Southern Rebel
Member
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2009
- Messages
- 154
I find it interesting that the PGO proponents are crying 'foul' when all I've seen from the conventionally-stocked shotgun proponents is a willingness to accept the limited virtues of the PGO shotgun IF the PGO proponents will accept that their tool is severely limited in scope and utility
RBERNIE, I think if you did a detailed reading of anti-PGO comments on this subject, you will indeed find expressions of "doorstop" and "useless" in several comments. Now I understand that people who are inclined to make such statements of ignorance probably aren't that knowledgeable about guns and are just repeating concepts they have read while their were playing the forums and pretending to be all-knowing Ninjas, maybe even of the Mall species.
Other than Forum Ninjas, most of the comments are not much different than we see when discussions are ongoing about the pistol caliber size and related stopping power. Few of us would dspute that a 44 magnum bullet is a more effective answer to a hard skull than a 32 auto, but we give a little space for the 32 user - without insulting him (usually). That space, I believe, is what is needed in this thread.
It is certainly more High Road to just say an individual has chosen a tougher path to his ultimate goal and may have to put in more practice and accept certain limitations, but he can arrive at his goal if he is willing to pay the extra price. (The same speech that I gave my son when he dropped out of college - "you can still be successful, but you have chosen a path that will probably be tougher and require more of you." He is now a successful individual, monetarily and socially.)
I chose a PGO for HD. Why?
1. Because I can
2. I like a challenge
3. I have dreams of teaching a pig to sing (Did I mention I like challenges?