67,000 legally carry concealed weapons in Arizona

Status
Not open for further replies.

gunsmith

member
Joined
May 8, 2003
Messages
5,906
Location
Reno, Nevada
http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/news/articles/0520gunpermits20.html
0520gunpermits.jpg

Peter Corbett
The Arizona Republic
May. 20, 2004 12:00 AM


Arizonans love their guns.

A century after the six-shooter helped settle the state, about 67,000 gun owners legally carry concealed weapons in Arizona, more per capita than in Texas.

The typical concealed-weapon permit holder is a middle-age White male living in the north Valley. Nearly one in five is female, including 52 pistol-packing women over age 80, according to an Arizona Republic review of concealed-weapon permit data maintained by the Arizona Department of Public Safety.

"I guess they want to learn how the gun operates," said Sgt. Bill Whalen, supervisor of the DPS Concealed Weapon Permit Unit. "It's not like they're taking it to bingo on Friday night."

The Republic reviewed the data to learn who is packing heat, where they live and why they choose to arm themselves with weapons in their ankle holsters and purses.

It turns out that one of every 95 Maricopa County residents holds a carry permit, although in some ZIP codes in the Valley, that ratio is as high as one of every 56 people. High-concentration areas include stretches along Loop 101 from Surprise to Scottsdale and pockets in Tempe and Chandler.

The data also show:


• One of every 82 Arizonans can legally carry a concealed weapon, compared with one of every 92 Texans and one of every 40 Utah residents.


• 99 percent of permit holders are White, including Hispanics.


• More than 13,500 women have permits, 20 percent of the total. Women account for 10 percent of Arizona's 154,043 hunting licenses.


• More than a quarter of the permit holders are 50 to 59 years old.


• In the decade that concealed weapons have been legal, 750 permits were revoked, generally for felony or domestic-violence convictions.

As with other gun issues, there is disagreement on the risks and benefits of concealed weapons. Law enforcement officials say the law has worked in Arizona. Few permit holders have been accused of getting overzealous with their guns and few have helped to thwart crime, police say.

Gun owners get the $50 permits for many reasons: protection, to learn gun safety and legal issues, or simply to make it easier to carry a weapon in their car.


High concentrations


Police and gun instructors cannot easily explain why some areas are thicker with residents carrying hidden weapons.

The Republic's review of 2003 population estimates and ZIP code data shows that the 85382 ZIP code in Peoria has Maricopa County's highest rate of permit holders, one of every 56 residents.

That statistic surprised Bill Sandvig, past commander of the volunteer Maricopa County Sheriff's Posse, which patrols the area's Westbrook Village retirement community.

It is a quiet neighborhood, where the only crime wave has been a series of golf-club thefts from open garages.

"I was talking to some of the posse, and they say there are a lot of single women who might have a gun stashed in the drawer," Sandvig said, adding that the women tend to be inexperienced with guns.

Permit holders must take a 16-hour course on gun handling, safety and legal issues, plus qualify on the gun range.

In the 85382 ZIP code, nearly nine of 10 residents are White and the median household income is $56,916, about 20 percent higher than the Maricopa County figure.

Half of the county's 10 ZIP codes with the highest rate of permit holders have median incomes that exceed the county's median income. That includes the 85254 ZIP code in northeast Phoenix, where the median income is $73,758 and 91 percentof the residents are White.


More income, schooling


Permit holders typically have more education and income than the average citizen, says Mark Hanish, Scottsdale Gun Club sales and marketing director.

They also are willing to take responsibility for their own protection, he said.

Hanish's gun club, which teaches concealed-weapon classes, opened in the Scottsdale Airpark last month.

Residential areas near the shooting range have a high concentration of permit holders. That high concentration was a factor in the high-end gun club's decision to locate there, said Hanish, who previously analyzed the DPS permit data.

Barry Tietler, 60, a Cave Creek gun dealer and instructor, said he has taught about 500 people in his concealed-weapon class over the past decade. Former students include homemakers, clerks, blue-collar workers, teachers, judges and politicians.

Tietler's latest class of 20, seven of them women, did its required target shooting at the Ben Avery Shooting Range this past weekend; 17 students qualified. The class included experienced and novice shooters.

Roger Hick, 57, of Sun City West, said he is an unlikely person to pursue a permit. He considers himself a liberal and forbids his oldest son to even play with toy guns.

Now he wants to learn to handle a weapon to protect himself and his wife when they move to land they bought in New Mexico 30 miles from Taos.

"I'm not hiding in a cave with my gun," said Hick, a General Electric manager for 26 years. "I just want to know how to use it."

Randy Ripps, 46, of Scottsdale, is the more traditional person one might expect to pursue a such a permit.

