of that firearm.
It would be like if there was a 9mm tax where all 9mm ammo was taxed at a rate that tripled its price how many people would sell their trusty 9mm's and switch to .40, .45, .380, etc.
This question tho reminds me of all those who have said over the years how they use to own and shoot Tokarevs, which they admitted were fine shooters and reliable, but then sold them the minute the cheap milsurp ammo dried up.
When I hear that I'm dismayed because these people got a lot of trigger time with one gun, became proficient with it, it proved to be reliable and they were likely bought cheap so that holding onto it for years with a few boxes of ammo for a time of need wouldn't cripple them financially, but nope, as soon as ammo cost goes up that's the end of the ownership of that firearm.
It would be like if there was a 9mm tax where all 9mm ammo was taxed at a rate that tripled its price how many people would sell their trusty 9mm's and switch to .40, .45, .380, etc.