22-rimfire
Member
Watching Outdoor Channel this morning. I didn't see the entire episode as I was working. But here is the deal.... hunter was using a compound bow for grizzly, in Alaska I assume.... that suggests very close range to be effective. They sight a bear and stalk it. Bear charges toward hunters and guide shoots it with his rifle.
Now, I'm all for hunting with a compound bow, but this program left me with a distastful taste in my mouth. I know bears can charge and they are unpredictable, but I think the hunter should NOT have gone out with only the bow. What are your thoughts?
It is easy to be an armchair quarterback and make comments after the fact, but I probably would not have aired that show in the first place. When I hunted with a bow, it might well have been the ultimate challenge to do this hunt.... but should you?
Now, I'm all for hunting with a compound bow, but this program left me with a distastful taste in my mouth. I know bears can charge and they are unpredictable, but I think the hunter should NOT have gone out with only the bow. What are your thoughts?
It is easy to be an armchair quarterback and make comments after the fact, but I probably would not have aired that show in the first place. When I hunted with a bow, it might well have been the ultimate challenge to do this hunt.... but should you?
Last edited: