In the thread I started about the inaccuracies of the FBI's uniform crime index I promised I would start a thread about how inaccurate the Japanese murder statistics may be. In years past, pre internet, I had read somewhere that the Japanese do not include non negligent manslaughter in their murder rates like we do in this country. However, I could not find any info on that even using Google. For that reason I sent off a quick email to Professor Gary Kleck of FSU at Tallahassee Florida asking him if he knew about this. Here is my email and his reply:
_________
Sir
I hope I am not taking up your valuable time. However, I am writing an essay on the reliability of Japanese murder rates. I read sometime long ago in my pre internet days that when the Japanese authorities publish crime statistics for murder that they do not include non-negligent manslaughter the way our FBI does in the UCR.
Can you confirm this for me it it is true?
Thanks
-----------
Dear Mr. _____,
It depends on which sources of Japanese murder data you look. This problem does not apply to the homicide counts compiled via the vital statistics system, which is based on death certificates and follows international rules that say any intentional killing of another person is a homicide (including nonnegligent manslaughters).
Police statistics in Japan are another, far more complicated matter. In some years the real problem is _too many_ crimes counted as murders because the Japanese included attempted murders and conspiracy to murder where no one died. According to David Kopel, who is generally very knowledgeable about crime statistics in foreign nations, Japan does indeed exclude nonnegligent manslaughters, but I cannot independently confirm that.
Thus, if you want to make meaningful comparisons across nations, I recommend that you use the vital statistics-based mortality statistics distributed by the United Nations in their _Demographic Yearbook_. This is published annually (2007 is latest year available), but only some years include mortality breakdowns detailed enough to show separate counts for homicide. I think the 2006 issue is the last one to include detailed death stats\istics. It is available online at <http://unstats.un.org/unsd/demographic/products/dyb/2000_round.htm
______________
I need to do more research into this before I start a new thread. However, what I have found so far is that the Japanese police ignore many murders because there it is not an easy case to solve as there may not be any obvious suspect. ( This from a former Japanese policeman of 30 years experience ). Also, as has been reported in several cases the Japanese police usually or often ( I am not sure how often ) will not report the victims of murder/suicide as murder victims.
I need to find good quality references for the above.
One of the big issues to tackle is whether the source being sited is from the Japanese police or some other source that may be more accurate.
The gist of all this is that if the Japanese murder rate is actually 2 to 3 times higher than is actually reported, as I suspect it probably is, then it would be very hard for gun control advocates to use Japan as proof that gun control laws can reduce or prevent crime. ( Of course there are other reasons that Japan is not a model society for gun control that the rest of us could, or would even want, to emulate )
_________
Sir
I hope I am not taking up your valuable time. However, I am writing an essay on the reliability of Japanese murder rates. I read sometime long ago in my pre internet days that when the Japanese authorities publish crime statistics for murder that they do not include non-negligent manslaughter the way our FBI does in the UCR.
Can you confirm this for me it it is true?
Thanks
-----------
Dear Mr. _____,
It depends on which sources of Japanese murder data you look. This problem does not apply to the homicide counts compiled via the vital statistics system, which is based on death certificates and follows international rules that say any intentional killing of another person is a homicide (including nonnegligent manslaughters).
Police statistics in Japan are another, far more complicated matter. In some years the real problem is _too many_ crimes counted as murders because the Japanese included attempted murders and conspiracy to murder where no one died. According to David Kopel, who is generally very knowledgeable about crime statistics in foreign nations, Japan does indeed exclude nonnegligent manslaughters, but I cannot independently confirm that.
Thus, if you want to make meaningful comparisons across nations, I recommend that you use the vital statistics-based mortality statistics distributed by the United Nations in their _Demographic Yearbook_. This is published annually (2007 is latest year available), but only some years include mortality breakdowns detailed enough to show separate counts for homicide. I think the 2006 issue is the last one to include detailed death stats\istics. It is available online at <http://unstats.un.org/unsd/demographic/products/dyb/2000_round.htm
______________
I need to do more research into this before I start a new thread. However, what I have found so far is that the Japanese police ignore many murders because there it is not an easy case to solve as there may not be any obvious suspect. ( This from a former Japanese policeman of 30 years experience ). Also, as has been reported in several cases the Japanese police usually or often ( I am not sure how often ) will not report the victims of murder/suicide as murder victims.
I need to find good quality references for the above.
One of the big issues to tackle is whether the source being sited is from the Japanese police or some other source that may be more accurate.
The gist of all this is that if the Japanese murder rate is actually 2 to 3 times higher than is actually reported, as I suspect it probably is, then it would be very hard for gun control advocates to use Japan as proof that gun control laws can reduce or prevent crime. ( Of course there are other reasons that Japan is not a model society for gun control that the rest of us could, or would even want, to emulate )