Zundfolge
Member
I'm torn on the Hillary issue.
Certainly I don't want her in the white house (not even on one of the tours) but I don't want her in the Senate either.
IF for some reason she gets in the white house, she'll only be there for 4-8 years ... if she stays in the Senate she could be there for another couple of decades (if she's smart, she'll stay in the Senate ... thats where the long term power is).
So she might be able to do a little bit of damage as President, but I see her being a thorn in our sides for much longer if she stays in the Senate.
If the GOP retains control of the House and Senate, it might work better for us because then they'll have to start acting like REAL REPUBLICANS instead of the RINOs they've been with GW at the helm. If nothing else raw partisan politicking will require them to stick to conservative principals and obstruct Hillary at every turn.
Anyway, Hillary as President will do LESS damage to the country (and RKBA) than McCain or Giuliani.
Certainly I don't want her in the white house (not even on one of the tours) but I don't want her in the Senate either.
IF for some reason she gets in the white house, she'll only be there for 4-8 years ... if she stays in the Senate she could be there for another couple of decades (if she's smart, she'll stay in the Senate ... thats where the long term power is).
So she might be able to do a little bit of damage as President, but I see her being a thorn in our sides for much longer if she stays in the Senate.
If the GOP retains control of the House and Senate, it might work better for us because then they'll have to start acting like REAL REPUBLICANS instead of the RINOs they've been with GW at the helm. If nothing else raw partisan politicking will require them to stick to conservative principals and obstruct Hillary at every turn.
Anyway, Hillary as President will do LESS damage to the country (and RKBA) than McCain or Giuliani.