Braced Pistol stamp Watch Thread

So couple more questions for those that know.

Started filling out the form on silencer shop.
Was thinking since I have a trust for my silencer, I could just add the 3 pistols to that trust. Their form wants verified proof of ownership prior to Jan 2023.

Wondering what proof I needed I called and talked to one of the reps. According to them, although I the individual owned said pistols prior to Jan, since they were not listed in my trust I can not add them to the trust unless I pay the 200 tax.
He made it seem like the only option I have to file all 3 as an individual.

Does that sound right?

Can I do what SS calls a single shot trust for these guns? I forgot to ask that question.

Last question.
Can I own multiple uppers for each lower?
Are is owning multiple uppers intent on making unregistered SBRs?

Thanks
 
So couple more questions for those that know.

Started filling out the form on silencer shop.
Was thinking since I have a trust for my silencer, I could just add the 3 pistols to that trust. Their form wants verified proof of ownership prior to Jan 2023.

Wondering what proof I needed I called and talked to one of the reps. According to them, although I the individual owned said pistols prior to Jan, since they were not listed in my trust I can not add them to the trust unless I pay the 200 tax.
He made it seem like the only option I have to file all 3 as an individual.

Does that sound right?

Can I do what SS calls a single shot trust for these guns? I forgot to ask that question.

Last question.
Can I own multiple uppers for each lower?
Are is owning multiple uppers intent on making unregistered SBRs?

Thanks

Silencer Shop was correct. For some strange reason, ATF decided that you could only hold these tax exempt SBRs in a trust if they were already in a trust prior to the publication of the final rule. If you want to avoid the $200, you have to register them as an individual.
 
Received second and final approval today. Submitted 3/29, approved 5/8. It took 27 business days, 39 days including weekends. Free tax stamp through SilencerShop. I had different examiners both times.
 
Last edited:
I officially hit day 90, and still counting on two of the three. Submitted 2/8 (self e-file). At this rate, my paper form 4 will come back before these do. The tin-foil side of me wonders if they are waiting till after the end of the month, come up with some BS reason not to approve then say sorry, open registration is closed.
 
I officially hit day 90, and still counting on two of the three. Submitted 2/8 (self e-file). At this rate, my paper from 4 will come back before these do. The tin-foil side of me wonders if they are waiting till after the end of the month, come up with some BS reason not to approve then say sorry, open registration is closed.
Oh great…something else to worry about!
 
I officially hit day 90, and still counting on two of the three. Submitted 2/8 (self e-file). At this rate, my paper form 4 will come back before these do. The tin-foil side of me wonders if they are waiting till after the end of the month, come up with some BS reason not to approve then say sorry, open registration is closed.

Mine was submitted 2/12, it makes me wonder if that examiner is on vacation.
 
submitted two under the brace ruling ( one is a 5.56mm and another in 9mm) on Feb 6th 2023 within minutes of each other.
The 9mm was approved on May 5th 2023 08:49hrs (88 days). Still waiting on the 5.56mm ( @ 93 days and counting)
 
Last edited:
I think all of us that are counting 90+ days have the same examiner.

you might be very well right....
I tried to read whom the examiner's name on my form to no avail so we as a group could maybe explore that theory . So I cant honestly say whom signed my approval.

But looking over the form and the method that they (ATF) has filled out the forms. Caused my retired Military mind to engage in gear leaving me with a couple of suspicions and thoughts on why they filled out the forms in the manner in which they did.
"APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS - SEE CONDITIONS ON THE LAST PAGE OF PDF" then scrolling to the last page to read the conditions. "Pursuant to ATF Final Rule 2021R-08F."
Now taking those two into account and that very last verbiage on the last page, I am left with the following thoughts that the following apply.
1. It is a blanket statement to explain to any agent why no tax was collected, and no stamp affixed by the Attorney general's order allowing a tax free registration.
2. It also will explain why NO makers mark will be required versus a tax paid form 1 which will normally be required to be marked.
3. If the Applicant desires at a latter date to remove the affected Firearm from a title 2 (NFA) to a title 1 (non-NFA) status they may return it to a true pistol format excluding a pistol brace, if desired. Thus preventing confusion of the prohibition of rifle to pistol, as the affected firearm was only determined to be a SBR (with a brace) on the date of the final rule. But prior was classified as a pistol and as such should allow it to be returned to it's original state minus any brace.

