Please Recommend A Spotting Scope

Status
Not open for further replies.
It depends on what you are spotting.
Shooting Highpower or similar on paper targets over an operators' pit, you will get a 3" (6" at Long Range) contrasting spotting disk that is not hard to see with about anything. The main use of a spotting scope is watching the mirage to estimate wind speed.
A decent spotting scope will show the "splash" on painted steel to a considerable distance. If the light is good, I had little trouble to 500 meters or 600 yards.
If you are hoping to pick bullet holes out of the black, I can't help. A friend and I spent one summer trying to find a combination of target colors that would show holes downrange with his 82mm Kowa.
 
I can see my bullet holes at 500 yards on brown shipping paper with several of my rifle scopes and my Kowa spotter...……...if the mirage isn't bad.

The other thing to consider is using shoot-n-see targets.

Forget about seeing holes on black targets at just about any distance. Just not enough contrast
 
I'm a little late to the thread, but I picked up my 60x spotting scope from harbor freight, can't recall the price but the image is as clear as my SWFA SS 10x42 (the best scope I own). It was pretty cheap, but feels solid, not that there is much to break on a spotting scope.
 
I'm a little late to the thread, but I picked up my 60x spotting scope from harbor freight, can't recall the price but the image is as clear as my SWFA SS 10x42 (the best scope I own). It was pretty cheap, but feels solid, not that there is much to break on a spotting scope.

Its listed for 49.99. At harbour freight.
 
This is my primary competition spotting scope. It is about $1000 with eyepiece, this eyepiece is a 20-60X zoom. I recommend the angled eyepiece, you are less likely to topple the scope over with the angled eyepiece.

7WoPl6a.jpg

yJxwOdR.jpg

This is my back up. If I am going to drive hours or days to matches, I will have a back up. It is a really good scope, but 65 mm. Lots of National Champion ships were won with 65 mm spotting scopes, but for competition, the wider the front lens, the better. Seeing the mirage, and seeing it as far left and right as possible, is an advantage. But this will fit into a medium sized tool box, and so it is my backup.

ON1xlvd.jpg

Notice, each of these scopes has a rotating center ring, I do not recommend buying a scope without a rotating center ring.

As good optically as this Celestron is, it does not have a rotating center ring and I had to rely on a universal joint (was available from Champion Shooters) to make it work.

Eie6G2l.jpg

TLw8oOE.jpg

When it was attached to my Freeland stand.

Fq25Mkq.jpg

Celestron also cheaps out on lens covers, what is in the picture came from a salad dressing bottle.

Optically this is a great scope, but totally ungainly. No center rotating ring, and the attachment point is way off from center. The manufacturer included a kludge extension bar, to balance the scope, and it never worked. Too many joints and attachment screws which came loose. I have used this scope at the Nationals and Regionals with this Ray Vin head. The scope is clear and it has a zoom eyepiece. But it is out of production due no doubt, to the poor balance. And cheap lens covers.

7vMtjrL.jpg

YvC1NKo.jpg




When I was shooting Across the Course this was my scope,

fMK4Wcq.jpg

Xx41H0U.jpg

3ScvarV.jpg

RzCA22A.jpg

A 25X long eye relief scope was just fine for Highpower. I could roll over in the rapids, as I was changing magazines, and look through the scope and often I would see the bullet holes at 200 yards, less often at 300 yards. It all depended on the mirage. The Freeland stand has too many joints and screws and they come loose at the wrong time. But decades ago, it was about the only thing around. A Freeland stand can be dissembled and put into a two foot long bag or container.

No scope can see through mirage. One year at Camp Perry a guy brought out a Russian Naval scope. This thing was huge, I think the forward lens was two or three feet in diameter, you looked through it through two eyepieces and it was on some sort of a ring turret mount which mounted to the deck. I got to look at the Viale targets about 1300 yards away. The image was clear from edge to edge, but, the mirage washed out any details on the target. It was like looking at something at the bottom of the pool.

I did have a cheap $100 Bariska 20-60X scope and I took that to a 500 yard match. The image was green, and the coating did not go all the way out to the edge, which make the image blurry. I could tell the difference in color between the black pasters and the bullseye. With my Pentax I could see white on the edges of the pasters. Obviously the $100 scope was not as optically good, I doubt a "birder" would use the thing as the colors were not true, but still, for $100 bucks, you could see things.

Also, at some lens quality level, teenagers will see things through your scope that you won't.
 
Last edited:
My Celestron and home made stand. Very stable. The spotter is nice and was between 4 & 5 hundred back years ago. It's good, not great. .30 cal bullets holes in the black at 300 yards are iffy, conditions need to be good. It has the rotating center ring. I imagine I would need to spend a good bit more than $500 to equal it these days. I'm not sure though, rifle scopes sure offer more for the money these days.
Spotting Scope Mounted to Stand Pic 1 @ 80%.JPG Spotting Scope Mounted to Stand Pic 2.JPG
 
This is one of the things i need to add to my kit, so thanks OP for asking the question and to all those who have replied. :thumbup:
 
While not what the OP asked for, just a few thoughts pertaining to buying quality. Although its designed more for hunting, this telescopic Swarovski does double duty at the range. Glass quality can't be overstated, often seen bullet holes at 200-to-300 yards when its so dark all the other shooters packed up and went home. Light gathering abilities become more apparent in those low light scenarios. I understand budget constraints limit the choices, often used higher end spotting scopes show up for about half price or less.

Spotting scope 4.jpg

Spotting scope 1.jpg
 
In budget optics, I've had good luck with Vortex. I mean, their cheap stuff is just that, cheap; but their mid range stuff and up is very nice AND the truly stand by their products.
 
Ok, so please tell me if I have wasted my money and time purchasing this Bushnell.
 

Attachments

  • 20190712_114135.jpg
    20190712_114135.jpg
    53.3 KB · Views: 12
I've got a Swarovski and a Kowa, both work great on standard bullet holes in paper out to 300...stretch it further and conditions would have to be ideal. Increased magnification just makes the mirage worse.

I'll second or 3rd the angled eyepiece and not going cheap on the tripod(s). I've got a Bogden Tripod that works well sitting/standing, a Sinclair bench mount that's rock solid, and a Ray-Vin prone stand. None were exactly cheap, but all are solid. Spend time spotting in the wind and you'll appreciate a solid stand.

No Kowa, but I do have a Swarovski. I also have Bogen tripods.

Buy once, cry once...good glass is not cheap...

upload_2020-4-19_12-7-6.jpeg
 
Ok, so please tell me if I have wasted my money and time purchasing this Bushnell.

You likely will be Satisfied, but likely not impressed by the Trophy Xtreme from Bushnell. Be realistic of your expectations - it’s a $250 spotting scope, which has a ~1.1mm exit pupil at the highest magnification. It’s going to appear dark. Anything below a 2-2.5mm exit pupil will tend to look dark for most folks, so a 1.1mm will assuredly be quite dark.

I have a few Trophy Xtreme scopes and I bought a pair of the Binos for my son to bang around in the woods. None of them are bad, and I suppose rather good image quality for the price point. The only downside I would mention, you paid about twice as much as you could have for it, since most folks qualify for the Bushnell program or know someone who does.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top