Styx
Member
- Joined
- Dec 11, 2014
- Messages
- 3,316
Well antigunners have been leaving NY, CA, DC, MD, etc to flip other states purple or blue. If the several millions of gun owners living in the aforementioned states moved to purple states like VA, AZ, PA, etc, then we'd be better off 2A wise. Right now their votes and voices are meaningless, and it's unrealistic to believe that they're ever going to have enough voting power in those deep blue states to make a difference. The more pro gun states and representatives in Congress who will in turn appoint progun Federal judges the better.I hate to say this, especially as I'm not in the same residential conundrum some here are in.
But leaving a state for another further strengthens the stranglehold that those in power within that state have.
But it's hard to argue with the simple reality that people have to look out for themselves and their families as well.
6,006,429 people voted for the more progun candidates in the 2020 election in California, but that's only 34% of the total votes that counts for nothing. Realistically might as well not vote in Presidential or Senate races because it a waste of their time. AZ was lost by approx 10k votes. New Mexico by 100k. Nevada by approx 30k, so on and so forth... I respectfully disagree with your assessment. Leaving antigun states for states were your vote and voice counts will eventually strip the antigun states of Electoral votes and give representation in Congress. The the other side have no problem with leaving the states they had a hand in ruining for a better life in states with less taxes and better quality of living, so why can't gun owners in CA and NYC?
Last edited: