How is this for rifle stance?

Status
Not open for further replies.
TITAN308 said:
a guy can't use light hearted humor now a days without someone blowing a gasket and crying foul.
We actually welcome humor. Who wants to be taken seriously all the time?

However, I have to say that the thread tittle wasn't very clear, while the picture in the OP and commentary, as a sentence fragment (even combined with the smilie) was confusing at best.

The second picture was much more illustrative, but the cluttered background was a bit deceptive
 
Well, I think you're definitely in the running for largest non-exotic-caliber AR. Then again, the quarter MOA groups you get may be worth it.

John
 
The idea started when I got tired of waiting for the barrel to cool down between group shots. And I was always a fan of the niche area of bench rest competition called the "Railgun" category.

So I wanted to make an internally cooled hybrid of an AR and a railgun.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rail_gun

Aside from their use for testing ammunition or components by ammunition manufacturers (almost always indoors, or in a "tunnel"), rail guns are used in the Unlimited Class of benchrest shooting, almost always outdoors, where the effects of the wind can be considerable. With rifles such as these, some believe that little shooting skill is involved, but this glosses over the use of a rail gun in actual competition.

Rail guns "return to battery." That is, the repetition of the aiming point is assured by mechanical means. Secondly, in a properly built and functioning rail gun, aside from the forces used to aim the rifle, the forces generated in firing the rifle will be consistent from shot to shot.

However, the goal of benchrest competitions is to shoot small groups (see benchrest shooting -- precision). In terms of shooting small groups, mechanically returning the rifle to the same aiming point only removes problems caused by mirage. It is of no aid in dealing with shot deflection caused by wind. Indeed, since the usual practice in dealing with anticipated shot displacement cause by the wind is to "hold off" (i.e., use a different aiming point), some feel that the use of a return-to-battery rifle can be a disadvantage.

On the surface, this appears a valid argument, but based on match reports [IBS, NBRSA], it is not a particularly good one. While "reading the wind" -- anticipating shot deflection caused by varying wind speed and direction -- is the same problem faced by competitors using conventional benchrest rifles, return-to-battery rifles do, in fact, generally place higher than the "bag guns" (rifles shot off sandbags, which have to be consciously aimed for each shot). With any benchrest rifle, there are two techniques generally used to deal with the wind. The first is for the rifleman to shoot only when he considers the wind to be the same as with previous shots. Here, the return to batter rifle can be an advantage. The second is to purposefully change the point of aim, just as one would do with a conventional rifle. Due to time limits, in any given match, both techniques will usually have to be employed.

A second use of return-to-battery rifles is for the testing of components, including barrels, bullets, powder, primers, and the interaction of these and the other components of the rifle. That such testing is both useful and necessary points up that a rifle is a system, and precision shooting perforce involves all components, as well as good shooting techniques. Rail guns remove only two factors, (1) the ability to precisely return a rifle to the same point of aim, and (2) to apply constant forces to the rifle from shot to shot. A proper design and build of the rifle is needed to enjoy (2), and is difficult to achieve.

Railgun1.jpg
 
The idea started when I got tired of waiting for the barrel to cool down between group shots. And I was always a fan of the niche area of bench rest competition called the "Railgun" category.

So I wanted to make an internally cooled hybrid of an AR and a railgun.
So you're updating the design from the Browning M1917A1 on a smaller semi-auto platform
 
The second picture was much more illustrative, but the cluttered background was a bit deceptive
Errr...the second picture doesn't show what he started the thread to show off -- the side-mounted bipod legs that had to be remounted onto scope risers.

I totally understand it now, I think, but the irony is that one pic and a clear description would have told the whole story -- if you want to use this type of bipod leg with a large rectangular monolithic barrel shroud you'll need to space the legs off the shroud a bit.

That's really the whole story. Kinda silly it took so much work to get there.

I don't think there's nearly so much hate as there is just confusion and misunderstanding. Perhaps we can reduce our strife by better communication. Probably as true everywhere as in our little corner of the universe.
 
The hate reference was not to this thread, but all over the internet in general. :evil:

Also, its fun to be a little ambiguous yea? Keeps things from getting stale.

Kind of like how a lot of companies will show a weird angle for a new product with some catchy phrase line with it as a teaser.

Drives people bonkers! (in a good way most of the time)

Let's see, what catch phrase could I attach to that photo...

"I like them wide and open!"

"Big Legs. Big Hole."

Hmmm... ok I'm out of ideas already.
 
Cliff Notes:

- .308 AR platform rifle

- heavy steel chassis

- yet to be fully disclosed internal barrel cooling component

- looks like it operates off a flux capacitor and requires a top speed of 88mph to reach firing capability


Here is a shrunk down hi res photo from 24x36 digital posters we sent out recently for some industry vendors:

Click Here for hi res version.

final2copy.png
 
Also, its fun to be a little ambiguous yea? Keeps things from getting stale.

Well, we're a bunch of stale old fogies here. Think "THR = dry trade journal," not "hip ad campaign."

Keep things simple, clear, and descriptive so we don't have to sort out 27 posts worth of "what are you talking about?"

If the product is worth discussing, it doesn't need the "ambiguous" hook to get people talking. If not, the "hook" just makes folks annoyed and encourages them to negativity.

...

So anyway, very glad to hear the risers solved the problem.
 
That is an impressive list of manufacturers you've got partnered with you on this project. Have they had a lot of input during the process?
 
Why don't you spend $200 and get a form 1, use all of that volume up suppressing something. Be cool to more folks then...
 
There's enough room in that forearm to fit a laser printer and a quarter-ream paper supply. Handy to print out new targets.
 
That is an impressive list of manufacturers you've got partnered with you on this project. Have they had a lot of input during the process?

I wondered if he had permission to use their trade marks, or if he just usurped their logos as he happened to bolt their parts on his gun.
 
Your invention - what does it do?
Check Post 28.

Wow, thread's going downhill fast. Hate to see the negativity.

Again, though, very glad you got the problem worked out! Good job!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top