Setting And Enforcing Your Boundaries In Public

Status
Not open for further replies.
With all due respect, nowhere did I read the OP was specifying his advice applied strictly to gas stations.
I might have misread the OP but I thought the example he gave was while pumping gas.

I will say again, that while Givens doesn't stress this he does note that most of his examples occurred in parking lots.

This mirrors my experience but my job mostly occurred in parking lots.

You said it first but I don't know too many people who have grown to adulthood without knowing how to politely and appropriately enforce social boundaries.

Which brings up another good point, if I look at you and say "Excuse me sir you're a little close to me could you back up please." And your response is"FU MFKR!!!!" That should be a fairly good indication to you this is not a normal social interaction and that you need to adjust your posture and your response accordingly.

And now, if you all will excuse me I'm busy doing laundry and watching Band of Brothers so I'll see you all later
 
Last edited:
People lose their minds with this topic. It's insane to think that one can magically enforce some subjective bubble around their body and even crazier that people feel the need to absent specific circumstances setting off alarm bells.

I'm approached by people all the time and it's nothing to freak out about. If they get into "my space" I can ask them to step back but if they don't want to then it's on me to walk away. I can't "enforce a thing." If they start screaming in my face and I can articulate violence is imminent then that changes things.

There's this thing called being a man and it involves not freaking out every time another man is within touching distance. Be aware, be capable, be prepared to deal with violence if it comes but you shouldn't expect it from everyone you meet.
 
...in NO place, is a verbal warning illegal
Truue, but starting an argument about proximity alone can oprove dangerous and unwise . It can lead to a conrontation that would not have happened otherwise, and it can weaken a legal defense of self defense, should it come to that.
Beg to differ, but in Arizona....one may use the "Defensive Display" to communicate to another person whom one might reasonably believe is about to engage in violence and uncover a concealed firearm, and warn them "I am armed and I will defend myself" or "I don't want trouble, I am armed and will defend myself" or "Back off, I am armed and will defend myself" (or similar verbiage).
That' a bit off topic, but that is true in a number of justifecaions, but in all of them, it does not come into play until nondeadly physical force is justified.
I brought up Tueller as a comparitive time/distance metric to show that YES, there is a correlation between proximity and danger. Read it again Oh Grand Poobah, and then realize what my message was, not the one you're trying to make it.
You brought it up in the context of "the enforcement of a personal bubble"

We have discussed here many times that for the civilian defender, the best strategy is always to avoid, de-escalate, and evade. To lay claim to a "personal space" does just the opposite.

The sworn officer has a different duty. For a civilian, Old Dog's advice is the best.
It's insane to think that one can magically enforce some subjective bubble around their body and even crazier that people feel the need to absent specific circumstances setting off alarm bells.

I'm approached by people all the time and it's nothing to freak out about. If they get into "my space" I can ask them to step back but if they don't want to then it's on me to walk away. I can't "enforce a thing." If they start screaming in my face and I can articulate violence is imminent then that changes things.

There's this thing called being a man and it involves not freaking out every time another man is within touching distance. Be aware, be capable, be prepared to deal with violence if it comes but you shouldn't expect it from everyone you meet.
You got it!
 
Even a police officer, if he wants to be effective on the job or even keep his job doesn’t treat every person who breaks their bubble as an attacker. I was taught more years ago than I care to admit to step back to create reactive distance and only escalate to a verbal warning if the person steps forward when you step back. Most people will take the non-verbal cue that they are too close and keep their distance. It’s a non-confrontational way to stay ahead of a situation.

Obviously this won’t apply in crowded situations one might find oneself in such as public transportation or a concert or ball game. A different set of rules apply there. If armed you need to be concerned with protecting your weapon, if unarmed you need to protect your wallet and other valuables.

I did this so much on the job I do it automatically in retirement. If you go through life looking for trouble you will eventually find someone who will oblige you. Learn to read people, profile them. Let their body language guide your response.
 
I might have misread the OP but I thought the example he gave was while pumping gas.

