C-grunt
Member
Like I said before, the military has been dirt napping people with short barrel 5.56 guns since Vietnam. I dont think 50 years of combat use makes something a "fad".
Like I said before, the military has been dirt napping people with short barrel 5.56 guns since Vietnam. I dont think 50 years of combat use makes something a "fad".
ITS A FAD
Whatever makes you feel better/smarter/superior.ITS A FAD
So home invasions and burglaries are a thing of the past? When did that happen???The odds of you using one of these in defense legally are probably along the lines of getting attacked by a polar bear and a regular bear in the same day.
Nobody came close to drawing the same comparison mid 1911 fad a decade ago.
Nobody at all.
The odds of you using one of these in defense legally are probably along the lines of getting attacked by a polar bear and a regular bear in the same day.
ITS A FAD
Nobody came close to drawing the same comparison mid 1911 fad a decade ago.
Nobody at all.
The odds of you using one of these in defense legally are probably along the lines of getting attacked by a polar bear and a regular bear in the same day.
ITS A FAD
An very good reason is that pistols are allowed in shotgun zones in my state. I have considered building one for that purpose. Not crazy about the noise and muzzle blast though.I've been scratching my head as to why every one is going in the direction of ultra-short AR pistol builds. I understand the whole pistol brace situation, but don't you think the short barrels are seriously handicapping the velocity and accuracy potential of the weapon? Just to make it a little bit shorter? To me, the trade off isn't worth it. What are your thoughts? Thanks!
Even without a stock that Thompson is about 8.5 pounds. I think 12Bravo20 outlined the various practical reasons for owning an AR pistol quite well. For those who don't think they have any practical purposes, how many of you have at least one gun you got 'just because' even if it doesn't serve any (or more than one) practical purpose(s). Nothing wrong with that for a reason to get a particular gun. Benjamin Franklin eloquently said "We must, indeed, all hang together or, most assuredly, we shall all hang separately." Never has it been more true than now.
Nobody came close to drawing the same comparison mid 1911 fad a decade ago.
Nobody at all.
The odds of you using one of these in defense legally are probably along the lines of getting attacked by a polar bear and a regular bear in the same day.
ITS A FAD
I've been scratching my head as to why every one is going in the direction of ultra-short AR pistol builds.
This thread need more pistol AR pictures!
.
Not at all. I put that comment in to point out that if you were trying to show that a small, light, SMG type weapon were the attraction, that was the worst possible example, as the Thompson weighs as much as the standard issue rifle of the time. A Walther MPK or a Jatimatic would have been a better example to prove your point. And I think that while that may be true for some, it's not the major reason AR pistols are popular. Sure, many of them are range toys, but they do fill several practical purposes.So the issue for you is the weight? Thompson design is 100 years old.
That is funny! Lol
I don’t always shower, but when I do, it’s with an AR and a frown.
Stay short my friends...