Small framed revolvers

chaim

Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2002
Messages
3,846
Location
Columbia, MD
This almost feels strange for me to say, I am a fan of snub nosed, small frame revolvers. Small framed snubs are harder to shoot accurately, less comfortable to shoot, and generally less forgiving than most other handgun types. Capacity for size and weight is low compared to autos. Like many people, when I first started shooting them, I didn't like them. I got rid of my 1st (a Taurus 605) less than a year after I bought it. My 2nd, a used Taurus 85CH I bought 15 or so years ago, I still have it, but until recently I never loved it (I have always liked the trigger). I always hated my 442, and for years I planned to sell it. I replaced it 3 years ago with a Taurus 856UL, just over an ounce heavier (and so just a little more comfortable to shoot), 6 rounds instead of 5, but I never sold the 442. Around the same time I bought the 856, I also bought a Colt King Cobra (new model). In between the 856 and King Cobra and earlier 85 and 442 were two Rossi 461s (a 2" and 3"), but I've never trusted them due to some reliability issues with the 2" (binding when shooting magnums). I will be putting them on consignment at a local store as soon as I can get there (maybe later this week). I had planned to also sell the 442, but I'll be keeping it (more on that later)

I like the 856. Something about a revolver that pocket carries better than a small auto IMO (the rounded shapes don't broadcast "gun" in a pocket the way the sharp edges of an auto do), and whether IWB or in a pocket, the rounded edges of a revolver are more comfortable for me than most autos. I love my Colt. Despite having the Colt, having very good CCW autos, and the 6 round 856, I do at times find myself carrying my old 85CH IWB quite a bit now that I can carry regularly in my home state.

Recently I even started carrying the 442 again (I haven't carried it in years). When I want a pocket gun I usually carry the 856UL. I recently had my first squib load, which in this case stuck partly in the cylinder and partly in the barrel of my 856. I left it for the range's gunsmith, and while I was without the 856, I broke the 442 out for pocket carry a few times (I usually pocket carry my 856 when I IWB carry another revolver due to the lower capacity).

I haven't shot it in several years, and I'm sure the 442 will be just as unpleasant as ever at the range, but it does carry very well (I have replaced the Secret Service Boot Grips with some Pachmayr grips that should make it a little better at the range, and do make it a little harder to conceal, but won't impact either all that much). However, it is a hair lighter and thinner than my 856 (1.3" wide vs. 1.41", 14.7oz vs. 16oz), and a little shorter in length. Supposedly the height is also shorter, though grip selection probably will more than make up that difference. While I'd prefer the extra round of the 856, and the differences are marginal, they do add up and it is a little better for pocket carry. Also, my ankle holster (almost never used, just for some niche backup uses) is for a J-frame and the 856 is just a little too big for it, the 85CH is a little heavy for all day ankle carry, so the 442 will be great in this backup role.

I am keeping the 442 and have ordered a new pocket holster for it.

These may not be ideal guns for almost any use. There are lighter guns with greater capacity for carry. There are more pleasant guns to shoot at the range. However, once you've put in the time to shoot them well (I have) they are incredibly rewarding guns to shoot, they are fun to shoot (well, the steel framed ones are), the lightweight versions may pocket carry better than any other gun (and certainly better than any near their capability), and they are probably the most comfortable IWB guns there are.

Somehow over a 20 year period I've moved from hating them, to not really liking them but having a couple of them for their advantages for some niche uses, to now, I am a hardcore member of the small framed snub fan club.
 
Last edited:
You are right in saying the snub (In my mind a barrel of 2” or less) revolver is one that requires solid fundamentals to shoot consistently. Having a solid handgun-marksmanship foundation certainly makes the shooting of small revolvers much more satisfying , hopefully leading to more and better practice. I do see where my errors are magnified on target by the short sight radius and the limited sight options on most snubs, so concentrating on the steps for good shooting is one thing that helps me keep them going where they should. (I have a batch of 1 7/8” to 3” J and K frame, Dan Wesson and GP100 revolvers, the 2” length I stated above is just my own idea of a “snubby.”;))

With any firearm in a life or death gunfight, good skills combine with good tactics (and good luck) to help skew the odds in your favor. You are happy with your guns and what you can do with them, having confidence in your firearm and abilities are a very important part of any CCW strategy. :thumbup:

Stay safe.
 
Last edited:
In 1997 my wife bought me a S&W 442 for my birthday. As a kid I loved the old detective movies and cop shows on TV. I was the only kid in my neighborhood that carried a cap gun that looked like a Colt Detective. Everyone else had big cap guns.

