My Disagreements with the Rabbi

Status
Not open for further replies.
Had an actual strike been made against the Jews prior to their strike? I ask this because of the use of the term "preemptive."

Read it, it's not that long.

And the movie is rumored to be pretty good too.

Haman had it in for the Jews, on account of Mordecai, who showed him no respect. He bribed and hornswagled the emperor Ahasuerus into issuing an unalterable decree that all Jews be killed on a certain day.

After Haman met his just end, the emperor issued a decree allowing the Jews to defend themselves, which they did.

Now in the twelfth month, that is, the month Adar, on the thirteenth day of the same, when the king’s commandment and his decree drew near to be put in execution, in the day that the enemies of the Jews hoped to have power over them, (though it was turned to the contrary, that the Jews had rule over them that hated them; ) 2The Jews gathered themselves together in their cities throughout all the provinces of the king Ahasuerus, to lay hand on such as sought their hurt: and no man could withstand them; for the fear of them fell upon all people. 3And all the rulers of the provinces, and the lieutenants, and the deputies, and officers of the king, helped the Jews; because the fear of Mordecai fell upon them. 4For Mordecai was great in the king’s house, and his fame went out throughout all the provinces: for this man Mordecai waxed greater and greater. 5Thus the Jews smote all their enemies with the stroke of the sword, and slaughter, and destruction, and did what they would unto those that hated them. 6And in Shushan the palace the Jews slew and destroyed five hundred men. 7And Parshandatha, and Dalphon, and Aspatha, 8And Poratha, and Adalia, and Aridatha, 9And Parmashta, and Arisai, and Aridai, and Vajezatha, 10The ten sons of Haman the son of Hammedatha, the enemy of the Jews, slew they; but on the spoil laid they not their hand. 11On that day the number of those that were slain in Shushan the palace was brought before the king.
 
There is also a popular saying which sums up the celebration of the Jewish holidays.

"They tried to kill us. We won. Let's eat."
 
I do not know if this is my place. So please forgive me if I overstep my bounds.

I have read the Old Testament and I have to say that in that book, the Jews are a real no nonsense bunch. If you took them on, you basically signed your death warrant. When they fought the Egyptians they kicked butt across the desert (pick a war, any war), when they fought the Romans, they lost only on logistics, even then they staged a huge rebellion (The Masada) and kept the Romans busy for how long? Even when they were defeated by the Romans they had a secret rebellion going on. It was only when they began to take on a pacifist bent that they started thier long journey as the whipping boy.

How do I look at the Jewish faith today? As a Christian I feel that they need to be strong, we Christians have been too conciliatory as of late and we have been terribly weakened by it (But there is no way I would want to return to the insane fundamentalism of the Middle Ages or Renaissance). While there are many unfortunate things about Israel, I believe that Jews elsewhere need to be as strong as thier Israeli bretheren. The Jewish people have had the crap kicked out of them time and again, how can they let this continue? I know that there are those among the Jewish faith that espouse strength physically as well as spiritually, I think that is the way to go. Do I say the Rabbi is wrong? No, not wrong per se, he has a different take on the world, is all. I would also welcome his opinion in helping me develop my spiritual strength. Just a gentile's take. I offer no offense, just plain words.
 
May I respectfully agree with those who suggest that you continue to try and educate your Rabbi, in a private setting, so as not to put him on the defense in front of the rest of the congregation.

As a conservative, gun-carrying Jew, I too have serious questions as to why so many of my people feel afraid of the one thing that can prevent another holocaust/pogrom. :fire:

BTW, great image Oleg. Thank you!
 
He bribed and hornswagled the emperor Ahasuerus into issuing an unalterable decree that all Jews be killed on a certain day.


The man was in a position of power. He said he was gonna kill them all. I would take him at his word and act to end his ability to follow through on his threat.


I will respond to both these statements together since they are essentially hitting on the same matter.

Both are very reasonable and ethically sound statements -- especially considering the material facts in the cited event.

Making a statement of intent and having the ability to carry out that intent, in my mind, is essentially equated to action. This was not some neo-nazi redirecting his dissatisfaction for how his life turned out onto someone else. This was a man that had the full abilty to carry out his stated intention, and took actions that would insure it was carried out. Sorry if I took us down a tangent road. Clearly, the events at the crux of the discussion with the Rabbi were not an issue of preemption based on a possible future, but rather an aversion of a stated future-- and one that actions had been taken to bring to reality.