I will say again, that while Givens doesn't stress this he does note that most of his examples occurred in parking lots.

This mirrors my experience but my job mostly occurred in parking lots.

You said it first but I don't know too many people who have grown to adulthood without knowing how to politely and appropriately enforce social boundaries.

Which brings up another good point, if I look at you and say "Excuse me sir you're a little close to me could you back up please." And your response is"FU MFKR!!!!" That should be a fairly good indication to you this is not a normal social interaction and that you need to adjust your posture and your response accordingly.

And now, if you all will excuse me I'm busy doing laundry and watching Band of Brothers so I'll see you all later
Yes, the example was, SPECIFICALLY, a behavior and awareness fail I witnessed while at Speedway while pumping gas. Old Dog is using some creative interpretation to decide what I meant. I see a lot of that on here. You were, however, 100% correct Night Rider.
 
Even a police officer, if he wants to be effective on the job or even keep his job doesn’t treat every person who breaks their bubble as an attacker. I was taught more years ago than I care to admit to step back to create reactive distance and only escalate to a verbal warning if the person steps forward when you step back. Most people will take the non-verbal cue that they are too close and keep their distance. It’s a non-confrontational way to stay ahead of a situation.

Obviously this won’t apply in crowded situations one might find oneself in such as public transportation or a concert or ball game. A different set of rules apply there. If armed you need to be concerned with protecting your weapon, if unarmed you need to protect your wallet and other valuables.

I did this so much on the job I do it automatically in retirement. If you go through life looking for trouble you will eventually find someone who will oblige you. Learn to read people, profile them. Let their body language guide your response.

Exactly. I've found that simply saying words to the effect of "whoa, personal space buddy" in a non aggressive personable tone of voice while holding my palm out toward them works wonders for people to get the hint. If they don't get the hint it's usually because there are other aggressive indicators going on and that will be dealt with as appropriate.

As a cop you learn the number one way to avoid fighting isn't a death stare or authoritative voice. It's simply being calm and respectful while being clear about what you want.
 
I do look at my surroundings; armed or not. I interact with strangers as minimally as possible, except bartenders, wait staff, and cashiers. Regardless, some folks will approach and I will shake my head. I am not aware of any special stink-eye or FAFO look. The head shake is usually all that is required. That's usually the extent of it. Very, very few try to push it with me, even in this famous tourist magnet in the desert. I am convinced that after 70+ yrs of life, that looking for that special something by that special someone who might invade my personal space and thus, trigger some special behavior on my part is just the equivalent to looking for trouble. You know what is said about looking for trouble.
 
Though invading the personal space of another ON ITS OWN is not a specific crime, it is recognized that the Ability, Opportunity, and Jeopardy components of an assaultive act increase as proximity increases.
Whether driving on a rural freeway, pumping gas, walking on a sidewalk in Portland, or riding a busy subway car in New York City, the same AOJ assessments apply. Ability and Opportunity determinations can be clear-cut and kind of mechanical (e.g. "the 21-foot rule" or "I saw a box-cutter in his hand").

Jeopardy not so much.

Jeopardy, of course, can also be described as "manifest intent".

Close proximity in a busy subway car is an accepted, normal fact of life. Not by itself a manifestation of evil intent.

But attempting to approach to within arms-reach of a person pumping self-service gas is NOT normal behavior. When combined with a predator stare, a forward lean, clenched fists, a quick sideways glance, or other actions it may be a dependable indicator of evil intent.

Manifest intent can be subtle. It can be ambivalent. It depends on what is "normal" or "has been learned through experience" for those who are involved. Or who serve on juries.

In the face of possible manifest evil intent, it makes sense to clarify things; to see what game is actually afoot if possible. The phrase I use on unknown contacts who get a little too close is: "STOP! I ain't got nuttin' for ya!" with my non-dominant hand raised traffic-cop-style. This is a lot like what the OP describes. It forces the unknown contact to reveal something about his game. If he retreats (out of my bubble, to use the OP's term), life is good. If he continues to advance, the likelihood that he has evil intent increases greatly.