After I got the 442 I went to the shooting range with a variety of .38 Spl ammo. After shooting a few cylinders I thought to myself “What in the heck was I thinking? I can’t hit a damn thing with this gun!”
But it was too cool to not shoot it so I practiced and practiced. I decided +P was not for me and concentrated on hits and double taps. All of a sudden I became proficient with it.
This gun was always with me in some fashion. If it wasn’t on me I had a leather padded gun rug that I kept it in. It was in my backpack, saddlebags, brief case, tool bag, etc.
It still looks nice after all this time. It stayed more in it’s gun rug than it was on me.
I have tried a number of cheap ankle holsters, but recently got a DeSantis Apache. Wow! I really like this holster. I also bought the boot extension for it for when I wear boots.
I plan to carry the 442 on my ankle and I am testing different holsters for a Glock 48. I also bought a snubbie holster to carry my model 36. It worked nicely until I went out for a day with it on. I learned that this holster from Wild Bills Holsters is great holster except for me it puts the muzzle of my 36 and my 442 firmly against my hip bone. Ouch! So, there’s another failed holster for the holster box…

I also have a S&W 327 Night Guard and a Colt Detective Special. The Colt will never be a carry gun. I got it because I have always wanted one.

Here are my Snub Nosed Revolvers
D5CAB4EA-8F3F-4327-9914-5D9667F15D1D.jpeg
 
Just placed an order for a new Charter Arms Off Duty, the newer concealed-hammer version. I've done a bit of research comparing it to the 642, and I believe I will be satisfied. I really don't know why I'm buying it, but it will be my fifth Charter Arms, and the only one newer than the one I bought the day I got my badge back in 1987 (the oldest is from 1966, my birth year, and once belonged to my dad.)

I also have an old Rossi 68 and a Taurus 85 stainless, with barrels of 2.5 and three inches, respectively. In addition, I have a Smith and Wesson M&P Bodyguard Crimson Trace, which I've never actually shot. Bought it from someone who herself never shot it; she had gotten it during the "pandemic-scare", and decided to leave the country instead. I'm gonna compare that with the new Off Duty and (possibly) choose to keep only one.

All that, and I usually don't carry a revolver as a primary, anyway. ;)
 
I guess I'm weird. I actually went from the Ruger LCR 357, Taurus M85, and the S&W 640 Pro and M60 snubbies to preferring medium and large frame snub-nosed revolvers over their smaller J-frame brethren. Now I feel like the J-frame sized revolvers feel like little fragile anorexic kids toys during the once in a blue moon occasion that I handle one now.
 
I like my 3" Taurus 85 and my newer 2" Taurus 856. I also have a 2" Taurus 942 in 22LR which makes a nice little wood gun and a good trainer for the other revolvers. While Taurus small frame revolvers are nothing fancy, they do work well.

And for some reason I still want a small frame in 327.
 
The snub 38 has it's place. For me it's Rossi 885 with snake shot in the first two chambers while walking the dog in the Arizona desert. That little all steel wheelie works perfectly and accurately with whatever I stuff in it.
Ya, bumping into these guys when a good distance from help can certainly make for a bad day.

I was not armed the March afternoon I was chalking lines for a parking area and nearly walked over this healthy 4’ diamondback at Lake Havasu.

675A19AF-431B-4EC7-8518-3E6F6F62B97E.jpeg

I was armed in October when we were searching for the body of a murder victim dumped out in the desert near Edwards AFB. One of the guys searching 25 feet to my right did a hop-step to avoid stepping on this Mojave Green about 45 minutes into the search.

6315EA5C-977B-4A68-A2F3-C89AAF231B02.jpeg

Luckily, both times it was cold enough to make the critters so sluggish they didn’t even react to my presence. A bit of prodding with a stick woke them up and sent both slowly back to their dens and away from causing harm.

Had I an inquisitive dog along nosing around on a nice warm day? Things probably wouldn’t have ended so pleasantly for the reptiles.

Stay safe.
 
My third Agent , wore two out since 1976 , this one does not get worn much , is in a pouch with ammo in two speed loaders. The speed loaders for K frame .38s work pretty good in Colt D frames . I have a horesehide pocket holster for this and and an old Berns-Martin upside down shoulder rig I had since 70s for these too.
colt-agent-38-spl-1977-2-jpg.jpg
berns-martin.jpg
 
Last edited:
Blue Jays
Handy tool to put in your jacket to walk the dog around the block or to take out your garbage before dawn.

Sounds a lot like I use to do with my S&W Model 38. Lived at the time in a neighborhood with some shady characters for neighbors. On night time walks I kept my right hand on the gun in my coat pocket while my left hand held the dog's leash. Never had any trouble but like to think I was fairly well equipped for any problem that might have arisen!
 
Chaim I agree with a lot of your points on snub nose revolvers. However I'm the opposite in the sense that I've always preferred snub nose revolvers for concealed carry.

