AZRickD:
I can't believe people are not up in arms about the child being talked to by police.
So much to be peeved about. I'll have to buy a vowel.
AZRickD:
I can't believe people are not up in arms about the child being talked to by police.
No I don't I already know that it was in Bath Michigan in 1927The year you ask???
You do realize that this was done by an adult worker at the school over a period of about a year or so and not a student rightToo bad we didn't have ZT then, huh?
Yes there is and it has been pointed out here several timesThere is no evidence that the girl did anything "knowlingly.
Yes you do, you are just refusing to acknowledge the sway it does hold.Additionally, I don't see "the times" as being different, other than what political philosophy is holding sway.
Maybe because the police can talk to a juvenile being charge with a crime, how else are they going to say "You are under arrest" ?I can't believe people are not up in arms about the child being talked to by police.
I know what you meanPeople are more concerned with legalities than with what is "right" or "wrong" Makes me sick to hear about narrow minded thoughtless rule followers.
Why do people keep bringing irrelevant tidbits into this discussion about a girl who knowingly ans willfully broke both state law and school policy this year
knowingly ans willfully
I don't think Doc understands my point, I'm not saying I would bring this young girl up on any formal charges under the conditions but in fairness, students should be well aware of WHY they are not allowed to bring small knives, butter knives, steak knives, Ginzu knives, etc. It's a safety/security issue.
To avoid the issue of other documented incidents where children KILLED other children with knives in the same area, is a bit crass.
I would add that it is the way the schools are being allowed to be runThe core issue here is not so much knives, guns or other weapons, but the way some schools are being run,
Sorry, Doc. Nothing will happen. The school and the PD will claim that the principal gave consent, acting in loco parentis. Ultimately everything will be covered up "to protect the privacy of the student." The best outcome will be for the D.A. (or whoever decides juvenile cases) to refuse to prosecute.
If this kid gets prosecuted, heads will roll. Even if the kid does not get prosecuted, heads should roll. The prosecution may happen, but will never succeed. The first thing the defense should do is have all evidence tossed per illegally obtained.
What is the evidence that this girl, who openly, and on several occasions, used a knife to cut her food in the lunch room without so much as a hiccup from the lunch lady, was aware of this rule?Yes there is and it has been pointed out here several times
So are you goig to go on a "for the children tirade" hereAnd if a few dozen children, per year, per school need to get mangled up in the gears, well... too bad for them.
And what if it rains on the third Friday of the fifth month for ten days and eight nights while the moon is in the seventh house...And if one of these children actually DOES turn dangerous, hold a grudge and goes back to visit the principal in a few years, with an AK.... well... that's too bad, too.
Some children will have their spirit broken some will develop spirit from these rules
They can either work to change these rules or whine about getting in trouble when they get caught breaking them
Then why are you mad at me"If you disagree with the rules, don't break them...seek to change them! I will support you every step of the way!