And the mechanical Opportunity and Ability assessments shift into high gear.


Let's not let the OP's language and strong opinions cloud our understanding of his applications of AOJ. Not everyone around us is nice. The law does not require us to behave nicely. Or politely.

my recourse is limited to a polite request and to moving away.
 
Last edited:
The tricky criminals in crowded public spaces are those who can operate without clearly manifesting evil intent. Observing (or hiding) intent depends on the skills of both the criminal, AND the observer.

For example, the main Mexico City bus terminal is a hive of theft. Pickpockets abound. Thieves use sharp knives to slit open the bottoms of women's purses to extract the contents. Normal behavior in that environment is for men to NOT carry anything in their pockets. Moneybelts are common. Women don't carry handbags and hide their cash and cards in their bras.

I suspect that there are places in US cities that have similar problems.

In those places, evil intent is assumed. Unless, I suppose, you're an oblivious gringo tourist.

In the OP's example, "Old Fart" did not see "crackhead's" manifest intent. But the OP did. As a parable encouraging us all to do better here, this story seems valuable.
 
Last edited:
Yes, the example was, SPECIFICALLY, a behavior and awareness fail I witnessed while at Speedway while pumping gas. Old Dog is using some creative interpretation to decide what I meant. I see a lot of that on here.
Oh, pardonez moi, s'il vous plais. Apparently, I indulged in "creative interpretation" and made the mistake of assuming that in your thread titled "Setting and enforcing your boundaries in public" you were attempting to provide a public service and offer forth advice which had application beyond simply setting and enforcing your boundaries while pumping gas at Speedway. I shall not do that again, ever!

Even a police officer, if he wants to be effective on the job or even keep his job doesn’t treat every person who breaks their bubble as an attacker. I was taught more years ago than I care to admit to step back to create reactive distance and only escalate to a verbal warning if the person steps forward when you step back.
As a cop you learn the number one way to avoid fighting isn't a death stare or authoritative voice. It's simply being calm and respectful while being clear about what you want.
My experience as well. And yep, if one always responds with a harsh tone, stern warning, whatever, in a loud "cop voice," one may be that guy who's actually escalating an otherwise routine social situation. Of course, it took me quite a few years to "get this." Some never do.
 
Last edited:
The original post says a lot about situational awareness.

As far as someone getting too close to you somewhere you have room- not a bus or train, but someplace like a gas station in the OP- you might consider walking away. I've walked around my car to get away from people before. It's fine for a cop to faceplant somebody for tapping him on the shoulder- he has a job to do and he can't just leave. That's a misdemeanor assault for the rest of us. We can just walk away.

As a cop you learn the number one way to avoid fighting isn't a death stare or authoritative voice. It's simply being calm and respectful while being clear about what you want.

When I was younger I had a few cops come out of the gate with an aggressive tone. Maybe they were trying to get my attention? It never helped. There's a lot to be said for calm and respectful.
 
Mmm. I am employed at our local Stop N’ Rob… we’ve one particular local woman who has a lifetime ban from our property, no questions asked. Loitering, panhandling, theft, assault, list goes on. For whatever unfathomable reason, she always gets her transportation to drop her… guess where ? At our fueling station. It’s to the point now that we simply call county dispatch and they send a deputy out.

She has been known to draw blades on individuals, and panhandle for both money and transport, as well as sell… other services to less discerning patrons. We run her off at times if she’s particularly bothersome- she’s no trouble towards us- she knows we’re all armed to the teeth and will not hesitate if necessary… but she preys on unsuspecting tourists and travelers. She’s been run over, shot, carried away and dropped off; only to come wandering back like some stray mongrel.



Whole point being… you’d be absolutely flabbergasted at the number of people who just… don’t see her as a threat; even with her throwing off enough “I’m a tweaker and also naturally psycho !!!” vibes to jump start a mobile meth lab… my supervisor and I were discussing how we would never let her within ten feet of us, but most of these people just… like they’re begging to get robbed and knifed. Ab-so-lutely oblivious as oblivious could get.
 
