hoardingthemanual
Member
Did you do the regular Eform 1 or the one with the free tax stamp? I did the regular Eform 1 on 2/12 and it's still processing.
Free tax stamp through SilencerShop
Did you do the regular Eform 1 or the one with the free tax stamp? I did the regular Eform 1 on 2/12 and it's still processing.
So couple more questions for those that know.
Started filling out the form on silencer shop.
Was thinking since I have a trust for my silencer, I could just add the 3 pistols to that trust. Their form wants verified proof of ownership prior to Jan 2023.
Wondering what proof I needed I called and talked to one of the reps. According to them, although I the individual owned said pistols prior to Jan, since they were not listed in my trust I can not add them to the trust unless I pay the 200 tax.
He made it seem like the only option I have to file all 3 as an individual.
Does that sound right?
Can I do what SS calls a single shot trust for these guns? I forgot to ask that question.
Last question.
Can I own multiple uppers for each lower?
Are is owning multiple uppers intent on making unregistered SBRs?
Thanks
Not a problem at all. Once you have your approval, treat it like any other SBR.Thanks.
That's what I thought.
Any idea on having multiple uppers per lower?
Mine took 5 to 6 weeks but I'm a paying customer and it was for a keltech p50.Filed 2 form 1 last night. Now the wait begins again.
My two were also submitted 3/29 through Silencer Shop. Maybe there is light at the end of the tunnel.Received second and final approval today. Submitted 3/29, approved 5/8. It took 27 business days, 39 days including weekends. Free tax stamp through SilencerShop. I had different examiners both times.
Three submitted on 3/25…My two were also submitted 3/29 through Silencer Shop. Maybe there is light at the end of the tunnel.
Oh great…something else to worry about!I officially hit day 90, and still counting on two of the three. Submitted 2/8 (self e-file). At this rate, my paper from 4 will come back before these do. The tin-foil side of me wonders if they are waiting till after the end of the month, come up with some BS reason not to approve then say sorry, open registration is closed.
I officially hit day 90, and still counting on two of the three. Submitted 2/8 (self e-file). At this rate, my paper form 4 will come back before these do. The tin-foil side of me wonders if they are waiting till after the end of the month, come up with some BS reason not to approve then say sorry, open registration is closed.
I think all of us that are counting 90+ days have the same examiner.
you might be very well right....
I tried to read whom the examiner's name on my form to no avail so we as a group could maybe explore that theory . So I cant honestly say whom signed my approval.
But looking over the form and the method that they (ATF) has filled out the forms. Caused my retired Military mind to engage in gear leaving me with a couple of suspicions and thoughts on why they filled out the forms in the manner in which they did....
So couple more questions for those that know.
Started filling out the form on silencer shop.
Was thinking since I have a trust for my silencer, I could just add the 3 pistols to that trust. Their form wants verified proof of ownership prior to Jan 2023.
Wondering what proof I needed I called and talked to one of the reps. According to them, although I the individual owned said pistols prior to Jan, since they were not listed in my trust I can not add them to the trust unless I pay the 200 tax.
He made it seem like the only option I have to file all 3 as an individual. .........
But the fact that you are bringingthis up this late in the game. Makes me Pretty sure that that your's was not assigned to your trust prior to signing of the final rule.
This isn't due to the rule, its always been that way. An SBR is only an SBR when configured as such......3. If the Applicant desires at a latter date to remove the affected Firearm from a title 2 (NFA) to a title 1 (non-NFA) status they may return it to a true pistol format excluding a pistol brace, if desired. Thus preventing confusion of the prohibition of rifle to pistol, as the affected firearm was only determined to be a SBR (with a brace) on the date of the final rule. But prior was classified as a pistol and as such should allow it to be returned to it's original state minus any brace.
This isn't due to the rule, its always been that way. An SBR is only an SBR when configured as such.