Lipsey special edition J frame in 38 and 32mag

Ohen Cepel

Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2003
Messages
4,797
Location
Where they tell me to go
Hope this hasn't been posted already.

Looks like a great J frame edition (Ultimate Carry) with a lot of upgrades AND 32mag coming back which I love;
 
On the 327 Mag vs 32 H&R my guess is to keep cost down. Both of these new revolvers are built on the standard 38 Special frame forgings made from the much cheaper 7075 Aluminum rather than the much more expensive Aluminum with Scandium alloying that is used in the 357 Magnum version of the J-Frame. I believe the few 327 Mag J-frames S&W made it the past were built on steel or Scandium frames.
 
On the 327 Mag vs 32 H&R my guess is to keep cost down. Both of these new revolvers are built on the standard 38 Special frame forgings made from the much cheaper 7075 Aluminum rather than the much more expensive Aluminum with Scandium alloying that is used in the 357 Magnum version of the J-Frame. I believe the few 327 Mag J-frames S&W made it the past were built on steel or Scandium frames.
They were steel - got one. The 327 is a ferocious round in a 3 inch steel J. When it goes off, it scares the onlookers. Been there.
 
Good point on the frame material.

Their 632 is a 5 shot 327, so maybe that is why they did it in 32mag. This 32mag seems to be a 6 shot, I think I would rather have the extra round.

I was looking to send a Smith to Gemini for their "pocket protector" package; $500. Gets you porting if that is your thing, but no sight improvements. The Lipsey sights are a real plus to me as, so often, they are just milled into the barrel and your options are limited.

Will watch for how many they make and street price as I would like one. Will likely buy whichever one I can find first as it is a toss up to me between 5 38's or 6 32's. I think I would prefer the 32 but not picky here.

Also, Taurus has their 327 out now which is a 6 shot (and not a bad gun).
 
Last edited:
I’d be interested in the 32 H&R model.

I’d like to compare the operation if the revolver compared to a standard 642 or 442.
 
How hot of a .32 mag round will it take (for how long) is the question for me.
Buffalo Bore has stated their .32 Mag is safe for all non H&R revolvers and have tested it for velocity in a Taurus ultra light, which would be aluminum frame as well. So, I think these can handle Buffalo Bore, which is the hottest .32 Mag ammo on the market and pricey enough I wouldn't be shooting much of it.
 
Buffalo Bore has stated their .32 Mag is safe for all non H&R revolvers and have tested it for velocity in a Taurus ultra light, which would be aluminum frame as well. So, I think these can handle Buffalo Bore, which is the hottest .32 Mag ammo on the market and pricey enough I wouldn't be shooting much of it.
That BB .32 load is some serious stuff. Way more recoil and blast than the Hornady load at the LGS. Set six of those off and you'll lose any desire to see what the .327 magnum is about, at least in a snub. I could see it as a carry load but honestly I wouldn't shoot a lot of them thru an aluminum frame gun myself. Maybe one box a year or something like that.
 
That BB .32 load is some serious stuff. Way more recoil and blast than the Hornady load at the LGS. Set six of those off and you'll lose any desire to see what the .327 magnum is about, at least in a snub. I could see it as a carry load but honestly I wouldn't shoot a lot of them thru an aluminum frame gun myself. Maybe one box a year or something like that.
I do really like the extra weight of the Taurus 327 or the Charter Arm Professional for just such a reason when I am backpacking and have Buffalo bore hard casts loaded. That 22-24oz window really helps.

.327 in the Taurus 327 is ridiculous and I just can't imagine shooting it out of an LCR 327 because of the weight difference. Shooting .410/45 colt out of a bond arms derringer is more comfortable.

Hornady Critical Defense however in this lipsey j-frame with a nice tritium night sight seems like night out on the town carry piece.
 
Back
Top