• You are using the old High Contrast theme. We have installed a new dark theme for you, called UI.X. This will work better with the new upgrade of our software. You can select it at the bottom of any page.

Zumbo Writes Congress

Status
Not open for further replies.

Sheldon J

Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2005
Messages
989
Location
Cereal City, Michigan
After reading this I can almost like the guy.
An Open Letter to the United States Senate

Dear Honorable Ladies and Gentlemen:

It recently came to my attention that one of your colleagues, Michigan Sen. Carl Levin, has chosen to attack firearms owners using remarks I wrote in mid-February as his launch pad. As you probably know, Sen. Levin has been making anti-gun speeches every week for the past eight years because of a promise he made to the Economic Club of Detroit in May 1999.

Mr. Levin has an agenda, and he should have spoken to me before using my name in one of his speeches, especially since his remarks were entered into the Congressional Record. I would like my remarks here entered into the Congressional Record as well.

Sen. Levin is only one of 16 members of the Senate to vote against the Vitter Amendment to the Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act. This amendment prohibits the confiscation of a privately-owned firearm during an emergency or major disaster when possession of that gun is not prohibited under state or federal law.

Eighty-four senators voted for that amendment, inspired by the egregious confiscation of firearms from the citizens of New Orleans following Hurricane Katrina in the summer of 2005. Those seizures, you will recall, led the Second Amendment Foundation and National Rifle Association to join in a landmark civil rights lawsuit in federal court that brought the confiscations to an abrupt end.

The taking of private property without warrant or probable cause - even firearms - was considered an outrage by millions of American citizens, and yet Sen. Levin joined 15 of his colleagues in voting against this measure. It is no small wonder that Sen. Levin gets an "F" rating from gun rights organizations. He would have American citizens disarmed and left defenseless at a time when they need their firearms the most, when social order collapses into anarchy and protecting one's self and one's family is not simply a right and responsibility, it becomes a necessity.

That in mind, Sen. Levin must know that almost immediately after I wrote those remarks, I recanted and apologized to the millions of Americans who lawfully and responsibly own, compete with and hunt with semi-automatic rifles. I took a "crash course" on these firearms and visited with my good friend Ted Nugent on his ranch in Texas, where I personally shot an AR-15 and educated myself with these firearms.

Some of us learn from our mistakes, others keep making them. Legislation to which Sen. Levin alluded, HR 1022, would renew the ban on so-called "assault weapons," and dangerously expand it to encompass far more perfectly legal firearms. For the Congress of the United States to even consider such legislation is an affront to every law-abiding firearms owner in this country.

This legislation that Sen. Levin appears to endorse is written so broadly as outlaw not only firearms, but accessories, including a folding stock for a Ruger rifle. As I understand the language of this bill, it could ultimately take away my timeworn and cherished hunting rifles and shotguns - firearms I hope to one day pass on to my grandchildren - as well as millions of identical and similar firearms owned by other American citizens.

It is clear to me that the supporters of this legislation don't want to stop criminals. They want to invent new ones out of people like me, and many of you, and your constituents, friends, neighbors and members of your families. They will do anything they can, go to any extremes they believe necessary, to make it impossible for more and more American citizens to legally own any firearm.

In his final paragraph, Senator Levin misrepresents what I said. I never spoke in favor of a general assault weapons ban. Again, I immediately apologized for my blog statement that was exclusively directed toward hunting and not gun ownership.

I will not allow my name to be associated with this kind of attack on the Second Amendment rights of my fellow citizens.

A few weeks ago, in a letter to Alan Gottlieb, chairman of the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms, I promised to educate my fellow hunters about this insidious legislation "even if I have to visit every hunting camp and climb into every duck blind and deer stand in this country to get it done."

I will amend that to add that I will bring my effort to Capitol Hill if necessary, even if I have to knock on every door and camp in every office of the United States Senate. In promoting this ban, the Hon. Carl Levin does not speak for me, or anybody I know.

Sincerely,
James Zumbo
Cody, Wyoming
 
I think it's more logical that he conversed with individuals who broke through his self-imposed isolation, and he now realizes the stakes, and that it's not just AKs or ARs they want. Furthermore he may even realize that AKs or ARs aren't that different from other guns.

