3-12x or 4-16x...can't decide.

Status
Not open for further replies.
I know many people (particularly those who DON'T own one), consider them to be a 'cheapy' but have you looked at Centerpoints? I'm pretty sure I'll be picking up one of their 4-16X40 illuminated, adjustable paralex objective scopes with the rings for less than $70 in my near future.
 
In my opinion, you'll never regret choosing higher magnification. My personal rule of thumb is 3-9 for .223, and heavier calibers get 4-16 or 6-18. If you can reach out beyond 100 yards, the extra magnification really helps, especially when sighting in. If you can see your bullet holes, it's much easier to zero your rifle. And you can always back off to a lower magnification depending on range.
 
Might be too late, but have you considered a Bushnell Elite 6500 in 2.5-16X50? It would cover all of the bases you want covered.
 
Too wide of magnification range and too much objective diameter...

I've been sorta keeping up with Vortex for a good while...I figured it was time to see what all the fuss is about, and their scopes are about right anyway (size, weight, specs...all of what you want, none of what you don't)

I'd say it will be a fine scope...I'll know in a few weeks when I get home.

I did change my mind on the reticle...I ordered the V-Plex instead of the BDC, their BDC reticle is really thin...thought that may be a problem in low light. Their V-Plex is way thinner than other Duplex reticles but I've always thought Duplex reticles were too thick anyway...I haven't looked through one yet, but I think Vortex may have it just about right for the V-Plex.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top