He grew up around guns in Pennsylvania and took hunter-safety classes as a boy. An information technology manager for American Express, Ripps said he wants the permit so he can legally carry a handgun when he goes hiking or camping.

"I don't think I would feel comfortable carrying (a concealed weapon) all the time," Ripps said.

Rosemary Oblinger, 52, of Phoenix, said she took Tietler's class to become more comfortable and confident in handling and cleaning her revolver. She had enjoyed target shooting but knew little about guns.

Oblinger, who is semiretired, said she may carry a concealed gun while riding an all-terrain vehicle alone or hiking with her girlfriends near her home.

DPS gun permit supervisor Whalen said it is not uncommon for people to take the permit class even if they want to keep a gun only in their home.

Permit holders are currently restricted from carrying their weapons in bars and restaurants with bars.

That would change under a bill under consideration in the Arizona Legislature.

A Senate vote is pending.

Arizona law enforcement officials and bar industry lobbyists oppose that legislation.
 
Few permit holders have been accused of getting overzealous with their guns and few have helped to thwart crime, police say.

I have little problem believing the first part, but don't quite accept the latter part. If perhaps they mean that few permit holders have jumped into the middle of crimes in progress, then perhaps as at the very least I do not have data to refute or verify that claim. But if they mean that the deterrence factor is nominal, then I disagree with THAT.

An average of 75 permits revoked a year ain't too terribly shabby......what happened to the dire predictions of a return to the old Wild West?!?!? And to think that none of us thought of the children!!!!

:rolleyes:
 
I read this article this morning. All-in-all, I thought it was fairly presented, especially from the AZ Republic. The 'money line', IMO, comes at the end of the story...the proposed change to our CCW laws to allow carriage inside restaurants that serve alcohol. In spite of the (grudgingly) acknowledged failure of the predictions of CCW-inspired road-rage, blood-in-the-street scenarios, the anti's are still ambivalent about CCW anywhere. I am not so certain our Janet-Reno-Minnie-Me governor will sign it, but I could be wrong.
 
......what happened to the dire predictions of a return to the old Wild West?!?!?

This is just an observation, but I think Arizona, right next door, has a more sensible population that here in California. CCW requires a certain level maturity that is glaringly lacking here. I would not want most of the fruitcakes here packing :uhoh:
 
I totally agree with Siegfried_Geringer. If you stop a crime before it happens then you are thwarting crime. I am certain that I deterred a criminal act one evening when I was coming home from a walk. It was a hot summer night and I was returning home at about 10 p.m. when this guy started walking towards me from the end of the cul-de-sac. He obviously was not a neighbor and had no business there at that hour, he was coming from a house where the people weren't home at the time. Long story short, he kept walking towards me as I was approaching my home and wouldn't stop even after I asked him to. He changed his mind though after I showed him that I was armed by lifting my T shirt and letting him see my J frame. There is no doubt in my mind that I would have been assaulted or victimized in some way had I not had my concealed weapon with me at the time.
 
"I guess they want to learn how the gun operates," said Sgt. Bill Whalen, supervisor of the DPS Concealed Weapon Permit Unit. "It's not like they're taking it to bingo on Friday night."
I don't see why not. I'd like to see his evidence that just because someone is old, they aren't taking a legally concealed firearm to a place with a large number of weak, old people with a good amount of money.
 
I really wish they'd reduce the age from 21 to 18 for the permit, and drop down the huge training requirements--16 hours plus range time is significant and expensive, and that's one of the reasons why there aren't nearly as many people packing around here compared to what some may expect. Ugh. We had a chance at permitless carry here and blew it.

The aforementioned parting shot about packing in bars and restaurants with bars just reminds me that I'm reading the Repulsive, though. ;-) No mention of how it would be illegal to drink while carrying with the law change, no, no...
 
Benzoate ..... I don't remember the 1992 pop'n being as high as 11.5million .. thought it was nearer 9 mil. Anyways ... that set of figures equates to 3% or so. ... one in thirty three.

As I understand it now .. from a 2000 or 2001 analysis (can't quote source) .. we are up to much more like 6% .... which means approx potentially one in every 17 or so carries. PA is pretty well up there.
 
Bingo

A few years ago 2 young thugs held up a bingo place near SF,I would think a bingo event would be tempting to thugs.
 
in florida its 18 to own and you can buy from a private party, 21 to ccw and/or buy a gun from a shop. i think it should all be dropped to 18. if they can trust me to protect fellow and carry whatever rifles they in the military then i should be able to ccw.
 
In florida it's 18 to own, and you can buy from a private party; 21 to ccw and/or buy a gun from a shop.