If we're going to be good people we're supposed to support positive behaviour. We slapped him with the rolled-up newspaper already, now it's time for a pat on the head.
 
Lonegunman--------Are you always so negative?? Seems that way. Or are you just that way to start conversation? ??? I can even forgive my most evil enemies but you seem so hard. Is it just a ruse???? or has live made you that way???????? :(
 
You know what? The guy seems to be honestly changing his opinion and is making things right.

I have no problem with that and applaud him on it.
 
Now all of them congress-critters are sitting around asking, "Does anyone know who this Jim person is....?" :uhoh:

I don't think they have a clue... I doubt that any follow The High Road or other forums like it... :banghead:
 
Traitor Zumbo's rant will come back to haunt REAL FIREARM OWNERS forever. This isn't the last time the anti's will quote him.
 
I don't think my comments were negative, just an accurate assessment of what Zumbo is doing.

He made his comments in a hunting blog because he didnt think people reading it would care. It filled his column for the day, and allowed him to pontificate about things he new very little about. Then he got busted by his readers. He discovered what he said was very, very unpopular. He lost sponsors, lost his colum, and therefore lost his source of income.

Now that he is jobless, he seems to be doing anything he can to make up for what he said. I can't imagine any grown man would be so fickle as to be able to change his mind on an issue this big in such a short span of time unless there was some reason for him to change his mind. That reason, of course, is money in the case of Zumbo.

Unless he can get popular again with hunters and shooters, he won't have a job as an outdoor writer. So now he is saying whatever he can to make it look like he has changed his position. Maybe he has, but more likely he is just following his paycheck.

He has provided the anti-gunners with an endless supply of ammunition. He will be quoted now as a hunter and outdoorsman who understands the "common sense" of banning black rifles. The anti-gunners will never quote his letters to Congress where he tried to retract his statements.

Poor Zumbo. He should have learned from the Dixie Chicks, but apparently was too dumb. Sometimes its better to keep your opinions quiet, and the paychecks coming.
 
Yea, there is no way that Zumbo could have "learned" anything about the Second Amendment, private gun ownership and Anti-Gun politics. People just can't learn, look at the Dixie Chicks. Once lost, always lost. If ever, anyone, ever utters a word contrary to an opinion that they once held (no matter how wrong the original opinion was, or how un-educated they were on the subject) they can never, ever, be taken seriously.

If anyone and anytime ever changes their minds on any subject for any reason, they are hypocritical. Changing one's mind on any subject and anytime in one's life, regardless of their experience or information gained, is a sign of being silly and stupid.

For any of us to ever look upon anyone who reconsiders their actions and words and then recants them and makes amends for them, as anything but a kook and worthless, well, we are wasting our time. Someone is either always all good, or alway all bad. Once you step off the reservation, you are hereby barred from ever returning.

No matter what good someone can bring to the table, it is not worth the effort, because they uttered something stupid in the past. Look at the Dixie Chicks, they will never, ever be able to sell another record with a country song on it ever again.

Or.......maybe I am wrong, maybe I am sorry for the above rant. Perhaps I should not have put my thoughts on the screen. It is OK, I can always go to the Brady Blog, they love me there :banghead:

Besides, if I can't say something negative, I ain't going to say nothing at all;)

(PS. I have the Dixie Chicks on my IPOD)
 
Last edited:
Amend...

There are of course many folks that own guns, but don't have the foggiest idea of what the Second Amendment is or what it means. Further, they couldn't care less unless they perceive a threat to what ever they use their guns for - and the rest can go to.... well you know where.

Zumbo was one who had that kind of mindset. He may have changed his mind for economic reasons, but I doubt that way down inside he's changed his attitude.
 
People just can't learn, look at the Dixie Chicks.

Bad example in this context. They apologized initially, but then quickly recanted their apology and got even worse. Their actions demonstrate their apology was market driven, as was their desire to increase the controversy, using it to expand their market base outside the pop-country realm.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top