Now all that is just a thought that really doesn't require more conversation unless of course something in my thought/opinions are incorrect. While my post is a drift in the thread, the intent was not to cause any further drift.
 
you might be very well right....
I tried to read whom the examiner's name on my form to no avail so we as a group could maybe explore that theory . So I cant honestly say whom signed my approval.

But looking over the form and the method that they (ATF) has filled out the forms. Caused my retired Military mind to engage in gear leaving me with a couple of suspicions and thoughts on why they filled out the forms in the manner in which they did....

Yours is a coherent, and well reasoned, post. Too bad you don't work for the ATF.
 
So couple more questions for those that know.

Started filling out the form on silencer shop.
Was thinking since I have a trust for my silencer, I could just add the 3 pistols to that trust. Their form wants verified proof of ownership prior to Jan 2023.

Wondering what proof I needed I called and talked to one of the reps. According to them, although I the individual owned said pistols prior to Jan, since they were not listed in my trust I can not add them to the trust unless I pay the 200 tax.
He made it seem like the only option I have to file all 3 as an individual. .........

ATF Answer is here
https://www.atf.gov/firearms/qa/can-i-register-my-firearm-“stabilizing-brace”-my-trust
or here:
https://www.atf.gov/qa-category/final-rule-2021r-08f

Seems some Lawyer decided to address this here is his response:
https://johnpierceesq.com/documenting-assignment-of-your-arm-brace-pistol-to-your-trust/

another source :
https://altmanassociates.net/legislative-alert-transferring-certain-firearms-into-your-gun-trust/


MY thoughts is that really only a listing (attachment or Annex) Trust showing the date the pistol with serial number etc was assigned to the trust prior to the date that the attorney General signed the final Rule. I would suspect that the annex with a notary seal prior to the date of the final rule would be the best option. How ever I DO NOT KNOW if that assignment must be notarized or just annotated and dated for approval.

But the fact that you are bringingthis up this late in the game. Makes me Pretty sure that that your's was not assigned to your trust prior to signing of the final rule.
 
Last edited:
But the fact that you are bringingthis up this late in the game. Makes me Pretty sure that that your's was not assigned to your trust prior to signing of the final rule.

Yep correct, not in the trust. And I believe thousands or maybe even millions of pistols were not put into a trust prior to the rule.

Why would you put a perfectly legal item into a trust?

Personally, I believe it wasn't an oversight but done purposely.
 
.....3. If the Applicant desires at a latter date to remove the affected Firearm from a title 2 (NFA) to a title 1 (non-NFA) status they may return it to a true pistol format excluding a pistol brace, if desired. Thus preventing confusion of the prohibition of rifle to pistol, as the affected firearm was only determined to be a SBR (with a brace) on the date of the final rule. But prior was classified as a pistol and as such should allow it to be returned to it's original state minus any brace.
This isn't due to the rule, its always been that way. An SBR is only an SBR when configured as such.
 
All forms turned in on 3/27

1. Self-manufactured arms were marked as "submitted" instead of "pending research" on 5/3. Still waiting on approval.
2. Commercial arms were returned as "Approved" on 5/10, 5/11. That's 44 or 45 days, if I counted right, and counting weekends.

Hope that's helpful to someone.
 
Received an approval on 12 May 2023 for 1 of 3 eForm1s submitted through Silencer Shop. ATF Official Kirk B. _ynor could b a T.

Submitted 25 March 2023. Two more are pending, all three were entered same (early) morning with a 20 minute average completion time and a 7 digit spread on the control numbers.
 
This isn't due to the rule, its always been that way. An SBR is only an SBR when configured as such.

Tom my point was that on 12th of January 2023 and earlier the Pistol with a Brace was a Pistol. On the 13th January that same pistol without modification of removing the brace became a SBR.
What I was addressing is that the Firearm was A PISTOL originally and IF someone wanted to surrender the approval form and remove it from the registry they should be able return it to a Pistol Less the Brace.
What I pointing at is that IT was A PISTOL first therefore it could return to a pistol. unlike a rifle which cannot be made into a pistol.
Your correct has nothing to do the Rule HAS EVERYTHING to do with it was a PISTOL First.

its no different than those that owned Remington XP-100 and put a stock and a 16" barrel on them. As they started life as a pistol they are legal to convert back to pistol.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top