Personal space: it’s a thing. It varies by person, but everyone has it. Most won’t breach it because it’s considered rude. Those that do? At the least, they’re boorish. Or worse…

I don’t go bat**** crazy when people get too close. I do get hyper vigilant, though. It’s a lot like radar and target threat analysis algorithms. Detect and discriminate. Those falling into “potential target” get extra special attention.

I also go to great lengths to avoid violation of my personal space.
 
On a slightly different topic - I see you say you always pump gas at the furthest pump from the building. I always try to pump gas as close to and in plain view of the front door as possible. The tricksters are always angling at new ways to steal credit card info. I feel like pump furthest out is the one most easily jacked with. I live in a pretty safe yuppie area. I'm not typically worried about being robbed (when I'm close to home), but electronic credit card theft is everywhere.
 
The way I look people don't want to come to close to begin with.
But if some methican decides to be stupid and try anyways. My usual response is to scowl even more and reply "who the hell carries cash anymore".

You don't get old in my line of work by being a 🐱
 
But attempting to approach to within arms-reach of a person pumping self-service gas is NOT normal behavior.
Usually, that is the case. But it may simply result trom someone cutting through to the office while avoiding an incoming auto or avoiding interference with another customer. The risk is very rapid and reasonable response, starting with observation.
When combined with a predator stare, a forward lean, clenched fists, a quick sideways glance, or other actions it may be a dependable indicator of evil intent.
Yes indeed. And the first thing to do is gain some distance.

It could also indicate an EDP. Step one iOS to always avoid confrontation.
 
On a slightly different topic - I see you say you always pump gas at the furthest pump from the building. I always try to pump gas as close to and in plain view of the front door as possible.
There's a Shell station a block from my house, that's where I usually get gas.

I'm familiar with the station, I'm familiar with what's normal for that location and I'm familiar with the neighborhood crackheads that wander through their parking lot.

Like the OP, I generally park on the outside island in such a way that I have a straight shot out of the parking lot.

It's too easy to get blocked in on the inside Island. I also have a better view of what's going on around me and if something happens all I have to do is get in my car and drive straight out of the parking lot.
 
There's a Shell station a block from my house, that's where I usually get gas.

I'm familiar with the station, I'm familiar with what's normal for that location and I'm familiar with the neighborhood crackheads that wander through their parking lot.

Like the OP, I generally park on the outside island in such a way that I have a straight shot out of the parking lot.

It's too easy to get blocked in on the inside Island. I also have a better view of what's going on around me and if something happens all I have to do is get in my car and drive straight out of the parking lot.
Makes sense. Sorry you have to regularly navigate a horde of zombie crackheads. If I have to go downtown amongst the shanty towns, the rules of operation change.
 
Our county is patrolled mostly by Sheriff's deputies. These folks spend their first seven (I think) years in correctional facilities, bossing the inmates around. In my paramedic days, when I worked alongside law enforcement on a regular basis, it became easy to tell which ones had just come out of that duty: they were the ones who treated everyone like an inmate, and it often resulted in drama where drama wasn't necessary. Essentially, it was up to the citizen to de-escalate, and I saw more than one end up on the ground when he took offense.

Meanwhile, the older deputies had learned to deal with their fellow citizens as fellow citizens, which worked far better in general.

Which is a long-winded way of saying that I agree with the OP as far as situational awareness goes, but that I'm not sure barking orders at anyone who comes within six or nine feet is a safe or effective strategy.
 
Our county is patrolled mostly by Sheriff's deputies. These folks spend their first seven (I think) years in correctional facilities, bossing the inmates around. In my paramedic days, when I worked alongside law enforcement on a regular basis, it became easy to tell which ones had just come out of that duty: they were the ones who treated everyone like an inmate, and it often resulted in drama where drama wasn't necessary. Essentially, it was up to the citizen to de-escalate, and I saw more than one end up on the ground when he took offense.

Meanwhile, the older deputies had learned to deal with their fellow citizens as fellow citizens, which worked far better in general.

