An interesting response from RIA about a 9mm Carbine

Status
Not open for further replies.
As an owner of a 77/44 I can recommend this rifle. I do wish there were higher capacity magazines available for it. That, and that I might want the end of the barrel to be threaded, are about my only reservations about the 77/44.

I consider the 77/44 to be relevant because it is basically the same as the 77/357, with the difference being the chambering. It is definitely a favourite. But I would still like a 9mm bolt action too.
The 77/44 can also be had threaded from the factory just like the 77/357
 
I got a reply from RIA:

“There are already a handful of customers looking for bolt action pistol caliber rifles. This had been forwarded to management for consideration. Hopefully, it will be available in the near future.”

Keep providing them feedback. That’s interesting that the representative noted that there were “already a handful of customers” who also are interested in a pistol caliber rifle. I’ll won’t hold my breath, but at least I’ve done my part.
 
I got a reply from RIA:

“There are already a handful of customers looking for bolt action pistol caliber rifles. This had been forwarded to management for consideration. Hopefully, it will be available in the near future.”

Keep providing them feedback. That’s interesting that the representative noted that there were “already a handful of customers” who also are interested in a pistol caliber rifle. I’ll won’t hold my breath, but at least I’ve done my part.
Something interesting is that while that last part seems to be standard reply, SOMEONE is actually taking time to read our messages (which is kinda cool). None of the replies have been exactly the same.
 
Last edited:
I always was intrigued by the Spanish Destroyer so a compact 16 inch bolt action in 9mm would be fun. Not everything has to be about being the most powerful or fastest. Unfortunately I don't see enough demand for a major company to offer it as a regular model. The Ruger 77/357 - a similar idea - hasn't been a big seller. Maybe if they made a less expensive version based on the American.
 
I always was intrigued by the Spanish Destroyer so a compact 16 inch bolt action in 9mm would be fun. Not everything has to be about being the most powerful or fastest. Unfortunately I don't see enough demand for a major company to offer it as a regular model. The Ruger 77/357 - a similar idea - hasn't been a big seller. Maybe if they made a less expensive version based on the American.

Cost made it easy for me to buy a Marlin 357 instead of the Ruger 77/357 bolt.

If Ruger made offered it in the American rifle and price range, I probably would have bought it instead.

I really like the Marlin but I like the American and the simplicity of bolt action would have sold me alone with the better price and better trigger. The American trigger is really good IMO
 
I agree, cost is probably what makes the pcc77 series a slow seller.

If RIA brought out their rifles in 9mm, I think it would have a major cost factor advantage, and would also allow for the old pistol/rifle same ammo arrangement which 9mm shooters done have right now.

I actually know more than one person who has a few 9mm handguns and no rifles. They often dont want a Hi-point and arnt willing to spend for one of the nicer 9mm semis, or dont want a semi rifle all together. While i doubt all of them would buy a 9mm bolt gun, at least a couple i know for sure would by the tacticool RIA bolt gun in 9mm.

Even at 500 bucks I think the RIAs in 9mm would sell pretty well.
 
I probably wouldn't be too interested in a 9mm bolt, but if RIA brought out a semi auto 9mm, that'd make it hard to resist for me (considering its RIA and as such I assume the price would be very competitive). Especially if they did something like the Citadel 9mm Carbine that is made to look like an M1 and takes Beretta 92 mags.

Make one that takes CZ mags and I can pretty much guarantee I'd buy one! That wouldn't be too outlandish either, as their MAPP line is a CZ clone that takes CZ-75 mags.
 
Cost made it easy for me to buy a Marlin 357 instead of the Ruger 77/357 bolt.

If Ruger made offered it in the American rifle and price range, I probably would have bought it instead.

I really like the Marlin but I like the American and the simplicity of bolt action would have sold me alone with the better price and better trigger. The American trigger is really good IMO

For me, the appeal of a 9mm or .45 bolt action would be the ability to suppress it and have a very quiet and cheap-to-shoot gun (compared to .300 BLK and other rifle calibers). I doubt .357 appeals to too many suppressor enthusiasts in a bolt gun because you defeat the purpose of having a magnum if you want a quiet gun and download to subsonic velocities. Plus, .357 is also offered in lever guns.
 
The action does not seem to strong, really like a bigger 22lr action. Think the bolt handle is the only lug, so magnums probably won't happen. Or 9mm or 45 acp it's just fine.
 
For me, the appeal of a 9mm or .45 bolt action would be the ability to suppress it and have a very quiet and cheap-to-shoot gun (compared to .300 BLK and other rifle calibers). I doubt .357 appeals to too many suppressor enthusiasts in a bolt gun because you defeat the purpose of having a magnum if you want a quiet gun and download to subsonic velocities. Plus, .357 is also offered in lever guns.

Psst. .38 Special.

:)
 
Haha! Good point. I’m still turned off because in a detachable magazine configuration, I suspect the user would have to be mindful of rimlock though.

Preventing rimlock might be one reason Ruger's 77/357 has a rotary magazine, which is basically an oversized 10/22 rotary magazine.

My biggest problem with detachable magazines is the added cost. I can never be satisfied with just one detachable magazine. It seems I need at least 3 in a bolt gun, and 5 would make me happier. Depending on the magazine, that can be a lot of extra money.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top