MissouriCrowinMass
Member
Hi,
I'm writing this to see if anyone else shares my opinion? I think that if any effective ideas about reducing mass-shootings are born - they will come from the firearms community. I'm 66. I belong to two Rod & Gun Clubs and I shoot a lot of trap and pin competitions. I've re-loaded both metallic and shot shells for years. I've always liked to shoot. I conceal carry - especially walking my dog at night. I'm not an AR guy, I like old MilSurp bolt action rifles. And, of course shotguns.
The people in my Clubs are some of the finest people that you'd ever meet. They would help you out in an emergency - some would give you the shirt off their backs. Most would really disagree with what I'm going to say.
I'm questioning Gun Control after the last school shooting. I've been thinking about it for years. What's the best thing to do to protect school kids? These mass shootings rip your heart out.
1. I support teachers "volunteering" to conceal carry after receiving Practical Shooting Training. I think this would be a deterrent to mass murders.
2. I support armed guards in schools.
3. I don't think banning bump-stocks will do squat.
Here's where I differ from the shooting community. I'm thinking that semi-auto weapons are just too effective in killing people to be legal and to be so available. I'm talking everything between an AR and an M-9. If a law that banned the manufacture of new semi-auto weapons and provided a buy-back of existing guns over a 30-year period were passed - anyone could keep their current semi's for their lifetime. I think such a law would need to additionally guarantee & reinforce the Right of Americans to own revolvers, bolt action rifles, low capacity auto-shotguns for hunting, pump shotguns and bolt action rifles forever. I'm not for dis-arming America. I am for reducing the number of semi-automatic human-killing machines available to any Tom, Dick or Harry.
I can think of the counter arguments. A nut could take a S&W Model 28 with 20 speed loaders and effect mass carnage. However, it would be harder than using an AR or AK with a 30 round mag. Semi-auto's with high-cap box magazines are just too effective in killing people fast. I think they should be military and police weapons only. Kel-Tec has a new 15-round high-cap shot gun. My question is - does a civilian need a weapon like that for self-protection? Imagine the carnage a 15-round shotgun could effect. I mentioned that I concealed carry. I carry a Sig P-238 but I'd feel just as safe with a K-frame revolver.
Is there anyone out there that feels the same way? This might be stupid as hell but what is the best way to do something? I think unless WE come up with an idea that the anti's will scapegoat us all for the mass shootings. I do not want to lose my Right to self-protect myself.
Thanks -I'd appreciate any ideas
I'm writing this to see if anyone else shares my opinion? I think that if any effective ideas about reducing mass-shootings are born - they will come from the firearms community. I'm 66. I belong to two Rod & Gun Clubs and I shoot a lot of trap and pin competitions. I've re-loaded both metallic and shot shells for years. I've always liked to shoot. I conceal carry - especially walking my dog at night. I'm not an AR guy, I like old MilSurp bolt action rifles. And, of course shotguns.
The people in my Clubs are some of the finest people that you'd ever meet. They would help you out in an emergency - some would give you the shirt off their backs. Most would really disagree with what I'm going to say.
I'm questioning Gun Control after the last school shooting. I've been thinking about it for years. What's the best thing to do to protect school kids? These mass shootings rip your heart out.
1. I support teachers "volunteering" to conceal carry after receiving Practical Shooting Training. I think this would be a deterrent to mass murders.
2. I support armed guards in schools.
3. I don't think banning bump-stocks will do squat.
Here's where I differ from the shooting community. I'm thinking that semi-auto weapons are just too effective in killing people to be legal and to be so available. I'm talking everything between an AR and an M-9. If a law that banned the manufacture of new semi-auto weapons and provided a buy-back of existing guns over a 30-year period were passed - anyone could keep their current semi's for their lifetime. I think such a law would need to additionally guarantee & reinforce the Right of Americans to own revolvers, bolt action rifles, low capacity auto-shotguns for hunting, pump shotguns and bolt action rifles forever. I'm not for dis-arming America. I am for reducing the number of semi-automatic human-killing machines available to any Tom, Dick or Harry.
I can think of the counter arguments. A nut could take a S&W Model 28 with 20 speed loaders and effect mass carnage. However, it would be harder than using an AR or AK with a 30 round mag. Semi-auto's with high-cap box magazines are just too effective in killing people fast. I think they should be military and police weapons only. Kel-Tec has a new 15-round high-cap shot gun. My question is - does a civilian need a weapon like that for self-protection? Imagine the carnage a 15-round shotgun could effect. I mentioned that I concealed carry. I carry a Sig P-238 but I'd feel just as safe with a K-frame revolver.
Is there anyone out there that feels the same way? This might be stupid as hell but what is the best way to do something? I think unless WE come up with an idea that the anti's will scapegoat us all for the mass shootings. I do not want to lose my Right to self-protect myself.
Thanks -I'd appreciate any ideas