So, to get to the point... the manner of the Rabbi's thinking is clearly flawed in my opinion. I've had issues where I disagreed with clergy on matters of principle in the past. There is no easy answer to what you should do. I can say this.... it is very unlikely that you will change his point of view. Debating it with him would be a waste of time and breath. However, leaving the synagogue would be short-sighted. I promise you that his opinions are not shared by all members. Leaving only takes one strong and principled person out of the community. Stick to your guns-- so to speak and let it go. I'd not breech the subject with him again-- UNLESS he expressed those views one-sidedly to the congregation as a part of services. If he did present a slanted view with no countering position, I would make an appointment to speak with him in private regarding this EACH TIME he did. Whether he understood it or not, he would be inviting this appointment. I'd encourage friends who felt the same way to make an appointment as well. These won't change his mind but they'll let him have the opportunity to hear that others may see things very differently.


John
 
Well, ezy, while hunting is proscribed in rabbinic law, I don't see a problem with it. Several Jews in the "Old Testament" (ie Torah) hunted. The critical element was that you make clean shots and that you drained the animal's blood onto the Earth from a clean cut to the animal's neck (jugular or carotid artery). That is simply how hunting is done nowadays. Back then, some of the Caananite peoples would bash in the skulls of their kills, or simply let them bleed out while they watched.

That being said, try to find a kosher animal in America to hunt. Especially in Missouri, besides fowl.

I have noticed a pervasive Liberalism within Reform Judaism. To be honest, I don't understand why there isn't more of an even distribution of political beliefs amongst the Reform, but hey.

Frankly, I made up my mind. My Rabbi, regardless of our differences is a Jew. I can't talk about "remember our heritage, and history," and abandon atleast trying to reason with the man.

Think of our holidays as going through a cycle that tells a story, and explains your presence in world, and what G-d wants you to do . The High Holy Days cleanse you spiritually (Yom Kippur, and Rosh Hashanah), Sukhot, Pesach (Passover), and Shavuot tell you where you come from. And, Chanukkah and Purim in my opinion tell us what we have to do to those that try to kill us.

The Rabbi is right there with me until we get to Chanukkah and Purim. I guess it'll be my job to convince. Time for some prayer.....:uhoh:
 
Last edited:
One thing I've noticed about Unitarianism (I was raised as one) and Reform Judaism that is very frustrating is the way some people within them seem to try to make them liberal politics as religion. That to some within them, liberal religion equals (and must equal) liberal politics, and liberal politics is the way to express liberal religion. It is one of the reasons I left Unitarianism and didn't look very strongly at Reform when I decided to return to my Jewish roots (mom is Jewish). If your rabbi is one of these, you will have a very tough time.

is that hunting is proscribed by Jewish law. The death of any animal must be in the quickest and least painful manner (or so I have read). Hunting may or may not fulfill this requirement, so is forbidden. Regardless of the recent controversy now raging between shooters and hunters, the tradition of hunting is how many of us were introduced to firearms. If that tradition doesn't exist in your culture, guns can be seen as dangerous and frightening. I do believe this trend is changing though (as far as firearms themselves go). We all have a responsibility for our own and our family's safety.
The inability to hunt is probably part of why so few of us are pro gun. Another aspect is that for generations we were forbidden by the governments we lived under to own guns, yet our non-Jewish neighbors could (and often used them against us). So, since most gun people learn it from their parents, there was no gun tradition for us to hand down. Further, for many Jews, some still alive today, others learned from their parents and grandparents, the only personal association they had with guns is of them being used against us. My own great grandmother came over here to live with her sister after a progrom (with guns) in Russia killed the rest of her family and destroyed most of her villiage in the early 20th century. People remember such things, and their children remember hearing of them, and it is human nature to NOT think "gee, if we only had a gun" but rather to think "things would be so much better if they didn't have guns".

Of course, for me it is exactly that history that is one of the things that got me thinking about the defensive use of guns.

The Rabbi asked me to provide some measure of security during services.

I did. One time he asked why I was situated where I was instead of sitting with my family. I replied, "Clear field of fire". He nodded thoughtfully and walked away.

The Cantor ( a great guy) and I were talking about guns. He had been going to an indoor range with another member of the Schul and shooting 22s and 38s. He bought a Model 64 and loves it.

To quote him," Any Jew who, at the start of the Century after the bloodiest Century ever, remains unarmed by choice has learned absolutely nothing".....
Dave, where do you go? I'd love to meet these guys, maybe get a Jewish shooting club going? I know a handful of Orthodox shooters in the Baltimore community.

