ArfinGreebly
Moderator Emeritus
Okay, it's late, and I should have turned in hours ago.
*Yawn*
Mind does funny things when you keep it lit up for too long. For instance:
You've all heard the old saw about people having dogs that resemble the owner. (Cue bunch o' pics of odd looking owner/dog combos.)
Well, I've noticed that lately I've leaned toward older designs -- revolvers and lever guns -- even though I have self-loaders with respectable practical rates-of-fire.
I find myself answering "which 3 guns" questions with ".357 S&W, .357 Marlin, .30-30 Marlin" even though I could just as easily answer ".40 XD, .30 Carbine, 5.56 Carbine."
I kind of have a predisposition toward stuff that's inherently reliable in design, where BANG is the predictable result of every trigger-pull.
But then the dog/owner thinking reminds me that I drive a manual (stick) transmission. Always. Every car I've ever owned -- beginning in 1967 -- has been stick shift.
My wife made the switch from stick to auto about 10 years ago, while I insist on driving the stick.
I don't want the car to be smarter than I am. I want it to be in the gear I choose, and I don't want it to argue with me. Further, manual transmissions typically last way longer.
See a reliability theme here?
I don't own a dog, so the manual/auto thing (or lever/auto-loader thing) isn't an issue there. I think if I DID own a dog, it would be a short-bed stick thing, suitable for off-road use.
I seem to be conservative enough (reactionary?) that I like the older "trusty" designs, and this shows both in the guns I choose and the cars I drive.
Freud couldn't make the appointment today, so I'm left speculating on my own.
So, I wonder, sez I, if there are others out there who find themselves driving a Winchester truck, a Glock SUV, a Mossberg Jeep, or whatever.
Is there any consistency in the way you choose cars and the way you choose guns? Guns and dogs?
Gentlemen, start your engines . . .
*Yawn*
Mind does funny things when you keep it lit up for too long. For instance:
You've all heard the old saw about people having dogs that resemble the owner. (Cue bunch o' pics of odd looking owner/dog combos.)
Well, I've noticed that lately I've leaned toward older designs -- revolvers and lever guns -- even though I have self-loaders with respectable practical rates-of-fire.
I find myself answering "which 3 guns" questions with ".357 S&W, .357 Marlin, .30-30 Marlin" even though I could just as easily answer ".40 XD, .30 Carbine, 5.56 Carbine."
I kind of have a predisposition toward stuff that's inherently reliable in design, where BANG is the predictable result of every trigger-pull.
But then the dog/owner thinking reminds me that I drive a manual (stick) transmission. Always. Every car I've ever owned -- beginning in 1967 -- has been stick shift.
My wife made the switch from stick to auto about 10 years ago, while I insist on driving the stick.
I don't want the car to be smarter than I am. I want it to be in the gear I choose, and I don't want it to argue with me. Further, manual transmissions typically last way longer.
See a reliability theme here?
I don't own a dog, so the manual/auto thing (or lever/auto-loader thing) isn't an issue there. I think if I DID own a dog, it would be a short-bed stick thing, suitable for off-road use.
I seem to be conservative enough (reactionary?) that I like the older "trusty" designs, and this shows both in the guns I choose and the cars I drive.
Freud couldn't make the appointment today, so I'm left speculating on my own.
So, I wonder, sez I, if there are others out there who find themselves driving a Winchester truck, a Glock SUV, a Mossberg Jeep, or whatever.
Is there any consistency in the way you choose cars and the way you choose guns? Guns and dogs?
Gentlemen, start your engines . . .