beeenbag
Member
I don't pull my triggers, I slap them, does that mean I can have a SBR?
I don't pull my triggers, I slap them, does that mean I can have a SBR?
Whoever said the barrel was right. It's not quite a smoothbore though.
There is one problem with that. You cannot stabilize a long projectile with straight rifling. Straight rifling works with round balls the way he describes, long cylinders have different aerodynamic characteristics than spheres (aka the baseball). And un-stabilized long projectile will tumble almost immediately, not in 50 yards, not even 50 feet.
It could be that the patent deals with stabilizing a long object without spinning it, or giving it fins....
In the comments he claims he "knows" and is not theorizing. But I guess we'll seeI agree. Also, the video really isn't clear if he has inside info or is just posting his own thoughts. The video was posted on the 19th, so I'm doubtful.
Gtscotty said:Basically a $2k semi-auto musket with similar accuracy.... I think I'll take a pistol with an arm brace instead.
What a joke! You can build an SBR, pay the $200 tax stamp and still be a long way under the ridiculous asking price for this FA turd. The talk of special ammunition for this paper weight is beyond ridiculous.
The problem is frequent movement between states.
Frequent movement between states? I wonder how many people need or want to take SBRs across state lines with any sort of regularity? If I were heading to another state and felt that I needed to bring along an AR I'd swap out the upper for something 16" plus. But as you say, a pistol brace negates all of this.
Hasaf said:I realize my case is unusual.