Achieving accuracy with a Remington 700

Status
Not open for further replies.
Lots of good advice here. The 700 is a great action. If you are going to compete in precision matches, it's going to take some dollars. But for most of us (self included) there are several low-cost things you can do to maximize accuracy in a given rifle.

Rifle itself: Trigger. Remington 700 triggers are adjustable and can be tuned. If you plan to use it for hunting, I wouldn't tune it less than 4#, although 3# would be okay. Because it is not difficult to do if one is mechanically inclined, it's the first thing I do on a new Remington. Costs nothing. If you're not inclined to do it yourself, have a competent gunsmith do the work. A more expensive approach would be to replace the trigger with one of the excellent aftermarket units. A good, crisp trigger will really help with shooting accurately. Stock. I'd replace a flimsy plastic stock, even if only with a second-hand factory wood stock. Best option, of course, would be a high quality composite with a bedding block; more money. For best accuracy, I'd bed the action to the stock even if the stock is the original cheap plastic one. It'll give you a more rigid platform. At the same time, make sure the barrel is floated--that is, that the barrel does not touch the forend of the stock anywhere in front of the bedding.

Scope: For accuracy, you need good glass. You don't need more than 10X magnification out to 800 yards; more is nice, but not necessary. And if you buy a high magnification scope, make it very good glass; you don't want a big fuzzy picture. You don't need to buy new. I'd look for a good second hand Leupold Vari-X III in 3.5-10X, or maybe a 4.5-14X, although it will be a bit more expensive. You want click adjustments. There are other options, but I like Leupold's lifetime warranty and their glass is good.

Ammo: I'd buy several boxes of match quality ammo, beginning with Federal Gold Medal in 168 and 175 grain versions. See what your gun is capable with with really good ammo (I assume you know how to shoot for groups from a well-supported position). Shoot a variety of ammo through it until you find a load it really likes. I accuracy test with five-shot groups. Out to 500 yards, anything from 150 grains up will be fine; you'll need 175 grains or better if you want to go beyond 800. Ultimate, of course, is to reload and build a custom load for that particular rifle.

None of these--except quality glass--are very expensive, and will help you get the best accuracy possible out of that particular rifle. It should be possible to get most 700s to shoot sub-MOA without a lot of expense. It takes some experimentation, but that's part of the fun.
 
Any recommendations on a good 'smith to do the barrel work? Most of the smiths around here are big on talk, small on performance with anything that requires slow work or precision.
No, not familiar with any 'smiths in your state. You might contact your state shooting association, then track down someone who runs centerfire rifle matches, then ask him for a referral. That's usually a good thing to do.

Bart, what scopes?
I first used a Unertl 20X, one of those externally adjustable things, but soon learned it hurt accuracy with its front base on the barrel. Someone suggested a Weaver model T, so I got a T20. Served me well but sold it to buy a T16 and T10. Had the T10 bumped up to 16X so I could put a 3 diopter lens on its eyepiece to raise the power to about 25X and shorten the eye relief to about 1.5 inches to use on 22 rimfire prone match rifles as reaching its adjustments were easy with the scope further back. The T16 focuses as close as 20 feet and the T10/16 as close as 30 feet. No fractional diopter lens needed on their front to focus nicely up close like that.

In a conversation with old man John Unertl at the Nationals at Perry, he told me about he and a friend testing all the target scopes for repeatability. They mounted one on a match rifle tested it for accuracy with a 20 shot group, then mounted in on an M1A. After shooting 50 rounds rapid fire with it, that scope was put back on the match rifle and another 20 shot test group fired. Some 15 or more scopes were used made by Leupold, Redfield, Bushnell, Weaver, Tasco, Burris, Simmons, a couple from Europe and others I now forget. One scope stood out above all others shooting the same groups size and adjustment repeatability after being shaken violently whereas all the others' groups opened up from 20 to near 100 percent bigger. The Weaver T20 took that punishment in stride as if nothing had been done to it so it tracked and was as repeatable as before.

John Unertl told me he used a system similar to Weaver's Microtrack in the sniper scopes Unertl made for the US military folks in Viet Nam; great scopes according to those who used them: unertl1095(2)__51702 - Copy.jpg
 
Last edited:
Bart, that's an interesting test and result. But, I assume it was conducted a long time ago. Can one still draw conclusions about current production high end scopes from Unertl's test described in your post?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top