usmarine0352_2005
member
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2005
- Messages
- 2,796
Going with the premise that we "win" Heller and it is ruled that the 2nd Amendment is an individual right we have won big. (strict scrutiny vs. reasonable regulations notwithstanding).
This will make the Anti-gunners pour more effort into what they have recently been trying to do:
1.) Ammo Bans
2.) Ammo taxes or fees to make exorbinantly expensive.
3.) Ammo Serialization
4.) Specific Weapons Ban
5.) Limitations on purchase amounts
6.) Closing the "gun show loophole"
7.) Ban on specific ammo
We could in fact win the battle but lose the war.
What is the point of owning a gun if you can't afford the ammo? Or if you can only purchase guns that serialize the ammo that is fired? Ammo is not Constituationally protected.
By winning Heller we may force the Anti-2nd Amendment crowd to get more creative and in fact more effective.
How can we stop this? Is there anything we can do?
This will make the Anti-gunners pour more effort into what they have recently been trying to do:
1.) Ammo Bans
2.) Ammo taxes or fees to make exorbinantly expensive.
3.) Ammo Serialization
4.) Specific Weapons Ban
5.) Limitations on purchase amounts
6.) Closing the "gun show loophole"
7.) Ban on specific ammo
We could in fact win the battle but lose the war.
What is the point of owning a gun if you can't afford the ammo? Or if you can only purchase guns that serialize the ammo that is fired? Ammo is not Constituationally protected.
By winning Heller we may force the Anti-2nd Amendment crowd to get more creative and in fact more effective.
How can we stop this? Is there anything we can do?