Which is a long-winded way of saying that I agree with the OP as far as situational awareness goes, but that I'm not sure barking orders at anyone who comes within six or nine feet is a safe or effective strategy.
Not my experience at all. Corrections officers usually are pretty good at de-escaltion they work in an environment where they are almost always outnumbered. I found that the deputies that worked in the jail before they went into patrol were a lot more effective than rookie deputies without that experience.
 
Not my experience at all. Corrections officers usually are pretty good at de-escaltion they work in an environment where they are almost always outnumbered. I found that the deputies that worked in the jail before they went into patrol were a lot more effective than rookie deputies without that experience.
That sure makes a lot of sense.
 
Folks, perhaps we don't need to over-think or complicate awareness of potential or possible threats within our immediate area whenever we're out in Public.

The circumstances of the particular situations will often define how close people may be to us (Public Transit, standing in line at supermarkets, seated in restaurants and movie theaters, etc). It is what it is, for the reasons it must be. Being paranoid is just adding to the annoyance and/or grief factors that may exist in our lives. ;)

There are those of us who have worked in fields where we were exposed to more potential and possible threats posed by others, and even trained to better recognize such things. There are some assorted training venues that LE and other first responders (and the military) may receive which can be directly beneficial in this regard (i.e. like the Detecting Danger training I attended). Then, there's the 'experiential knowledge' route for folks in such professions.

Where some of the Motoring Public may be at a disadvantage is not having been made aware of how to tell the difference between realistic potential threats, versus just fearing there may be some threat. The ability to differentiate between a reasonable fear, versus just a bare fear. Since much of our laws use the legal principle of the 'reasonable person standard', it may behoove folks who carry firearms as a dedicated weapon to become familiar with the nuances involved.

Paranoid versus Prudent. That's the question, and the trick. ;)
 
Last edited:
Finally, one thing I would never do is intervene in someone else's incident.

If Joe crackhead is trifling with the guy at the next pump over, number one it's none of my business and number two if he's doing that he's not messing with me.

Not my circus. Not my monkeys. Not my problem.
For one thing, we often don't really know what is going on in someone else's incident and might just end up on the wrong side of the conflict. It also reminds me of a proverb:
proxy-image
 
Some years ago, Skip Gochenour presented some lectures on the subject of the ADEE model. Unfortunately, teddytactical.com is no longer active, and the original lecture notes are no longer available.

The gist was that civilian defenders would be prudent to consider ADEE in lieu of A,O, J, P in thinking about the justification of force.

https://www.thehighroad.org/index.p...-in-broad-daylight.429424/page-4#post-5370905

Actually, they are two different things. A, O, J, P relates to a test of one aspect of lawful justification: reasonableness. Rreasonableness is necessary, but not sufficient. The justified defender must not only be reasonable, he may only use fore if the threat is imminent; he may only use force that is proportional to the force threatened; he may be obligated to retreat, if retreat is safely possible; and he must also be innocent, as in, he did not initiate or provoke the confrontation. If any one of those requirements is not met, neither the threat of defensive force nor the use of force is lawful.

ADEE relates to that last point--innocence--in a way, but it is not a legal construct. Rather, it is a strategy aimed at preventing a conflict, or bringing one to a non-violent conclusion.

Setting and "enforcing" boundaries in public is not consistent with ADEE or with lawful self defense.

Maintaining and increasing distance, on the other hand, can prove essential, even when a fight begins..
 
Thankfully, I don't have to move around a "major city" except on rare occasions, and that would be St. Louis. In those instances, I do keep looking around as I don't have a CCP in either MO or IL-ANNOY.
As for "the voice", I learned how to "project" mine when I was in theatrical productions during high school as we didn't have a sound system back then. Unfortunately, it left with a voice that carries better and further than some people liked, including my Mother. She would complain to me that I was "shouting" when all I did was to drop it about half an octave so it carried better.
As I sometimes pointed out to her, when I "shout", the windows rattle. :evil:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top