And if you're someone like me, 20 years old and have never fired a real handgun before (my experiences are BB guns, pellet guns, and 1 shot from a Lone Eagle in .308) then getting a CCW immediately upon turning 21 is not a realistic possibility. Both parents are antis, so that route's not bloody likely. :fire: :banghead: :mad:

Edit: Emboldened above :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
if they can trust me to protect fellow and carry whatever rifles they in the military then i should be able to ccw.

I agree, but only for young people serving in the military. I think young people tend to mature more rapidly in the military and should be given a certain amount of respect for volunteering to serve. I'm not sure I would say this if there were still a draft.
 
I believe I saw a stat recently that said that there are something like 70,000 permit holders just in the buffalo area in ny...
 
But isn't it federal law that you have to be over 21 to own a handgun?

No. Federal law only prohibits you buying a handgun from an FFL if you're younger than 21. State law in Arizona allows you to purchase handguns and carry then openly as long as you're 18. The same applies for ammo--you can buy it from non-FFLs and own it, but getting it from an FFL is another matter.

Right now I carry openly everywhere, but it's only a few more months to go before I'm 21. I'm still going to carry openly at times for political reasons after I get my government permission slip.
 
And if you're someone like me, 20 years old and have never fired a real gun before (my experiences are BB guns, pellet guns, and 1 shot from a Lone Eagle in .308) then getting a CCW immediately upon turning 21 is not a realistic possibility. Both parents are antis, so that route's not bloody likely

Is it legal in Oklahoma to buy handguns from others in private sales when you're younger than 21? I'd advise that route, and it's definitely what I would have done if my parents hadn't been willing to help me out.
 
The casinos are off limits, being Indian reservation land, and the CCW is NOT valid on tribal lands.
I was class number 10 at J-Mart for my permit, and my wife has renewed hers a few times, as well!:cool:
 
This is just an observation, but I think Arizona, right next door, has a more sensible population that here in California. CCW requires a certain level maturity that is glaringly lacking here. I would not want most of the fruitcakes here packing

"most of the fruitcakes here packing"
:confused:
what are you talking about?
are you calling all californians 'fruitcakes'? I assume you mean that in a general pejoritive sense (meaning nutty, without common sense) and not in the other way. I really doubt on average californians are crazier than any pacific northwestern or northeastern states. Which btw are mostly shall issue. Currently no state in the US is a heinleinian 'armed society', I mean Utah's one in fourty isn't exactly handguns on every hip. If tomorrow the US goverment handed out holsters and 1911's to every person with an odd social security number and said "you must carry this" making society "mostly armed," there definatly would be a 'transition period'. But don't sell californians short.
See the snow in the air? Thats hell freezing over, I've just defended californians on a gun board. :barf:
God I'm so moving to New Hampshire.

atek3 (who's been in california for 4 years too long)
 
Texas lumps anglos and hispanics which group accounts for a bit over 90 percent of the licenses. Texas has a black population of 12-14%- no doubt higher than AZ. The percentage of African American holders has increased from under 3% of total licenses to a bit over 5%. Women account for 19-20% of license holders.

License revocation rates are not high and are probably weighted toward drunk drivers caught carrying- or just plain caught as alcohol related offenses are grounds for revocation.

2001 figures covering major crimes and a list of gun related offenses show 180 convictions of license holders against more than 35,000 convictions among the general population.

There are presently 240,800 active licenses in Texas with the number increasing just about every month. The population of the state seems to be about 20,000,000 but the real numbers are unknown as we have essentially open borders and an entrenched population of undocumented non-citizens.

Statistics indicate that the age of the greatest numbers of license holders was 48 at the beginning and the modal age is now 57- ie: the same group of people but in even greater numbers.

Texans are not allowed to carry in places that make over half of their income from selling alchoholic drinks. Restaurants, liquor stores, etc are legal.
 
And if you're someone like me, 20 years old and have never fired a real handgun before (my experiences are BB guns, pellet guns, and 1 shot from a Lone Eagle in .308) then getting a CCW immediately upon turning 21 is not a realistic possibility. Both parents are antis, so that route's not bloody likely.

You can get a carry permit without a firearm actually bought in most states. I had permits for OR and WA for nearly a year before I got my first handgun.
 

I agree, but only for young people serving in the military. I think young people tend to mature more rapidly in the military and should be given a certain amount of respect for volunteering to serve. I'm not sure I would say this if there were still a draft.


And that would create an "us vs. them" attitude, and would be challenged as blatantly in violation of the equal protection provisions of the 14th amendment.
 
It's an economic thing too. The process is pretty expensive in Texas and we only have about 300 21 year olds with licenses. Most are over 40. New Mexico and one or two others set the minimum age at 25. Seems arbitrary and capricious to me but there doesn't seem to be any constitutional minimal age for full citizenship rights.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top