I am a paramedic and if I shot someone in my house, the agency responding is the agency I work for.
I would not be worried about bloodborne diseases and all that. However someone mentioned this earlier and I think it is a valid point:
If you shot the guy, and then rendered aid, and the guy died anyway; a case could be made that your "treatment" in some way contributed to his death. AKA: you finished him off.
That may seem farfetched to some, but I have worked in this field for many years and I have seen lawsuits, threats of lawsuits,................... from FAR more ridiculous things than this. Odds are that you would be involved in a civil suit anyway for shooting the guy. No reason to add fuel to the fire.
I would not be worried about bloodborne diseases and all that. However someone mentioned this earlier and I think it is a valid point:
If you shot the guy, and then rendered aid, and the guy died anyway; a case could be made that your "treatment" in some way contributed to his death. AKA: you finished him off.
That may seem farfetched to some, but I have worked in this field for many years and I have seen lawsuits, threats of lawsuits,................... from FAR more ridiculous things than this. Odds are that you would be involved in a civil suit anyway for shooting the guy. No reason to add fuel to the fire.