Jorg Nysgerrig
Member
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2006
- Messages
- 7,822
Civil disobedience works.
Civil disobedience doesn't really apply to the enforcement of private contracts.
Civil disobedience works.
If he was really a big supporter of the 2A, he would put pressure on this mysterious entity known as "corporate" to change their asinine policy.
But glad you got it resolved.
And what exactly makes you think so, especially in this context?Crunker1337 said:Civil disobedience works.
Nope, that's not what the Supreme Court said. The Supreme Court said (in effect and grossly simplified) that the federal government can't prevent you from keeping a firearm (subject, perhaps to some limitations to be named later). The Supreme Court did not say, and can not say, that under the Constitution a private party can not by contract prevent you from keeping a firearm. These are very different things.wep45 said:"Corporate" says you can't keep a firearm; the Supreme Court says tht you can....
And exactly what is that stupid statement supposed to mean?wep45 said:Fiddle your diddle and take a pill...
And as a lawyer with more than 30 years experience, it's my professional opinion that such a clause is in fact enforceable, unless a state statute expressly prohibits such a clause. It appears that only a few states have such a statute, and Maryland isn't such a state.glockman19 said:As an apartment owner and landlord I believe that the caluse is unenforceable. It is a violation of teh tenants rights on both a State and National level.