Well, ezy, while hunting is proscribed in rabbinic law, I don't see a problem with it. Several Jews in the "Old Testament" (ie Torah) hunted. The critical element was that you make clean shots and that you drained the animal's blood onto the Earth from a clean cut to the animal's neck (jugular or carotid artery). That is simply how hunting is done nowadays. Back then, some of the Caananite peoples would bash in the skulls of their kills, or simply let them bleed out while they watched.
I don't want to get too into halacha (Jewish Law) here, but for all practical purposes hunting is pretty much forbidden even D'orisa (from Hashem) even if technically you may be right that it is d'rabbanan. You have to cut a very specific artery just right in order for a kill to be kosher with a blade that is very exacting in its sharpness. Theoretically, it would be possible for a nearly unhumanly good shooter with a bow and an arrow sharpened to very exacting tolerances to do it, and that is how a very small handful of people in history were able to hunt and still be in the bounds of halacha. For just about all people though, this would be impossible (it would take a very lucky shot, and a repeat performance wouldn't be possible).

Now, that is if we were going to eat it ourself. Sport hunting is forbidden due to a prohibition against unnecessary cruelty to animals. However, I know a few Orthodox Jews who hold that one can hunt if the animal is given to a non-Jew to eat (only Jews have to keep kosher), but I know of no one who has taken advantage of this heter (liberal interpretation/ruling).

That being said, try to find a kosher animal in America to hunt
Deer. You can actually buy farm raised and properly schected venison, but it is very expensive. I would guess that Elk and Moose have cleft hooves and chew their cud as well.
 
I would think all temples are against weapons, just my gut feeling. My family knows that I carry everywhere ESPECIALLY in temple, where they have a key code on the door so those that do not like us cant break in as easily, especially while we are in services. At first my relatives made it sound like I was spitting on the torah when I told them why I wasnt taking my suit coat off (shoulder holster) in temple. Then after a few skin head scares around the area, they didnt mind, now they feel more at ease knowing I am armed, I train regularly, and they sit near me. So while you wont change the mindset of the whole congregation immediately, you may influence a few people, who in turn will influence a few people, etc...
 
First of all, your original post should include cheers for Esther and boos for Haman. :)

I thought the moral of the story was to put your faith in God that He will help you to accomplish His purpose, no matter how dangerous that may be. That is, she had to overcome her fear for her own life, both in revealing her Judaism and in daring to come unbidden before the king.

The lesson of arming oneself is there, but it's not the whole point. Your Rabbi is still wrong, of course.
 
mordechaianiliewizc,....

one of the things that I love and admire about Reform Judaism
(and Judaism in general) is it's encouragement of debate and questioning. I happen to agree with you about hunting, and my Jewish friends know that I hunt and carry a firearm, but do not let that stand in the way of warm friendship. Best of luck to you.
 
I have read the Old Testament and I have to say that in that book, the Jews are a real no nonsense bunch. If you took them on, you basically signed your death warrant.

Not always, but getting into that gets way beyond the scope of THR. The Israelite kingdoms spent most of their history under someone's thumb.
 
Oleg Volk said:
I once went to an orthodox synagogue where the rabbi was one of only two anti-gun men. The other man, incidentally, has since acquired a .357 revolver and went to Knob Creek to try NFA goodies.

that's the kind of Jewish conversion I like to hear about. LMAO. :neener:
 
I know how you feel, being Jewish myself, I have had to listen to fellow Jews tell me to forgive our enemys and be better than them. I have heard them say that we are in exile and not to go to Israel until God commands us but yet they tell us we are not citizens of any country but strangers and we have no right to vote or change a country and that we should not murder other people. They are turning us into a bunch of victims. Was this rabbi orthodox? Most of the Anti-Jews seem to be from the reform movement for some reason.

Show your rabbi this

Torah and self defense
http://www.davekopel.com/2A/LawRev/The-Torah-and-Self-defense.pdf

I don't like to call it the "old testament", I refer to it as Tanakh because theres nothing old about it.

Unfortunately it's not just Jews who are out there telling us to stay disarmed, there are many Christian groups who tell us all we need is prayer because a gun supposedly won't "save us" in the end. *Sigh* tell that to Hitler.

Jews don't do guns, we do lawyers".

That's funny, my dad was a HUGE gun collector and so was most of his family, all Orthodox Jews.
 
mordechaianiliewicz,

Just out of curiosity, is there a uniform prohibition on gun ownership or self-defense in Judaism? Does Reform differ on this from Orthodox?

I would like to understand the Jewish perspective on guns better, but only have my former-Protestant and now Catholic frame of reference. In Catholicism there is the official church dogma/doctrine that must be accepted to be a true Catholic (e.g., real presence of Christ in the Eucharist), then there are traditional (small t) practices which are not required but encouraged (e.g., blessing with Holy water), and also teachings by Church leaders (Pope, Bishops, etc.) which are not official dogma but intended to help with spiritual direction and development (e.g., social justice).

