Wording changed to reflect our interests:
When the ATF came for the machine guns,
I remained silent;
I did not own a machine gun.
When they outlawed EBRs,
I remained silent;
I did not own an EBR.
When they came for the 11+ round mags,
I did not speak out;
I did not own "high capacity" mags.
When they came for the "sniper rifles",
I remained silent;
I was not a "sniper rifle" owner.
When they came for me,
there was no one left to speak out
I think some people underestimate the strength of gun owners and figure we will just have to deal with what "they" allow "us" to have. No. They work for us. Stand together and there are untold millions of "us". No matter what some pencil neck in DC tries to outlaw, let them know that we won't stand for it, regardless of whether or not you'd ever want to own one. The anti-gun movement is strong because they all stick together, and they won't stop, ever. The gun owner movement has the ability to be even stronger but only if we stick together. Slice a little off here, then there. Divide and conquer. Fudds think "well I'd certainly never want to own one of those evil black rifles, I can do without them, as long as I can drop a whitetail this fall". The further you let them erode our rights they WILL eventually get to your Model 70 SNIPER RIFLE in 30-06, wood stock, leupold scope, and all. Push back, always.
We are entering a time of "change" which, unfotunately, may mean they'd like to rethink and evaluate the bill of rights, with a bottle of white-out and a ball point pen.