Lake City Ammo plant

Status
Not open for further replies.
You call it a "defacto ban" purely based on the expense. If that's what "too damn expensive for me to afford" is, then there is a de facto ban on Wagu steaks, Rolex watches, Beretta shotguns and giant SUV's.
That's ludicrous.
Comparing the price of machine guns to price of luxury goods is not the same. The government did not create an artificially small market for Rolex watches, like it has for machine guns.
 
Would you agree that plain 'ol capitalism and the law of supply & demand is equally responsible for the price of transferrable machine guns?
Would you accuse the seller of a transferrable machine gun of manipulating the market or taking advantage of mandatory registration in pricing his MG's?
Are those MG owners anti Second Amendment because they are profiting off the market value of their machine guns?
Profiting off the "government manipulation"?
Profiting off "artificial scarcity" whatever that's supposed to mean?

No one forces you to buy anything.
No one demands that a MG owner sell his MG for the price he paid in 1980.
Government regulations have affected the cost of consumer goods since the first excise taxes.

My response to this isn't a Second Amendment discussion, it's one of what words mean.

"Can own" is not the same as "can afford to own". Just because you can't afford a particular firearm, doesn't mean you have a right to set the price. In America the seller gets to choose what price he charges for goods and services. If you can't afford a machine gun, its because you can't afford a machine gun. It is perfectly legal and thousands of Americans do.
No its not plain old capitalism. It is capitalism that has been severely impacted by federal law. It is not the seller's fault that the market is what the government has made it, so of course I do not hold the seller accountable for the price. The government, and the government alone, is at fault for the prices. My solution is not to make sellers sell for 1980 prices. My solution is for the government to get its hands off the free market, and let manufacturers produce machine guns that are legal to sell to the public.

If the government placed a $10,000 tax on all firearms, your argument seems to be that that would be OK. It doesn't stop you from buying a firearm, after all.
 
If the government placed a $10,000 tax on all firearms, your argument seems to be that that would be OK. It doesn't stop you from buying a firearm, after all.
My argument alludes to no such thing.
Is reading what I actually wrote that difficult?:scrutiny:


Again, (seems that I have to repeatedly use that word with you) my comment is about the legality. "Can own" is not the same as "can afford to own".

But go ahead and believe in your defacto ban. You'll be wrong.

 
My argument alludes to no such thing.
Is reading what I actually wrote that difficult?:scrutiny:


Again, (seems that I have to repeatedly use that word with you) my comment is about the legality. "Can own" is not the same as "can afford to own".

But go ahead and believe in your defacto ban. You'll be wrong.
I have understood you could own the whole time. The hurdles that the government has place on ownership is the problem.

If the government did the same thing to other firearms, how would you react?
 
Manufacture and importation was banned.
Was possession banned? No.
Maybe you should stop listening to those that said it "was a ban".
Well, it was as much of a "ban" as they could get through congress at the time...
We all know that's their endgame.
They're just having to take baby steps to get there... so there won't be a repeat of 1776, or 1861.
 
A bud I know worked for DoD and went to Army Ammunition plants to determine compliance to gauging.

Army Ammunition plants are run by Contractors. These are Government Owned, Contractor Operated facilities. The contractors act as though they own the plant, and the Government! However one deal is, to keep the plant and the workers in prime condition, if the plant meets military needs, than the Contractor can operate the plant for its profit. That explains why we have seen new primed LC 5.56 cases for sale. The stuff did come off the LC production lines, but in a time when the Contractor had met all the Government needs first.

The US no longer has the industrial capacity to produce enough ammunition, firearms, equipment to support our military in minor bush wars. During the Infinity Wars in Iraq and Afghanistan the US military contracted with South Korea for small arms ammunition. Today, the US is buying 20mm munitions and artillery from S Korea because the US industrial capacity is insufficient to support the war in Ukraine.