Does what the Rabbi says bind you any way in obedience, or is it just his teaching for your consideration? Do other Rabbis agree with him, or more importantly are there Rabbis that specifically support your position?

My sense is that Judaism does not have a central clearinghouse for doctrine but is more about Rabbinical discussion to uncover the truth. Is there an ultimate authority you can refer to? Or at least a equally respected opposing teaching?

Good luck on your endeavor. I think it is very important we square our religious/moral beliefs and teachings (which we may not understand at the time but should try to accept in our heart) with our everyday practices and beliefs such as RKBa and gun ownership.

Please educate me. :) It will help me better interact with Jews on this topic. Thanks!
 
Even if you can't afford (or don't want) an AR-15, a Mosin for everyone big enough to handle one seems like it would get the job done. It mystifies me why synagogues don't have rifle teams and garand clinics the way the local range does.
 
I know some of you here are Jewish, and frankly this is not only for you, but I want everyone's imput. What should I do?
If he is a younger man and shows any signs of mental flexibility, you might get some literature from the JPFO (Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership) and ask him to read it.

However, if (as I suspect) he is not noted for his mental flexibility and acumen, I think the only choice is to find a new temple. And be sure to let him know exactly why you'll not be darkening his doorstep ever again.
 
I have read the Old Testament and I have to say that in that book, the Jews are a real no nonsense bunch. If you took them on, you basically signed your death warrant.

Not always, but getting into that gets way beyond the scope of THR. The Israelite kingdoms spent most of their history under someone's thumb.

I'll conceed that (but it seems that those who chose to oppress the Jews tended to have their come-uppance in relatively short order with two recent examples coming immediately to mind), but I have to say that I find a good part of the mindset of Torah Judaism to be one of a warrior mind. I for one, while not a Jew, have to say that the presence of Jews who are willing to fight for thier rights and freedoms (and lives!) is in fact reassuring to me. I can't help but think the they, like everybody else, deserves to have the opportunity and right to defend themselves. I would be concerned with any person promoting pacifism without a very good back up plan. ;)
 
Now for my thoughts on mordechaianiliewicz's request.

I have had some time to think about this and feel I an formulate an answer worthy of the question.

I feel that you must speak to the Rabbi at least once more. You have to speak with him in regards to what you believe Judaism is about. You have to let him know your take on your role and responsibilities as a Jew. Then you have to hear him out and listen to your heart. If you do feel you must find a new Temple, then let the Rabbi know, and why. I would like to echo the sentiments of our peers on this, please be sure to speak to him in private. If he should choose to speak publicly about this, that is his perogative.

I wish you luck in this.
 
tktm offered:

I am surprised that no one has mentioned Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership. www.JPFO.org
Why not point your Rabbi in that direction.
Or this webpage http://www.jpfo.org/jewsandguncontrol.htm

Thank you, tktm. I am also surprised it took 67 posts for someone to bring that up. Welcome!

-------------
I think Jeff Cooper wrote these two lines of dialogue, but I'm not sure:

"Violence only begets violence."

"I certainly hope so."
-------------

I'd stick with that synagogue, mordechaianiliewicz, for the same reason I registered to vote with the essentially "anti-gun" party.

Work from within. Quietly, inoffensively, but persistently. A word here, a question there, a raised eyebrow at the right time....
 
Just out of curiosity, is there a uniform prohibition on gun ownership or self-defense in Judaism? Does Reform differ on this from Orthodox?
Reform differs from orthodox in many ways, but either way you look at it there is no prohibition anywhere regarding the ownership of firearms. In fact there are sometimes rules that point to the contrary in Jewish law. There is an idea and commandment called Pikuach Nefesh. This is basicly that one can do anything (except for idol worship, illicit sexual relations, and murder) in order to save one's life. That is why in Israel, even among the "Ultra Orthodox" community, guns are carried to services. (Note that services are also had on the Sabbath where special rules apply.) Normally, if there is no "need" for a gun, say within a secure compound, a Jew would be forbidden to carry things such as firearms that create fire on the Sabbath. In most places, due to anti-semetism and or high crime, it would be within Jewish law to carry a gun on the Sabbath or any other day. Other that the Sabbath or special holidays there is not even a question regarding the allowability (new word?) of owning or carrying any sort of weapon. (Also note that Jewish law would require that unless one is in danger of their life, they would be required to follow the law of the land and have a CCP or any other paper work needed to carry)
 
"Jews don't do guns, we do lawyers"

I can think of 6 million reasons why that is not smart!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top