That is always the preferred solution to an iffy situation, but one has to consider (1) how far it might be to the next rest stop; (2) how long it has been since the dogs were last out, and their endurance; and (3), and this is the most important and the one requiring the most judgment, just how much of a threat two men who happened to drive into the same rest stop at the same time seemed to pose.I would have driven away.
Posted by CA Raider: consider the following possibilities:
1. you do not draw your weapon - you just leave it holstered. but you reveal that you have a weapon .... maybe by opening a shirt or lifting up the bottom of a shirt. you do not threaten anyone, but indicate that if you are attacked you can defend yourself.
Posted by Frank Ettin: This can become a question of why, and under what circumstances, you are displaying your gun.
If you are you displaying your gun to intimidate someone, to assure that someone keeps his distance or leaves, to secure his compliance, etc., your display could well be seen as a threat. And that sure seems to be your most likely purpose in displaying your gun, at least as you've posed the question. Or are you suggesting that you're displaying your holstered gun just so someone can admire the craftsmanship of your fancy grips?
The usual definition of assault, based on the Common Law, is:
Quote:
an intentional act by one person that creates an apprehension in another of an imminent harmful or offensive contact.
In the laws of some States this crime might be given another name. For example, in Alabama it's called "menacing." But by whatever name it is called, it is a crime in every State.
So a display of a firearm or telling someone you have a gun, when done for the purposes of intimidation, is, in all States, an assault of some type. You are effectively putting someone in fear of an imminent harmful or offensive contact, i. e., getting shot.
He didn't, he just chose a safer time to use the "tactical advantage of surprise".Never give up your tactical advantage of surprise.
poolingmyignorance said:While Texas doesn't have an "agreement" Texas honors ALL states CHLs.
Op my 02 as a former police officer you did the right thing. Your safety first their feelings second.Last Monday I was returning to Minnesota from a trip to Texas to pick up two rescue dogs. In Oklahoma,the dogs needed a pit stop so I pulled in to a "No Services" rest area. Long drive in and can't see the area from the road. I noticed a pickup with two guys in it pulled in and parked a fair ways behind me. They just sat and watched me. I had a feeling they weren't there to strech their legs, but just coming out of Texas where my permit from Minnesota is not honored my pistol was locked in the trunk. I slipped my holster on in the car, then got out and took my pistol out of the locked case in the trunk, out of their line of sight. As I holstered my pistol I turned sideways toward them so they could plainly see what I was doing.
I wasn't looking to be confrontational, but as this was out in the middle of nowhere, my thought (right or wrong) was that I was better off letting them know in a way that made no direct threat to them, that I was armed and was in a state of readiness. If they had no bad intentions they would have gotten out and stretched their legs, taken a leak, before I holstered my pistol or anything but sit and stare at my car. Also if they had no bad intentions my holstering my weapon should have been of no concern to them, as I made no moves, or looked directly at them to give them any percieved threat. As soon as they saw this they drove past me and parked on the shoulder halfway down the exit road.
I walked the dogs, keeping them in site the whole time. They never exited the pickup the whole time, they just kept watching me. After I got the dogs back in the car and drove past them they followed me down the highway for several miles before they turned off.
I think that if I hadn't made a point of letting them know that I was armed, things would have gone south for me.
After much more research it appears you are indeed correct. Do you happen to know when this changed? I remember back when I took my class being told that Texas honors all other states CHLs.
It is true that TX does honor permits from some states with which TX does not have reciprocity, it is not true that TX honors all state permits.While Texas doesn't have an "agreement" Texas honors ALL states CHLs.
As ClickClickD'oh points out, you no longer need a permit in TX to carry in your car. It is worth noting that are a few caveats, but the two most critical ones are below....but just coming out of Texas where my permit from Minnesota is not honored my pistol was locked in the trunk.
My thoughts are that if you find yourself in a situation where you feel you need use a gun to extricate yourself, whether that means firing it or showing it, you should get on the phone with 911 immediately. If it does turn bad, you've got a head start on getting help. If it turns out well, your call will go a long way to painting you as the good guy and towards destroying the credibility of anyone who calls in later and claims you threatened them with a gun.I slipped my holster on in the car, then got out and took my pistol out of the locked case in the trunk, out of their line of sight. As I holstered my pistol I turned sideways toward them so they could plainly see what I was doing.
There is some truth to this. There's always some small potential that the persons you hope to intimidate aren't going to be that easily intimidated. Now you've let them know you're armed--if they're not dissuaded, now they'll take your capability to resist into account and that could significantly reduce your chances of prevailing in a subsequent encounter.The first thing I wondered about was why you showed them you were armed at all. The conventional wisdom around here is that it's always better to wait until you're attacked and then play your element-of-surprise card.
If they truly were "bent on criminal activity" then giving them notice that you're armed lets them prepare in such a way as to take the potential for armed resistance by the victim into account. Of course, it's true that in many, but clearly not all, cases that criminals are willing to wait for an unarmed victim.If the two men in the truck were bent on criminal activity, isn't the theory that upon seeing the gun they make plans to shoot the person carrying the gun first so they can then fulfill their criminal intentions?
He didn't, he just chose a safer time to use the "tactical advantage of surprise".
The best time to surprise an attacker is before they've attacked, not after the attack has already begun. Your post almost makes it sound as if it were you in that position you would rather be attacked and then surprise and possibly need to shoot the attacker.
As for me, I hope to go my entire life without needing to surprise an attacker, and without ever having had shot another human being.
But hey, that's just me.