I've always **** revolvers better than semi autos in general regardless of if it's a snub nose revolver or a 4 inch barreled model. The only semi auto I've **** as good or better than service sized revolver is the 1911. But yes Zi agree they definitely have a place still for defensive use. I also agree with you on why a snub nose revolver carries better and more comfortably IWB as well.

I've also included a picture of my EDC a new Colt king Cobra carry in 357 mangum. I also have a S&W M&P340CT that is in my carry rotation as well. IMG_20230114_155102593.jpg
 
Chaim I agree with a lot of your points on snub nose revolvers. However I'm the opposite in the sense that I've always preferred snub nose revolvers for concealed carry.

I've always **** revolvers better than semi autos in general regardless of if it's a snub nose revolver or a 4 inch barreled model. The only semi auto I've **** as good or better than service sized revolver is the 1911. But yes Zi agree they definitely have a place still for defensive use. I also agree with you on why a snub nose revolver carries better and more comfortably IWB as well.

I've also included a picture of my EDC a new Colt king Cobra carry in 357 mangum. I also have a S&W M&P340CT that is in my carry rotation as well. View attachment 1128014
Are those harret stocks?
 
I have 3, a Detective Special 1966, a DS '72, a Charter Arms Bulldog, and I suppose one of my Dan Wessons with a 2.5" barrel could pass for one. Like to find a pre-war Detective Special for that 1930s look. Colt always emphasized their 6th shot, in this day of wonder calibers and high capacity we need to remember that speed and power are fine but accuracy is final. And like a pocket knife, its compactness makes it comfortable to carry-and there when you need it.
 
Shoebox1.1 those stocks were made by a company called "Sile" or "Siles" back in the 1970's. I actually just got those this past week from another member over on the Colt forums.

The funny thing about it is that I had had that same set of grips about 15 years ago on a Colt Cobra. So I just put up a want to buy ad on the Colt forums looking for a set for sale. Incidentally I believe herretts did make a couple of stocks in that same skip checkered pattern.,I think they made them for revolvers and semi autos I know they made them for the 1911 because I had a set of those as well.

As a side note the 2017 Cobra and 2019 king Cobra guns use the same frame and grips made for the D frame Colts do fit these newer Colt revolvers. You just need a grip locator pin the hole is already in the grip frame on these newer Colts too. I spoke to badger grips last week and they even sell a grip locator pin for this purpose. I can't say with 100% certainty that EVERY grip made for the older D frame Colts with fit these newer "D" frame sized guns. But I can say Harretts the styles ones and the original Colt grips that came on the post 66 short square butt frame D frames, as well as pachmayr grips do fit these newer "D" frame guns. This is confirmed by several members on the Colt forum that have put older defend grips on these newer guns just in case you're wondering or know anyone who's looking for grips for the newer Colts. Just thought I'd pass it along as to maybe help someone else too.
 
I wouldn’t mind some vintage wood on my king cobra! Iirc the heretts with this pattern are “ shooting ace” panels? Maybe someone more knowledgeable than me can verify that. Looks great! I wish I had a newer cobra 2 inch with the vintage panels! I think colt made a small run a couple years ago
 
"…On night time walks I kept my right hand on the gun in my coat pocket while my left hand held the dog's leash…"
Exactly. A much more elegant and unobtrusive way to help maintain the local peace. It allows one to graciously approach known friends and unknown strangers alike with a pleasant demeanor yet nobody (except you) knows any different. Certainly a distinct advantage.
 
I like the S&W shrouded hammer models. I'll never get used to the double-action only -- just me. I want single action available to me -- my brain's wiring / have an accuracy bias.

A hammerless or shrouded hammer snub has its place in home defense, not just as a carry or backup. Why, because it is more difficult for an attacker to wrest it out of a defender's hand, plus the attacker is less likely to block the hammer when attempting to grab the revolver.

For my wife, I load a shrouded-hammer .38 Spl snub with full wadcutters. At the range, she shot these best / most accurately. She's not good with recoil. My home defense shotgun is a 20 ga -- she can shoot that best (a 20 ga loaded with buckshot has more energy than a .44 mag, so it's no puny thing). Me, I always have a chopped 9mm nearby (which I don't particularly like, but it fits my hand, and is accurate-enough).

If one has a small frame revolver chambered in .32 Long (.32 New Police), Buffalo Bore loads wadcutters for this in semi- and full wadcutter configs. I have some and they do a lot more damage to a 2"x4" plank than regular .32 Long ammunition, round nose or full wadcutter. The B.Bore ammo splinters the dickens out the back of a 2x4. B.Bore has more recoil, but not prohibitive. In .32, I prefer a 3" barrel and like the 4" barrel for plinking at the range. I have some old S&W Hand Ejectors. I'm a nostalgia nut. Things simply got the job done, "back in the day".

A snub can shoot accurately enough for self defense. Just practice practice practice.
.
 
Back
Top