The Greatest Generation remembered their severe shortages in the ramp up in WW2. And that was a time when the US was a manufacturing behemoth. The Greatest Generation built surge capacity ammunition plants for just such problems as we have today. I toured the Lone Star Ammunition plant in the early 1980's, this was a small arms plant built, maintained, to be turned on when surge capacity was needed for a war. All these surge plants were sold off in the Clinton administration to Democratically well connected realtors and plutocrats who made obscene profits picking up Government property for a song. Our leaders off shored our manufacturing capability and our industrial base. So, if LC can not meet military needs, they sure are not going to have excess to sell to civilians.
 
A bud I know worked for DoD and went to Army Ammunition plants to determine compliance to gauging.

Army Ammunition plants are run by Contractors. These are Government Owned, Contractor Operated facilities. The contractors act as though they own the plant, and the Government! However one deal is, to keep the plant and the workers in prime condition, if the plant meets military needs, than the Contractor can operate the plant for its profit. That explains why we have seen new primed LC 5.56 cases for sale. The stuff did come off the LC production lines, but in a time when the Contractor had met all the Government needs first.

The US no longer has the industrial capacity to produce enough ammunition, firearms, equipment to support our military in minor bush wars. During the Infinity Wars in Iraq and Afghanistan the US military contracted with South Korea for small arms ammunition. Today, the US is buying 20mm munitions and artillery from S Korea because the US industrial capacity is insufficient to support the war in Ukraine.

The Greatest Generation remembered their severe shortages in the ramp up in WW2. And that was a time when the US was a manufacturing behemoth. The Greatest Generation built surge capacity ammunition plants for just such problems as we have today. I toured the Lone Star Ammunition plant in the early 1980's, this was a small arms plant built, maintained, to be turned on when surge capacity was needed for a war. All these surge plants were sold off in the Clinton administration to Democratically well connected realtors and plutocrats who made obscene profits picking up Government property for a song. Our leaders off shored our manufacturing capability and our industrial base. So, if LC can not meet military needs, they sure are not going to have excess to sell to civilians.

Don't forget Taiwan.

5.56 NATO ammo manufactured by the 205th, a division of the Department of Defense and Ministry of Defense, was sourced for South Asia.
 
About 4 months ago I saw a lull in the rise in ammo prices and the whole Ukraine thing sorta fell from the news cycles so I felt it was a good time to buy ammo.
That translates to 4K rounds of 9mm, 3K rounds of 223, 1K of .45, 2K of .308 and about 3K of shotgun shells because I shoot trap/skeet often.
I think I'm okay for now!
Edit: Now that I look at my post I'll buy more, <EG>
Just added another 1K of 223 and 2K of 9mm
You must have deep pockets or an awful lot of disposable cash. Using conservative prices, thats over $6k for the amount of ammo you listed
 
I've got guys I shoot with that go through 30-40k rds a year.
Your notion of hoarding is someone else's drop in the bucket.
40k you say a year. That over $10k in ammo cost at a conservative $ amount
Even reloading there's an absorbent amount of cost. Let alone time to reload that much. Must not have to work and do anything else but go shoot 🤣
Sounds exaggerated to me.
 
You must have deep pockets or an awful lot of disposable cash. Using conservative prices, thats over $6k for the amount of ammo you listed
My father taught me not to count other people's pockets. He said you can't spend their money.
What's your point and what does it have to do with the thread? However, in answer to your question God has been great and provided for us in many ways, the least in my opinion is the finance.
 
My father taught me not to count other people's pockets. He said you can't spend their money.
What's your point and what does it have to do with the thread? However, in answer to your question God has been great and provided for us in many ways, the least in my opinion is the finance.
Just making an observation and statement
You do You.
 
40k you say a year. That over $10k in ammo cost at a conservative $ amount
Even reloading there's an absorbent amount of cost. Let alone time to reload that much. Must not have to work and do anything else but go shoot 🤣
Sounds exaggerat

Well boys, the New York Times may have exacerbated things regarding Lake City ammo with this gem:

I guess I qualify as "Others" 🥸
 
40k you say a year. That over $10k in ammo cost at a conservative $ amount
Even reloading there's an absorbent amount of cost. Let alone time to reload that much. Must not have to work and do anything else but go shoot 🤣
Sounds exaggerated to me.
Not for guys serious about competition. Heck, I shoot 10K rounds a year of 9mm alone, and I rarely compete.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top