barnbwt
member
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2011
- Messages
- 7,340
Seeing as NYC dominates both Senate seats already, a split would instead yield new seats for upstate (along with more independent House seats).
Here's a fun graphic with a salient point, while we're talking about 3/5ths compromises;
Abbot down in Texas is this very moment suing to have districting apportioned by potential voters, rather than by bulk population (illegal immigrants, felons, deployed military, temporary residents). Given cities' propensity for a few of those groups, the shrill cry is of course, 'racism'
In truth, the prisons are probably a large lart of what binds upstate to NYC. Lotta money, jobs, and apparently, representation they would not have otherwise. The graphic obviously argues the city deserves even more absolute control over state affairs, if that's even possible. So why not make it its own entity (a District) and allow the other regions to resume governing themselves as intended by our republican system? It was never designed for remote political domination, as that is exactly what we broke from England for.
TCB
Here's a fun graphic with a salient point, while we're talking about 3/5ths compromises;
Abbot down in Texas is this very moment suing to have districting apportioned by potential voters, rather than by bulk population (illegal immigrants, felons, deployed military, temporary residents). Given cities' propensity for a few of those groups, the shrill cry is of course, 'racism'
In truth, the prisons are probably a large lart of what binds upstate to NYC. Lotta money, jobs, and apparently, representation they would not have otherwise. The graphic obviously argues the city deserves even more absolute control over state affairs, if that's even possible. So why not make it its own entity (a District) and allow the other regions to resume governing themselves as intended by our republican system? It was never designed for remote political domination, as that is exactly what we broke from England for.
TCB