Llama Bob
member
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2016
- Messages
- 2,258
I still don't buy it. By that logic a badly overbore gun ( .264 Winchester for example) should be the most efficient. Large sharp shoulder, small bore compared to case capacity should provide lots of opportunity to burn powder. But we all know they are not efficient.
One aspect of the Sebert Factor is that efficiency goes down as charge volume goes up, since it's the fraction of the powder mass that travels with the bullet. A cartridge with SF = .5 and 50 grains of powder is more efficient than one with SF = .5 and 70 grains of powder. This suggests that the most efficient cartridges should have a 40 degree or sharper shoulder, be fat, and have a small case capacity - for example things like the 6mm Dasher. This seems to more or less dovetail with reality.
Ultimately, whether you 'buy' this simulation methodology or not, it works and accurately describes the performance of the various cartridges.