We Do Have Complications
I’ll take issue here with how matters currently stand. There is presently a problem or complication with carrying a piece of paper, versus a badge of some form. The problem is that in the event one is in a “fight-or-die” situation and is forced to draw and fire, he or she is at a very definite risk of being errantly shot and killed by other CCW holders, and/or by either on-duty or off-duty police officers. Nobody can seriously take issue with this fact, yet, nearly 100% of the people posting in this thread are jumping in and screaming that there is no need for a badge.
Here is one fact from my Tactical Shooting and Advanced Tactical Shooting courses that people had better understand…if you are ever forced to draw and fire, you WILL NOT hear the cop to your right order you to, “Drop the gun!” You WILL experience tunnel-vision and your brain will fart! Then, you will be shot and die. We have a complication! Many police do not even remember firing after the event. Many police cannot recall how many rounds they fired. That is how severe the problem is. Rather than mock these people who appear to be seeking resolution to the problem, perhaps we should proactively seek a solution. Do I have a badge? No, never have. Do I think there is merit for one? Yes.
How do we identify police as police? Meaning they have the legal permission to bear that pistol? Right…the badge. Either we should not offer CCWs, or we should issue them as a badge, not as a piece of paper that looks like the local library card. Now, if the issue is that people will present themselves as being police officers, that fact is simple to solve…rather than issue a simple CCW, deputize the CCW applicants as “reserve officers”. Such an act should be nation-wide for safety safe of our country.
Laugh if you will, but at least instead of just offering up some absurd quip, I have identified a real-life problem, and a possible resolution that merits discussion. Now, explain how such a process would not work?
Doc2005.