Single six rosewood on a wrangler?

Status
Not open for further replies.
I have a Single Six with the wood laminate grips. They look decent, but the fit is horrible, easily the worst of any gun I have owned. I need to find something to replace them with.
 
Anything but the stock ones. I own two Heritage Rough Riders that I got before the Wrangler came out. Even if the Ruger had already been available, those HRR woodies probably still would have been the deciding factor. I just can't get past plastics on a SA revolver.

(Oh, and I do also own a RSS, so this is not an invitation to a HRR vs R-anything discussion.)
 
Not to rain on your parade, but those grips are laminated birch, stained to simulate Indian rosewood. True rosewood from Brazil is near chocolate color. And tuns nearly black with age.

Bob Wright
I know Bob, it is "Rosewood" color. Real rosewood would be really cool....
 
I know Bob, it is "Rosewood" color. Real rosewood would be really cool....

As a matter of information, Brazilian rosewood is no longer imported due to a ban. The trees are in an area protected by law for the preservation of the rain forest there. Bolivian rosewood is a close second, with African and Indian being somewhat farther behind.

As for me, I still rate good walnut my favorite, with rosewood a close second. Macassar ebony is highly prized, though not among my favorite



Bob Wright
 
I hated the Wranglers cheesy plastic grips, too. I grabbed a couple sets of laminated wood grips with the fleur de lis pattern when Altamont grips has a $20 sale (Black Friday 2019). One set of Walnut grips went on the Wrangler, one set of rosewood went on the Single Six.

1E3DCA4B-63B5-4CE7-BDBC-A26E06CF0132.jpeg

And you are correct, the OEM Single Six grips (or Single Six OEM-sized aftermarkets) do fit the hand better, too. :thumbup:

Stay safe.
 
I seem to recall that 1873 Colts came with cheesy hard rubber grips, or bakelite, which was the plastic of the day.

Of course I prefer wood grips as well. I suppose one of the reasons the Wrangler can be had under $200 is the cheesy plastic grips.
 
bannockburn writes:

I know what you mean. It's like seeing Pachmayr grips on a Ruger Blackhawk. They may feel great but somehow it just doesn't look right to me.

Yep. The first gun I was issued on the job in 1987 was a Model 67 (stainless .38 S&W.) I immediately put a set of Pachmayrs on it, which made a world of difference in handling and shooting, something that was certainly necessary on the job.

A couple of years ago, I sourced a replacement 67 for nostalgia reasons. Since I don't need it to do what I needed that first one to do, it's not getting those put back on. The wood stays (unless someone wants to gift me some genuine stags!) ;)
 
Would ya'll show pics of the bottom of Wangler frames with grips pictured? Most replacement grips put on a Wrangler are short about 1/16" from reaching the bottom of the frame. If ya'll's fit there I will buy a pair.
 
Would ya'll show pics of the bottom of Wangler frames with grips pictured? Most replacement grips put on a Wrangler are short about 1/16" from reaching the bottom of the frame. If ya'll's fit there I will buy a pair.
Mine fit perfectly. The plastic ones werent flush and rubbed my pinkie finger when I put it under the frame. That is all a non issue with the wood grips.
 
Anyone know of wood wrangler grips in stock? Placed an order from the Ruger website and they took the money but then emailed that they're out of stock. Does Altamont still have long lead times?
 
Found some in stock on rugers site.

Some may say I'm an idiot for sending 50 for grips on a 200 dollar gun.

Ah well.
 
I seem to recall that 1873 Colts came with cheesy hard rubber grips, or bakelite, which was the plastic of the day.

Of course I prefer wood grips as well. I suppose one of the reasons the Wrangler can be had under $200 is the cheesy plastic grips.

Not Bakelite but gutta percha. Bakelite didn't come out until around 1910 or so.

Bob Wright
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top