Thread hijack; I've a couple of the Interarms/Ranger guns, and have been happy with them; the PP platform started life as a .32, and remains much more comfortable in that guise. As regards slide bite, they do have a reputation for that, especially if you have beefy hands, and hold high on the frame. The PPK/s was a workaround for GCA'68, but the longer grip was popular in even in guns made over here.
The Manurhin-made Walthers have an excellent reputation, and sometimes it's possible to find guns marked as Manurhin. Not certain that the East Germans made any Walthers; the factory moved to Ulm, where the Manurhin guns were proofed and finished.
I'd like to find a Turk or Hungarian example in nice shape.
Back to my question; the 1911 seems a more complicated, locked breech pistol, yet they are made in all sorts of places (the Philippines, Brazil, China, Turkey, to name a few), while the blowback PP series was a challenge. The Smith & Walther partnership seemed made in heaven, but Smith struggled with the program.
They did add the big beavertail (despised by the Walther cognoscenti) but I guess it finally ends the slide bite.
BTW, the Iver TP was based on the Walther TPH, which is much like a 3/4 scale PPK, in either .22 or .25; most of the ones seen here are stainless Ranger production, tho' a few German ones slipped in for Law Enforcement, ordered on department letterhead.
The Ivers were all alloy (hence fatter), but kinda neat little guns.
Moon